Russia called up at least 100,000 reservists during the first phase of its war in Ukraine, but experts assess there are not many still waiting to fight.
The Russian military announced a spring recruitment effort last month that will last into June.
Even if Russia succeeds in recruiting 130,000 more soldiers as it said it would, it won’t be able to increase its ability to fight on the ground in Ukraine anytime soon.
It would take months to train new recruits and integrate them into existing units.
Training will also likely be a problem. Russia’s military is a hybrid entity that consists partly of professional volunteer soldiers, known as contract soldiers, and partly of conscripts.
The conscripts serve one-year terms that aren’t long enough to receive adequate training.
They also don’t receive additional training after returning home. That means many are not much more skilled than regular civilians.
These conscripts make up around one-third of the Russian military.
Many of the individuals responsible for training new soldiers have already been sent to the front line, raising questions about who would be available to train recruits.
Ukrainian sources tell me that in intercepted phone calls, Russians say they have signed contracts to fight for only 90 days.
Many Russians will expect to be sent home from the front line sometime in May. That could raise significant problems for Russia’s war effort.
Those contract fighters will probably be obliged to stay past their 90-day contracts. But that will dampen morale.
Putin has not formally declared war on Ukraine. Unless he does, it will be difficult to justify a further mass mobilization.
Conscripts cannot be legally sent to fight in combat, although many were forced to sign contracts so the military could lawfully send them into Ukraine.
All in all, as one Russian military expert told me, “there is no large body of Russian manpower coming....There’s no large Russian reserve available."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In the days leading up to the invasion of Ukraine, Putin met personally with leaders from Argentina and Brazil.
But even in countries with some vocal support for Russia among the political classes, major internal divisions have become evident in recent weeks.
In Brazil: far-right President Jair Bolsonaro refused to condemn Putin over the war.
But Vice President Hamilton Mourão publicly split with Bolsonaro, applauding the Western support for Ukraine and declaring that Brazil supports Ukraine’s sovereignty.
I had quite an interesting interview w/@radeksikorski on one of his recent visits to Washington. The interview is locked, so here's a 🧵with the main points.
First, he said Putin lost the war to take all of Ukraine. Now the aim is to grab territory.
.@radeksikorski noted that the U.S. Congress is "captured by special interests, including the tech companies."
"The European Union is the last hope of humanity to regulate tech issues in a sensible way that allows tech companies to make money but protects privacy..'"
He didn't rule out that Vladimir Putin would attack a NATO country.
"You can't exclude rash action if Putin feels his own power is at stake," he said.
In an apparent effort to combat Chinese influence in the Indo-Pacific, the U.S. has prioritized its relationship with Australia and left key European allies fuming. My latest @nationaljournalnationaljournal.com/s/714998/biden…
Main takeaways from the piece:
• Australia is now central to the Biden admin’s foreign policy goals
• Europe is no longer Washington's most important ally
• Washington thinks it was Australia's job to communicate with the French.
• Lawmakers from both parties support AUKUS
“In the face of increasing aggression by China, especially the heightened threat of President Xi [Jinping] unilaterally using military force to achieve political objectives, strengthening our defense ties with the U.K. and Australia is the right move,” @JimInhofe said.
“The Trump Administration’s interactions with Saudi Arabia have been shrouded in secrecy, raising significant questions about the nature of the relationship,” according to a memo by the House Oversight Committee released today newsweek.com/jared-kushner-…
The so-called “the Middle East Marshall Plan” being floated by the Trump administration involved Michael Flynn and Thomas Barrack, the Trump inauguration chairman who recently defended Saudi Arabia's murder of Jamal Khashoggi newsweek.com/jared-kushner-…
“It just goes to show that Barrack, despite his last role being the Trump inauguration campaign chair, is still intimately involved with Trump and his administration," @KatiePhang told me newsweek.com/jared-kushner-…