in general I don't respond to trolls.
but the idea that "well of course the court won't overturn griswold (the right to contraception) because some justices said it was settled in their confirmation hearings" is absurd on its face.
but the idea that "well of course the court won't overturn griswold (the right to contraception) because some justices said it was settled in their confirmation hearings" is absurd on its face.
(i won't link to it bc i don't do free p.r.)
and the idea that NOBODY will ask the court to overturn griswold is belied by (1) the LA bill that would criminalize some forms of contraception; (2) this OK bill that would do the same; ...
tulsaworld.com/news/local/okl…
tulsaworld.com/news/local/okl…
(3) the fact that conservatives elide the difference between abortion and contraception by insisting that some common methods of contraception (IUDs & emergency contraception) are abortifacients;
(4) this MO bill (which criminalizes some contraception on that very ground) missouriindependent.com/2021/06/23/con…
(5) a statement by the MS governor saying he won't rule out criminalizing contraception and overruling Griswold.
people.com/health/mississ…
people.com/health/mississ…
I could go on, but there's a limit to the amount of time I'm willing to spend refuting non-arguments by trolls. So /end.
jk; one last thing. if you're wondering whose SCOTUS predictions you should take more seriously, may i recommend a compare/contrast: 
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
