Hey Elon. If you're so concerned about fake accounts, start here:
Who, exactly, are the people behind $TSLA propaganda account @WholeMarsBlog? Why is it such a secret? Do you or Tesla compensate them in any way, or have you ever?
@WholeMarsBlog When you've answered that, please also explain why you hired Vivien Hantusch to work in your personal office at $TSLA, despite the fact that she operated multiple Twitter accounts on which she willfully failed to disclose her employment with Tesla, Inc.'s German subsidiary.
@WholeMarsBlog When you've answered that, please explain why @Manic_Marge, aka Margaret Kluz, aka Margaret Duszkiewicz, who used to work at a Scion dealership in marketing, now tweets about you and $TSLA exclusively 24/7. Does that seem like an "authentic" account to you? Who pays her?
When you've answered that, please explain exactly what was going on here. $TSLA
Jerome Powell, a lawyer, has a bad habit of sending e-mails with no subject. He does this to evade his obligations under FOIA. So we filed a FOIA request for all of his e-mails with the subject "No subject," or no subject."
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System was predictably unamused. They rejected the FOIA request as not "proper," insisting that it lacked "a context or subject matter for the electronic search." Here's their rejection letter.
This is an important lawsuit that has escaped the notice of the press because West Virginia state courts generally do not post court documents electronically. We had to request them. Discovery could reveal more about the Murdoch empire.
Tucker Carlson likely gets much of his ideological inspiration from Peter Brimelow, one the plaintiffs in this lawsuit, who has worked formally for Carlson's boss, Rupert Murdoch. The other plaintiff is Brimelow's supposed non-profit hate group.
This is so bizarre. The court order establishing that Musk lied to investors and acted with scienter is still under seal, but Musk and friends want to appeal it, so now they're quoting from it in public even though it's still under seal. $TSLA
Although it is not considered a direct conflict, Judge Lewis Liman, who has now been assigned to United States Securities Exchange Commission v. Musk and Tesla, Inc., owned $ARKK in 2018. $TSLA
But this is a bit more problematic. Less than a year ago, Judge Liman disclosed that he owns $TSLA shares directly. He must recuse himself, and should have already.
Here's the evidence in the public domain thus far linking Elon Musk and Jeffrey Epstein / Ghislaine Maxwell.
1. Business Insider reported that $TSLA Director Kimbal Musk, Elon's brother, was set up with a former girlfriend by Epstein. businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstei…
2. According to BuzzFeed, Musk attended a dinner held by Epstein and frequented by a number of other tech titans, including Jeff Bezos and of course, Bill Gates, who ended up getting divorced from Melinda Gates in large part over Epstein. buzzfeednews.com/article/petera…
3. In 2019, The New York Times reported that Jeffrey Epstein was "advising Tesla’s embattled chief executive, Elon Musk, who was in trouble after announcing on Twitter that he had lined up the funding to take Tesla private." nytimes.com/2019/08/12/bus…
Between April 1 and April 5, Elon Musk lost an important motion in federal court—in secret. As you can see, Document 387 is missing from the docket. As of today, we know it's a court order from Judge Chen that was lodged under seal. $TSLA
On April 6th, Judge Chen tried to clarify what had happened with Document 387 in entry 390, but he left out some extremely important detail only filled in today with the plaintiffs' TRO motion.
This is a very big deal. Elon Musk went into his media blitz, including the TED interview, knowing that a federal judge had ruled against the very thing he was telling the public. But since the order was and remains (for now) secret, no one else knew (except the plaintiffs).