THREAD: 1/ A year ago today, at nearly 10 pm at night, @Uni_of_Essex emailed @GoonerProf and myself in which the VC apologised for the unlawful treatment we received.
2/ To recap: in Dec 2019, a seminar I was due to give - one which I was invited to give and where the subject was negotiated in advance was postponed then cancelled by a group of academic staff & students accusing me of transphobia. I was then blacklisted by Sociology Dept.
3/ The seminar was based on research that was later published in the Howard Journal.
4/ I was engulfed in a media storm I was ill-prepared for given that I had only just had major spinal surgery 5 days previously and my mother had passed away less than 5 weeks previously.
5/ I was told by ex-colleagues not to discuss/email about the apology because it might upset them. Strange because I would have thought that an external report vindicating me and saying that it was not reasonable to conclude that I was transphobic would have been good news.
6/ My podcast interview with @julianvigo about it and the overreach of @stonewalluk was later used against me in a public harassment campaign that eventually lead to my claim against @OpenUniversity
7/ I came on to the radar of several repugnant twitter accounts and received tweet replies saying that my views were the same as being a holocaust denier along with other accusations and claims that were beneath contempt.
8/ Then later @Uni_of_Essex VC apologised to his LGBTQi community for apologising to me during Pride Month.
FFS, I am a lesbian and it was MY month too.
9/ @Uni_of_Essex invited me back but the original invitation was without much notice and for a zoom seminar only. Further invitations were made, but the conditions placed on them were such that they were not commensurate with the original invitation.
10/ Between the hollow apologies from an institution that took pride in "going beyond the law" (sarcastic thanks to @stonewalluk for corrupting UK public institutions and genuine thanks to @BluskyeAllison for taking them to court) and....
11/ ... the silencing, harassment, discrimination and eventual constructive dismissal from academic colleagues at @OpenUniversity, I lost faith in myself, academia, my colleagues and everything I thought I had worked so hard for.
12/ Now, a year later, I offer these thoughts:
@stonewalluk is a cancer corroding women's and lesbian lives.
Academics putting @stonewalluk's HR policies above ethics & their responsibilities to ensure academic freedom are children playing with matches in houses of tinder.
13/ Those at @Uni_of_Essex who cancelled me played the worse possible hand because their misogynistic tactics only served to strengthen my resolve.
The 12 fact thread posted as response to @zoesqwilliams is based on fact and professional criminological argument. It generated attention so, I'm reposting the blogs and articles from which thread was taken.
Happy reading.
2/ Written to my academic criminological colleagues but for everyone to read. Has facts and numbers taken from official sources regarding sexual offending of transgender prisoners jophoenix.substack.com/p/what-do-we-s…
3/ Written as a blog about why risk calculations in prison placement policy is strange - has facts and figures about risks
1/ Many of us having been saying this for a long time. A new player into the discussion is @James_Treadwell. Please read his tweets on the problems of self-Id in prison. And the replies
1/ I’m announcing I’ve been constructively dismissed from The Open University & I’ll be adding that to my claim in the Employment Tribunal. W/ reluctance I’ve increased crowdfunder target to £150K. W/ greater reluctance, I’m again asking for help. bitly.com/ProfPhoenix
3/ The OU placed unreasonable demands on me. They failed to take my grievance seriously. They expected me to wait for more than 6 months for an outcome despite knowing the toll it was taking on my health and capacity to do my job.
A little thread on the attempt to restrict freedom of speech and academic freedom in Universities today.
It has been a few months now since we launched the Gender Critical Research Network and since a concerted & targeted campaign was launched by staff and students of the OU.
That campaign IS targeted and ongoing. There is one open public letter organised by OU academic staff and signed by over 360 staff OU staff accusing @OUGCN of being transphobic by highlighting a podcast *I* did. There are two open statements on uni servers making similar claims.
A local @oubucu email was sent around to all local union members promoting the open letter that contained a bad faith & ERRONEOUS precis of my Savage Minds podcast (I talked about Essex and my concerns about @stonewalluk strategies) to claim I& OUGCRN members are transphobic
1. I am sure you have not thought through your position here. Are you saying that in debate anyone can say anything as long as one does not make an *actual* threat? So, what about all that verbal abuse that minoritised individuals experience (racist, anti-semitic and so on).
2. Is verbal abuse okay because it is not an ACTUAL threat? How about the demeaning abuse that some parents met out to their children? If that is not an actual threat is it okay? Or what about that threats that women and girls receive ALL THE BLOODY TIME from the violent men
3.... who are in their lives. Are these 'understandable' because they are not ACTUAL threats.
I find it shocking that any person (much less one supporting a minoritised group's rights) can say that threats of violence are 'understandable' as long as they are not actual threats.