Ladies and gentlemen, if you look under the hood this was NOT a friendly inflationary report for the Fed and markets.
I'd argue it actually increases the probability the Fed will have to go with a non-linear, more aggressive hawkish rhetoric to slow down inflation.
1/7
Sure, inflation ''slowed down'' to 8.3% YoY but base effects are huge and Powell himself told us they are focusing on MoM changes and looking at the composition of inflationary pressures.
So, we should look at those too...
2/7
Core inflation printed 0.6% MoM and beat ALL the 67 estimates in the Bloomberg economists' survey.
What's more important is that the contributions to the CPI baskets are changing: less inflation from used cars (volatile, red), much more from shelter (sticky, white).
3/7
Goods inflation is receding and broad-based services inflation is picking up. The Fed delay's in withdrawing accommodative policies has allowed inflation to feed into the stickier items of the CPI basket.
Have a look at the shelter contribution to CPI in more details.
4/7
The pace of change in the inflation drop matters too.
The Fed told us by the end of 2022 they will hike to around 2% and this will slow inflation down to 4%.
It's not enough for CPI to slow
The question is whether it's slowing enough, and which components are responsible?
5/7
This report pushes the Fed one step closer to ''we REALLY have to show we got a grip on inflation'' - basically put themselves convincingly ahead of the curve so to lower inflation expectations and avoid the risk of sticky inflation becoming stickier.
6/7
In tomorrow's piece on TheMacroCompass.substack.com we are going to talk about market pricing in inflation and bonds, why an even more hawkish Fed stance might be one step closer and what that would mean for your portfolio
Sign up to receive it directly in your inbox, it's free!
7/7
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The chart shows the distribution of the rolling monthly changes in 5y forward, 5y US real yields since 2012: the red dots represent most of the latest observations, which are all concentrated in the deep right tail.
And it matters!
1/5
Long-term risk-free real yields move higher for two reasons.
1) The economy is cyclically improving (early 2021), and some structural tailwinds are priced in too
2) Risk premia need to be repriced higher as monetary policy will be tightened aggressively (now)
2 is bad...
2/5
...for risk assets.
A highly leveraged economy disproportionately suffers from higher real rates due to higher risk premia and monetary policy tightening rather than because of a strong cyclical growth impulse.
The pace of change matters too: you see all these red dots?
3/5
Let's kick it off with a short thread on the different forms of money out there - there is still so much confusion on this!
If you don't understand money, you can't connect the macro dots correctly.
1/13
Interbank money and real-economy money.
That's your easy way to think about what operations are (at least short-term) inflationary and which ones are asset-price-inflationary only.
Interbank money never reaches the real economy.
Never.
2/13
Who prints real-economy money?
If the govt spends more than it plans to collect taxes for, new money has been created.
A bank making a new loan literally credits your account out of nowhere.
This is how real-economy, spendable money gets created.
A very dovish Powell, but he is making a communication mistake here.
A thread on the Fed!
1/13
The key (and conflicting) headlines were:
*Inflation is much too high, but we we have the resolve it takes to bring it down and the American economy is well positioned to handle tighter monetary policy
BUT
*The committee is not actively considering 75 bps hikes
Ehm...
2/13
Powell downplayed the Q1 GDP negative print and referred to the 2 job openings per unemployed person to signal how tight is the labor market.
Again there was nothing, absolutely nothing weak he could see about the US economy.
The US mortgage payment to rent ratio has reached the highest level in 10 years
Due to the sharp increase in house prices coupled with mortgage rates going to the moon, consumers are now looking at a median mortgage payment of $1,750 vs $1,300 median asking rent
A short thread
Prices are defined by the equilibrium reached by new marginal buyers & sellers
It's very clear that the new US real estate marginal buyers are showing signs of distress: the number of mortgage applications to purchase houses is dropping rapidly
What about new marginal sellers?
So far, sellers are retreating fast too: the active listings of home sales are down 19% YoY.
51% of all US homeowners have a mortgage rate locked in around 4%, which is perhaps discouraging them to sell their property as buying another one would increase their monthly bills.
There is so much to unpack in global macro and fixed income markets.
Time for a thread!
1/12
Bond markets are pushing risk assets and the economy on a discovery: what's the highest equilibrium yields you can take before a severe growth slowdown or a proper risk asset meltdown?
Here is the chart for the Fed Funds terminal rate (highest point in the hiking cycle).
2/12
3.32% Fed Funds priced in by summer 2023: wow!
But what about long-end, forward yields?
Those are moving higher too: curves remain inverted, but the ''Fed has to cut from 2024 onwards'' mood has dwindled a bit.
Fed Funds in 2032 are now priced at 2.6% vs 2% few weeks ago
I can't wait for Sunday, when my buddy @AndreasSteno and myself are going to release the premiere episode of The Macro Trading Floor!
This podcast is going to be fun, educational and actionable: one macro investment idea per week!
How is it going to work, exactly?
1/8
We will start with an intro session where Andreas and I will go through:
- The worst take of the week
- Market and macro developments, and what opportunities we see across asset classes
Expect plenty of banter!
Wait a second, what's the ''worst take of the week''?
2/8
We will have some fun as we go through imaginary lines drawn on log-charts, famous investors misusing the word arbitrage (Cathie, I'm talking about you!) and people just having poor macro takes.
Sometimes it's gonna be Andreas picking on me too, I know that already... :)
3/8