Just a reminder: because of non-proportional representation and demographics: in order to break the filibuster and overcome the R+6-7 bias in the Senate, Democrats would need to win 3 straight elections by 19 points to make abortion legal nationally. 1/n
They need to win the national vote several times in a row by 5+ points to have a shot at breaking even.

Most forecasters look at the 2024 landscape, and don't think there's much of a chance for Democrats to hold the Senate past the 2024 election. 2/n
Mitch McConnell has promised that if Republicans regain control of the Senate in 2022, that he will not let Biden put any more Supreme Court justices on the bench. He would keep seats open for up to 6 years if he had to. 3/n
Starting in January 2023, there is probably no meaningful hope of changing the composition of the court.

It is estimated that the US's already sky high maternal mortality rate will rise by 21% as a result of Dobbs v. Jackson. 4/n
Most states are so gerrymandered that changing the composition of the state legislature is effectively impossible. The GOP has been able to maintain super majorities in the WI legislature despite losing elections by up to 10 points. 5/n
Because SCOTUS has approved political gerrymanders vis GIll, in most states that ban abortion there is no realistic hope of reversing these bans by voting out the incumbents who put the bans in place.

Only 8% of US House seats are competitive due to gerrymandering. 6/n
A few states allow voter initiated ballot initiatives or state constitutional amendments. However, SCOTUS has allowed state legislatures to effectively overturn them. Example: Floridians voted to restore the voting rights of felons overwhelmingly. 7/n
The (gerrymandered) state legislature turned around and passed a law requiring felons to prove they have paid all court fees before rights can be restored. Problem is, records in Florida are so sloppy that it is effectively impossible to do so. 8/n
This requirements was as fair as a 1950's literacy test to vote, and thus the ballot initiative was thwarted by politicians who cannot be voted out of office, aided and abetted by a SCOTUS put in place by Presidents who lost the popular vote. 9/n
There are VERY few good options for bringing back abortion rights after Dobbs v. Jackson. The US political and legal system is so broken that it is completely immune to the will of the people. A lot of legal minded folks can see the writing on the wall. 10/n
The loss of an implied right to privacy under the 4th amendment, and institutionalizing the Glucksberg Test is likely the end of guaranteed access to birth control, same sex marriage, and the return of sodomy laws throughout the US South (at least 12 states). 11/n
AT the same time, LGBT people are being labeled pedophiles and groomers, our trans children are being taken away by the state, and our existences obscenity. It's not hard to see a future where Texas is has banned SSM again and is yanking kids from loving LGBT homes. 12/n
We can already see that the GOP wants to ban abortion throughout the US in 2025 by ending the filibuster and passing a national law. GOP legislators are talking about women being prevented from leaving states to get abortions elsewhere. 13/n
Other states are passing fetal personhood amendments that would potentially allow states like Texas to reach into blue states where abortion remains legal (e.g. New Mexico) to prosecute doctors in NM who provide abortions to Texans (possibly under the felony murder rule) 14/n
This sets the US up for the nightmare scenario of red states demanding extradition of women, doctors, and LGBT people who have fled to other states to escape the tyranny of religiously conservative red states that are no longer functioning democracies. 15/n
Yes, this is basically lining up the court for a Dred Scott II decision.

It also sets up the scenario where persecuted people don't stop at a blue state: the end of the line is Canada.

So what happens when the Trumpist US gives Canada the ultimatum: extradite them or else? 16/n
Anyone who studies this is well aware that the US has basically stopped being a functioning Democracy, and that it's only going to get worse from here. The right wing populist GOP is clearly telegraphing where it wants to go: permanent minoritarian Christian nationalist rule 17/n
People who don't study this within this analytical framework, but understand broadly that losing Roe v. Wade is bad and it FEELS like we're heading towards the Republic of Gilead, are rightly alarmed: they may not be conscious of all these things, but they sense the trend. 18/n
And they grasp in a general sense where this goes (though not the specifics)

We're heading towards either a corrupt, authoritarian dystopian nightmare for women, LGBT people, and non-Christians, or a fracturing of the US that ends the American experiment permanently 19/n
Unless these more than one HUGE black swan events, those are basically the options on the table. Pick one.

But somehow, institutionalists want to deny the facts of the situation as I detailed them. 20/n
They demand everyone behave as if voting and protests in designated zones is their best chance to change things, when anyone with a lick of analytic sense can clearly see that the GOP and SCOTUS DGAF about what the majority of the population want. 21/n
They're oblivious to the fact that these systems have failed, and that the public can no longer show their displeasure by voting incumbents out of office, put in different judges, pass ballot initiatives.

