Been pouring over some Sig patents for the their LMG, and thought I'd highlight some minor design changes from the production MX250 compared to the first prototype I saw in 2019. These are external changes of course, not much has been publicly disclosed about the internals so far
The production model (left) now has a continuous length M-LOK interface on the underside, and the profile of the upper portion has been tweaked. The prodution XM250 has lost its side folding stock capability, due to the necessesity of a battery pack for the powered rail.
Aside to some minor profile tweaks here and there, it doesn't appear to have changed all that much. Of course there is the 'rail on a rail' to properly accomodate the XM157, without interferring with the feed cover. Kinda validates the FN Evolys' design in that department.
The SIG-LMG is understood to use a combined short-recoil and gas piston system of operation. With a bolt group housed inside the barrel extention, itself forming part of the barrel group that also moves during the firing cycle.
Here is @xmszeon great animation based on the patent information, to see how it works in motion.
The recently published @RUSI_org co-published by @Jack_Watling & Nick Reynolds is very much worth a read. I wanted to highlight some passages of the first chapter, focussing on the battle of Kiev, as these snippets do provide some worthwhile insights 1/x
Especially in the context of the Ukrainian experience of the battle, viewed through Twitter, something we don't to get a lot of. So first, caveats: Twitter is an echo chamber, like all social media. A lot of commentators are pro-Ukrainian, and a lot of the media coming out 2/x
of this conflict have put emphasis on Ukrainian successes, something which the Russians have difficulty in countering, from an 'information warfare' point of view. To me at least, a prevailing percpetion of how the battle was going went a little something like this: 3/x