#PhysicsFactlet (331)
"Anderson localization" is a weird phenomenon that is not well known even among Physicists, but has the habit of popping up essentially everywhere.
An introductory thread 🧵
1/
The idea of "localization" originally came about as an explanation (by P.W. Anderson, hence the name) of why the spins in certain materials did not relax as fast as expected.
nobelprize.org/prizes/physics…
2/
What Anderson realized was that when you have a wave (in this case a quantum mechanical wavefunction) that propagates in a random system, interference can play a major role, and potentially impede propagation completely.
journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10…
(Paywalled)
3/
The original paper (and, frankly, most of the literature on the subject) is pretty impenetrable, but thankfully Anderson localization can happen any time we have a wave and a random medium, doesn't matter what kind of wave, so we can try to look at a simple system.
4/
Let's start VERY simple with the simple pendulum, and let's make it even simpler by assuming the oscillations are small, and thus we only have to deal with an harmonic oscillator.
5/
The pendulum has a natural frequency (i.e. the frequency at which it will naturally oscillate if you just let it go), which will depend on its length and the gravity acceleration pulling it down: ω₀= √(g/L).
6/
If you take a bunch of such pendula, they will all oscillate with the same natural frequency.
Let's complicate the problem a bit and add a (elastic) coupling between the pendula.
7/
The system in its entirety now will have a number of natural frequencies equal to the number of pendula, resulting in a complex motion that is the superposition of the oscillations at all those different frequencies.
8/
Let's complicate the system again and make the mass of one of the pendula different. At first sight not much has changed: we still have the same number of natural frequencies (they just moved a bit), and the overall motion is the superposition of all those oscillations
9/
To get a better feeling at what the different mass did, we can look at the eigenmodes of the system, i.e. at those collective oscillations that don't change over time.
The different mass did change a bit the eigenmodes (shown, the lowest energy one)
10/
With just one mass changed just a little bit the difference is not enormous, but the heavier pendulum tends to oscillate a bit less, and the ones on the sides tend to oscillate a bit more.
11/
Ok, so what it is going to happen if we change all the masses at random?
At first sight the answer might look to be again "not much": we still have the same number of natural frequencies, and the overall motion is the superposition of all those oscillations.
12/
It is looking at the eigenmodes that the true difference becomes apparent (again, showing the lowest energy eigenmode here).
Most of the masses are essentially not moving, and all the oscillation is concentrated in a small area.
13/
This is the meaning of the term "localization" in "Anderson localization". The presence of randomness is not just scrambling the natural frequencies and distorting the eigenmodes a bit, it is changing their nature dramatically!
14/
What happens if the "disorder" is strong enough and your system is big enough, is that the eigenmodes of the system start shrinking, becoming more and more peaked around a particular position (a different one for each mode).
15/
If the disorder is not very strong, or the system is not very big, most of the modes will be quite wide, and they will overlap with each other. In this case any excitation will couple to a large number of modes, and you will see the excitation travel around as you expect.
16/
But if you have a lot of disorder and the system is big enough, the modes will be very narrow and won't overlap very much. As a result any excitation will couple to only a few, and the excitation won't be able to propagate very far.
17/
(Remember: how far you can propagate depends on how far the modes you excited extend.)
Therefore energy in a "Anderson localized" system can't easily propagate very far, which explains why the spins Anderson was studying had troubles relaxing.

18/
Anderson localization is still an active field of research, with still both theoretical and experimental open questions (and people arguing at conferences). And it is a LOT more complicated than this super-simplified description might make you think 😉
19/19 THE END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jacopo Bertolotti

Jacopo Bertolotti Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @j_bertolotti

Jan 3
#TheLongRoadToLearnSomethingNew
I decided it is high time I learn something about machine learning. I couldn't care less about learning how to use Tensorflow or any other package that do machine learning for you. I "just" want a Physicist's intuition for how and why it works.
1/
A million years ago I asked here for advices on resources. Some were very good advices, some were not. But I am mow armed with a textbook, and will irregularly update here on my progresses.
2/
I am not very far on my path. I've read a few online resources and (so far) the first 30 pages of this book.
I am aware machine learning is a HUGE topic, so I will begin by concentrating on neural networks (and probably a sub-sub-class of neural networks).
3/ Image
Read 11 tweets
Dec 31, 2021
#PhysicsFactlet The ones I am most proud of from 2021 (in chronological order)
A visualization of what an eigenvector is (at least for 2x2 matrices)
Pulse chirping (keeping the pulse duration constant for ease of visualization, although in reality one usually keeps the bandwidth constant)
Read 8 tweets
Dec 10, 2021
#PhysicsFactlet (308)
There are not many problems in Physics that can be solved exactly, so we tend to rely on perturbation theory a lot. One of the problems with perturbation theory is that infinities have the bad habit of popping up everywhere when you use it.
(A thread 1/ )
If you know anything about Physics you are probably thinking about quantum field theory and all the nasty infinities that we need to "renormalize". But quantum field theory is difficult, so let's look at a MUCH simpler problem: the anharmonic oscillator.
2/
Disclaimer: I can't know how much you (the reader) know about this. For some of you this thread will be full of obvious stuff. For others there will be so many missing steps to be hard to follow. I will do my best, but I apologize with everyone in advance.
3/
Read 24 tweets
Nov 23, 2021
In celebration of 10k followers, here is a new edition of "people you should follow, but that (given their follower count) probably you don't".
i.e. people I follow, with <5k followers, non-locked, active, that in my personal opinion you should follow too.
1/
In random order:
@LCademartiriLab food, chemistry, architecture, and beauty in general. Trigger warning: strong opinions.
@VKValev bit of history of Physics + chiral media
@DrBrianPatton social justice in science
@alisonmartin57 weaving and bamboo structures
2/
@VergaraLautaro history of Physics
@PKoppenburg LHCb
@OptoLia optics, entrepreneurship.
@BrunoLevy01 fluid simulations
@lisyarus physics-based graphics coding
@RobJLow mathematics and education
@bruko Photography (and overall great human being)
3/
Read 8 tweets
Oct 28, 2021
#PhysicsFactlet (299)
Fractional derivatives: a brief tutorial/🧵. If you know some calculus you should be able to follow. If you are a Mathematician (or you like to see things done properly) I advise "Fractional Differential Equations" by I. Podlubny instead 😉
1/
The history of fractional derivatives begins together with the history of the much more common integer-order derivatives, and a number of big names in mathematics worked on it over the centuries.
Afaik, the first to work on the problem was Leibniz himself.
2/
Since differentiating twice a function yields the second derivative, the Marquis de l'Hôpital immediately wondered whether it makes sense to think about an operator which, if applied twice, gave the first derivative, i.e. some sort of derivative of order 0.5
3/
Read 23 tweets
Jun 23, 2021
#PhysicsFactlet (283)
Lorentz transformations pre-date Special Relativity. How is that even possible?
A thread.

Trigger warning for typos (hopefully just in the text and not in the equations) and carefree manipulations of equations 😉
1/
The historical route is interesting but complicated, so I will leave that story for someone more qualified to write it. What I want to look at is: how do we get the Lorentz transformations without knowing anything about special relativity?
2/
A requirement we want all physical theories to satisfy is the "principle of relativity", i.e. the fact that the laws of Physics are the same in every frame of reference. Were this not the case, each of us would experience a different universe, making life quite complicated.
3/
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(