The GOP, and SCOTUS, know protests have no effect. 22/n
Which brings me to my point: I look at the hand wringing over the supposed optics of peaceful protesting outside of Kavanaugh's home, and want to put my head through my desk.

This is a mild escalation of things. 23/n
If they're so worried about the decorum, they should be be focused on the reasons WHY people have felt that protesting in front of the court is effectless. It's like complaining that about the fire department using axes in your house when it's burning to the ground. 24/n
Yeah, it's destructive, but way worse than what's happening in the bigger picture.

And the big picture for the US is ****ing terrifying. 25/n

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Brynn Tannehill

Brynn Tannehill Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BrynnTannehill

May 15
I read the shooter's manifesto. He's not mentally ill. He's quite meticulous and analytic for an 18 year-old. He's basically exactly the racist, anti-Semitic stochastic terrorist you'd expect of someone regularly fed a diet of Tucker Carlson, 4Chan, and far-right propaganda. 1/n
Almost all of his racist, anti-Semitic talking points come directly from somewhere (there's not a lot of novelty here): and a large percentage of them are things you'll hear on any given night on Tucker Carlson, particularly the racist stuff. 2/n
This includes:

* Great replacement theory
* Superiority of "western" culture
* Crime
* Makers vs. Takers via a racial lens
* Worship of guns

Nothing I am saying here is new, though. This was a horrific crime directed against Black people.

However, there's more. 3/n
Read 13 tweets
May 12
I haven't done a thread on Ukraine in a while, for the most part because it was difficult to suss out where things are going. That's changed a bit in the past week, as several thing have happened at once that (quietly) have much bigger implications. 1/n
The May Day parade did not feature Putin making any pronouncements about declaring war, mass mobilization, threats of using WMD on NATO, annexation of Donbas & Kerson Oblast, etc. This may reflect (a little) de-escalation from within the Kremlin. It has manpower implications 2/n
Without mass mobilization, the RU army has what is has. When it started the war, it had ~130 BTGs over the entire front. Now, it's "consolidated" down 99 BTGs in Kharkiv, Donbas, and Southern front after abandoning attempts at Kyiv. 3/n
Read 25 tweets
May 4
A number of people have pointed out that Alito's opinion basically says, "Sure, you COULD apply this opinion to other cases, but you shouldn't," with regards to Lawrence, Griswold, and Obergefell.

This is like the evil the evil version of this scene: 1/n
Alito's ref to these cases is basically him saying

I'd like to help you but I can't

I'd like to tell you to bring me an impact litigation case but I can't

I'd like to tell you to argue stare decisis doesn't apply to egregiously decided cases like Obergefell but I can't 2/n
I'd like to tell you to argue that there's no historical basis for gay rights in National history and thus no legal basis for them, but I can't.

I'd like to tell you to argue that the people and elected officials should make the decision about gay marriage, but I can't. 3/n
Read 6 tweets
May 3
I'm telling you now how this is going to go down:

About a week after the decision to overturn Roe is released, AG Paxton in TX will release an opinion that TX is not bound by Obergefell. 1/n
Within days, Abbott will issue an executive order instructing clerks not to issue new marriage licenses to same sex couples.

He may or may not instruct state officials to cease honoring existing licenses for same sex couples. 2/n
There's likely to be some language about determining legality of marriages based on sex listed on original, un-amended birth certificates.

State courts will affirm legality of Abbott's actions in light of Jackson's Women's Health decision. 3/n
Read 6 tweets
May 3
Reading through the leaked decision. Alito makes it clear that Obergefell and Lawrence will be overturned. This means same sex marriage will be illegal again in 30+ states, and homosexuality illegal in 12. It's not if, but when. This is a stage 5 cancer diagnosis for LGBT rights.
Most states are gerrymandered to the point where changing the state legislature is impossible. Those same states generally prohibit voter initiated ballot initiatives. The notion that they can be brought back at the state level is a fantasy that only SCOTUS believes.
It's also worth mentioning that Alito's arguments clearly open the doors to the return of sumptuary and cross dressing laws. Given the death of privacy rights, and Lawrence, the end state is that it will become illegal to be trans in your own home.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 27
Because my parents told me they'd rather have a dead kid than a gay one when I was 13.

THAT'S why these features exist. Image
Just as an update: I came out at 37. My Mom had come around on gays after working in the event industry in the 90s. My Dad and I have an uneasy truce, mostly because he wants to see the grandkids.

They both vote Trump, and have no idea why this is bad.
When our eldest came out thinking he might be bi, the conversation went along these lines:

Me: Ok. Yeah, this is when people usually start figuring... GD it, the cat barfed on our comforter again

Kid: It says something that you're more upset about the vomit than me coming out.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!