1/ Beyond the perfect game: exploring #baseball rules through insnaely good #pitching.
2/ Perhaps the entry level of good #pitching in #baseball is the shut out - no batter rounds the bases and no points are scored.
3/ One level above is the no-hitter: the game is complete yet no batter gets a hit. Theoretically, and in practice, your team can still lose! sportingnews.com/us/mlb/news/pi…
7/ We define the immaculate game as one where all 27 batters strike out in exactly 81 pitches.
8/ Don't stop reading - there's more! The next level is the "cosmic" game (my term).
9/ In a cosmic game, all 27 batters retire in less than 81 pitches - tagged out, pop flies, etc.
10/ You can even rank cosmic games by degree - cosmic 34 means only 34 pitches thrown.
11/ Of course, the ultimate cosmic game is only 27 pitches. Imagine a parade of batters who pop out one pitch.
12/ Then we have the last level: the transcendental game: a game where a picther retires all batters on *less* than 27 pitches. How is that even possible?
13/ In most baseball leagues, you can be out for using an altered or illegal bat, verbal interference/harrassment or batting out of order. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Out_(base…
14/ One can acheive a transcendental game by throwing only 1 pitch to most batters and having a few get tossed on technical grounds.
15/ Like cosmic games, we can have degrees of transcendental games. E.g., transcendental 12 means only 12 pitches thrown.
16/ Finally, we have the ultimate transcendental game where only zero pitches are thrown. How is that possible?
17/ You guessed it - all 27 batters got out via illegal bats or verbal interference. Thus, not a single pitch is thrown but the game is played to nine innings!
18/ Bottom line: Don't settle for less - perfection is only the beginning!!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ This thread will be about DuBois, national socialism, and Hitler.
2/ In July 1941, W.E.B. DuBois published an 6 page article in the Journal of Negro Education presenting his view of the European war. I will provide background then summarize, read closely, and comment on this article. To download, click here: jstor.org/stable/2292742…
3/ Background: The JoNE published an annual yearbook where leading writers were invited to comment on issues of the day. Chas. H Thompson asked people to reflect on the European war especially as it relates to repressed people. jstor.org/stable/2292735…
1/ We’re going to talk about DuBois’ Stalinism and his broader authoritarian streak.
2/ Background: DuBois scholars have long known that DuBois was a huge Stalin fan, right up to the end of his life. But the topic has been downplayed and avoided in many circles.
3/ Why is this important to explore? Historically, you want the most robust and truthful account of someone’s life - warts and all.
1/ Nitty gritty workflow management tips for academically minded folks.
2/ Background: Last week, I explained how to build an academic career without going bananas. This week, I'll give a few "micro tips" about workflow. As usual, take with a grain of salt - nothing works for everyone.
3/ Tip #1: Every two months or so, I make a google doc with a name like "Stuff to do in June 2021." And I mercilessly list all activities from the smallest to the biggest.
3/ Perhaps the most fundamental problem is that peer review is not reliable in the sense that peer reviews are weakly correlated with each other. A famous study by Peters and Ceci is a great example...
1/ Why is "framing" and lit review so contentious in sociology? A thread for #soctwitter and assorted bystanders.
2/ Last week, our department had a very nice panel where faculty answered questions publishing. Panel included current/former editors/deputy editors of ASR, AJS, Contexts, Soc of Ed, SPQ and more. (Yes, our dept is super professional and service oriented).
3/ Most advice was simple and intuitive: keep revising, show your work, read the journal you submit to, take rejection in stride, accept the randomness of reviews, etc. BUT the discussion of framing and lit review was long and complex.