Okay Vogue, but if we believe all women, shouldn't we also believe Dr. Curry, Depp's sister, Kate James, Gina Deuters, Depp's exes...? How does this work if they say opposing things? *universe implodes* #DeppvsHeard (Via: vogue.com/article/why-it…) 
Believing all women is stupid. It's also totally sexist. It's implying women can't lie, women can only be victims. I prefer listening to both parties, looking at their evidence and THEN decide who I believe. "Believe all women" is an insult to women and their intelligence.
Vogue wants us to just believe the women who testified under oath yesterday that these were two different pics, one with the vanity light on, and one without. She also wants us to believe she doesn't know how to edit pics on her phone.
https://twitter.com/garlicbreadben/status/1526591922298421248
With more and more unbelievable statements and nasty recordings coming out, people start to question her narrative. Mind you, she was generally believed from 2016 on. It's not like she wasn't heard at all. But it just doesn't make sense.
Also, to frame this trial as a display of misogyny is so lazy and wrong. We've seen amazing women like lawyer Camille Vasquez and mental health expert Dr. Curry at work. People don't dislike Amber because she's a woman. It's because her grandiose stories just don't add up.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
