People typically associate apps with smartphones (in definition apps are just programs designed to execute tasks that don't run the computer itself). But apps are common in premodern books.
A 🧵 on app technology in this book from 16th-century England!/1
The book is known commonly as Frank Adams's Writing Tables, as can be seen on the title page here. This copy is in the Houghton Library, and it's especially famous for two things: its erasable pages and the survival of its original stylus. /2
And the erasable tables are the subject of an excellent article published in 2004, which you can find here. jstor.org/stable/3844198 /4
More on those erasable tables in a bit. Those may have been a unique (or desirable, at least) selling point of this book. But it's not the only attraction. As you can see from the table of contents this handy thing compiles what we can think of as 11 apps. /5
Interestingly enough, the table of contents differs from the actual contents of this copy, as you can see here. One question I asked when I was researching this book was: were the contents fungible, printed separately & sold in pieces? That is, were these apps customizable? /6
To get into bibliographical weeds, one way I was able to answer this Q was through collation, which I've pictured here. The collation tells us that most components were not created separately because several different items ("apps") are contained within the same gathering. /7
Between that and evidence from other copies, it seems clear that Adams was responsible for rearranging the contents over many editions, but that he kept the table of contents the same. /8
So what about these apps? And why call them that? I'll start with my favorite, which is a currency table, woodcut images of coins from different regions throughout Europe. Click the ALT description to read the preface to this part of the book! /9
Another app in the book is a navigation app. This one outlines the distance, in miles, from numerous towns in England to London, grouped as itineraries with different origin points. Note the claim to improvement in the heading here: LARGER AND BETTER MANNER! /10
But, with or without customization, any mass-produced commodity works to produce its audience, generating a shared identity. This is particularly evident in the book, which appears to have been made chiefly for merchants. And that shared identity isn't neutral. /11
See, for ex, this page from the app that contains a description & history of England & Wales. The geographical descriptions that one encounters heave with pride for England, and despair at the loss of greatness, particularly w respect to trade policy. /12
The "our" here is an important possessive, aligning the reader w the author & a broader English nation defined by its valuable commodities. This voice establishes a "we" & exploits its own anonymity as the source of its uncontestable authority. /13
Literally in the middle of these printed formulas for a merchant's savoir faire, is a space for their own hand. Designed for practicality, for jotting down notes, are the erasable tables, and w a metalpoint stylus tucked into the binding. /14
Here's another view of the erasable table, made from thick paper coated in gesso and glue. And here is also a view of the binding with the compartment for the stylus. You can just make out the head of the stylus poking out of its compartment in between the now broken clasps. /15
I mentioned that this book has 11 "apps," but its contents feature 12 items. That's bc an app executes a task *not* related to a computer's function. One of the "programs" in this book IS related to its function: the instructions for erasing the tables shown here. /16
There's much more to say about this book full of 16th-century "apps"! As a book historian I think of any book, whether print or manuscript, as rich with potential for so many different lines of inquiry. Here are some of the questions I might start out asking about this book. /fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hello! I'm an art historian who researches the 15C coinage of England! These headlines are not only sensationalist; they also participate in a longstanding effort to date as early as possible Euro presence on & further legitimize claims to this continent. /1
The story is that someone found a coin in Newfoundland from the reign of Henry VI, minted btn 1422-1427. To the credit of those who wrote this press release, they make no claim as to the coin’s presence suggesting Euros arriving in Canada at that time. gov.nl.ca/releases/2022/… /2
We leave that to journalists who like to misrepresent history and create harmful popular narratives, as here in the CNN piece. /3 cnn.com/style/article/…
🧵 One of the things I do is teach college students how to read old handwriting. Very, very old handwriting. This field is known as paleography. If handwriting didn't change over time, this part of my job would be unnecessary. So, some thoughts on top of these ones. /1
Perennial commentary abt the decline of instruction in cursive often makes several assumptions.
Assumption 1: cursive is one thing
Assumption 2: cursive gives us access to history
Assumption 3: cursive has prestige
Assumption 4: this educational lapse is new
/2
Assumption 1 (cursive is one thing) is fairly easy to dispute on two counts. First, in the context of American education, there have been several waves of different kinds of favored cursive, whether the Palmer D'Nealian, Zaner-Bloser etc. And all of these look different. /3
🧵 Medieval Manuscript Lesson of the Day. Canon Tables! A sophisticated form of textual technology, cross referencing, & theological argumentation all delivered in a beautiful and meaningful package—what we would today call graphic design. /1
The invention of canon tables is attributed to Eusebius of Caesaria in the 4th century CE to answer the need for correlation between the four Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke & John. Each of these tells the life of Christ, but they differ in order, content, & detail. /2
And yet, they are all true. The canon tables were invented both to aid readers in finding the passages in each of the Gospels that relate the same information *and* to facilitate the contemplative exercise of reconciling their truth as Scripture. /3
I always end my course "Romanesque & Gothic Art" w a lecture on the Black Death & Art of the Macabre. It was long believed that the macabre emerged in response to the plague, but art historians have argued against this myth. A🧵on why the macabre was NOT a response to plague. /1
Whenever I deliver lectures on the same topic across the years, I revise them. As one can imagine, this particular lecture has changed dramatically over the last 2 years. One thing that's changed has been my understanding of why busting the myths abt the macabre is important. /2
So, first: what is the macabre? Largely I lay it out for my students according to these four criteria, which are embodied by this rosary bead in the Met. metmuseum.org/art/collection… /3
I received this leaf as a gift a couple of years ago with almost no information included. So. How did I figure out what I got? A step-by-step guide. /1
Step 1 is eyeballing things. The leaf is relatively small, about the height of my hand (measurements can come at a later point; we’re just feeling things out here). And it’s in Dutch, so this puts me in the mindset of a private prayer book, probably from the 15th century. /2
Step 2. The Dutch Book of Hours in the Grote translation is online: dbnl.org/tekst/grot001g…… I do a search of a few phrases (medieval spelling's variable, so it takes a few tries w/different phrases). Finally a hit. It appears to be a Psalm from the Office of the Dead./3
One thing I’d like to highlight from near the end of our article is this, bc it’s precisely what these new researchers are reviving. I implore people to do just a casual search of Galton and see what horrors he wrought.
I want to point out that the authors of this paper are at Princeton & U Chicago. If you’ve read Ebony & Ivy you’ll know that US unis were not only founded on native dispossession, cultural genocide & slavery but also generated “scientific” research that “proved” white supremacy.