Public attitudes in the current phase of the pandemic have taken on elements of magical thinking, often encouraged by those with the most influence.
Four components of this magical thinking are 1) changing the meaning of words, 2) scapegoating, 3) ritual, and 4) prophecy.
1) Changing the meaning of words, which could be called spells or magic words, involves mobilizing language to mystify, but also making acceptable what should be unacceptable. Here are a few examples:
"Learning to live with it" means accepting high levels of death and suffering.
"Mild" means it doesn't put you in hospital.
"Back to normal" (a phrase laden with ableism anyways) means things will never be the same again.
"Endemic" means ongoing mass infection.
"You have to live your life" means ignoring the predictable consequence of your actions.
2) Scapegoating is magical thinking in the sense that it is irrational, but it is functional in that it allows a society to shift blame and "move on" from some crisis.
Scapegoating has happened throughout the pandemic, earlier directed at "covidiots" and "the unvaccinated."
Now, scapegoating is being directed at those continuing to be cautious and unwilling to take part in the "new normal." They are at times even blamed for the continuation of the pandemic, and absurdly told they "might as well get it over with" or they risk being "left behind."
3) Ritual is part of the trend of magical thinking and involves public displays of affiliation with the attitudes of "learning to live with it."
Rituals can be as simple as the refusal to mask, which marks insiders and outsiders of the group.
Other rituals include the public declaration of affiliation, such as attending and sharing photos of social events with no precautions, even as there is ongoing and widespread infection. Such rituals are encouraged by similar televised events of those with the most influence.
4) Prophecy is a component of magical thinking involving foretelling a future in which COVID is not a concern. This has happened throughout the pandemic but intensified over the past year.
Experts or people with influence say that by some date "COVID will be over."
Vaccines were said to end the pandemic. Herd immunity was said to end the pandemic. Supposedly weaker variants would end the pandemic. And so on.
All sorts of prophecies never panned out, but those making the prophecies were still given the microphone again.
These and other components of magical thinking infiltrated public attitudes for several reasons, chief among them the political failure to adequately address the pandemic.
In the absence of reasonable political leadership. magic and myth become acceptable alternatives for many.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's how "the new normal" works: no one gets to have anything because some people insist on having everything.
Some people insisted on having everything in the old normal, too. But at least then there was a little bit for enough people that it was tolerable.
Let's get specific.
Now, when executives insist on having everything for short-term profits, it means revving up the economy to full steam.
That spreads the virus and eventually has the opposite effect, as workers and consumers get sick, die, or become disabled.
Now, when the socialite insists on living it up, it's not just about going to brunch or for a haircut. It's also the club every weekend and the all-inclusive in Cancun.
That spreads the virus and means no one can socialize.
The current "let it rip" phase of the pandemic took the ethics of collective care and turned it upside-down.
Whereas previously the idea was to protect "the vulnerable," the current approach hinges on exclusion and disposability so that society can "move on."
Terms like "vulnerable" and "comorbidities" describe those who are not paradigm citizens according to ability, age, gender, and race.
Such language promotes disposability, as when the CDC director found it "encouraging" mostly people with comorbidities died in the Omicron wave.
The disposability of anyone who is not the ideal of productivity and health is not only encouraged but a relief, giving rise to cheering for mass infection in search of elusive "herd immunity" and seeing the sacrifice of vulnerable people as an acceptable loss.
Here in the "learning to live with it" phase of the pandemic, there is a rapidly evolving prohibition on ethical action.
By design or by default, almost everyone is implicated in mass infection, making it impossible to enact an ethics of collective care.
Part of this is rooted in the shift to understanding COVID as a risk for individuals to manage.
Telling people to manage their own risks, paired with the abandonment of all public health measures, increases the risks and marginalization of vulnerable people.
The individual management of a public health crisis is not only absurd but effectively prohibits ethical action, in the sense that people are compelled to act in ways that endanger and restrict the choices of others.
A perverse trend happening now is the shaming of people exercising caution and blaming them for the continuation of the pandemic.
Absurd as this trend is, it serves a social function and has precedents in earlier stages of the pandemic.
It takes different forms, ranging from direct confrontations (i.e. about masks) to microaggressions (i.e. saying it is time to “move on"). It includes peer pressure, coercion, gaslighting, and blameshifting.
The way it functions socially has a lot in common with scapegoating.
Many people have the idea, promoted by their own governments and other interests, that "enough is enough."
The last two years are perceived as an unfair punishment, and they desperately want it to be over, so much so that they will embrace denial and absurdity.
It’s shocking to witness the callousness of this “learning to live with it” phase of the pandemic, but it really shouldn’t come as a surprise.
It is, in fact, just more of the same as what’s been happening for two years: a general failure of ethical action.
The difference, though, is now the callousness is unmasked, figuratively and literally. It's the same failures of common decency, now expressed openly and in some cases triumphantly.
In my new book, I suggest the current phase of the pandemic is the most brutal because it shows who will be sacrificed in the name of learning to live with it.
The brutality is also shown in the eagerness of so many to directly or indirectly sacrifice others.