Just a coincidence, obviously, but in 2021 the WHO wargamed a scenario with a MONKEYPOX outbreak occurring in June 2022.

Let's see what were the learnings and red flags (thread)
One learning was that the current IHR 2005 regulations are getting in the way of pandemic preparedness.

A point I've been stressing since April 2020

pandemic.substack.com/p/the-2005-dec…
Another learning was that the WHO is not suited for origin investigation.

As we should have learned when they sent the largest-conflict-of-interest man in the world (Daszak) to investigate the Wuhan outbreak.
They stressed the importance of early action (duh) without waiting for casualties to take action.

Let's see if our countries will listen.
They suggested that governments use a trigger-based system.

I recommended such a thing under the name of "circuit breakers" back in February 2020: Luca-dellanna.com/circuit-breake…
You can read the full report here nti.org/wp-content/upl… nti.org/wp-content/upl…
They also suggested that universities and labs use stronger safety measures.

Important, as today I learned that Columbia university has no BSL-4 lab (i.e., high safety) and yet its researchers produced antiviral-resistant COVID strains, something that could put us in danger
A big red flag: a scenario in which a single country has 1421 monkeypox cases and no cases at all in the rest of the world (see first screenshot in the thread). That’s a serious underestimation of today’s hyperconnectivity.
Lot of people are reading this and think it’s evidence that monkeypox was planned by institutions. Not at all, let’s not embark in absurd conspiracy theories.

But: if the exercise was on a monkeypox epidemic, it’s because it was considered risky.

Also, this risk (2017 paper)👇

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Luca Dellanna

Luca Dellanna Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DellAnnaLuca

May 19
Taking about viruses changing, the #1 news from yesterday was that researchers in New York created antiviral-resistant COVID strains (how this is legal is beyond me)
Source: Bloomberg
Omg, the researcher who created the mutated COVID strain was Time Magazine's 1996 Person of the Year, we're fucked
Read 4 tweets
May 18
In today's news:
- monkeypox outbreaks in 3+ EU countries
- scientists created antiviral-resistant COVID strains in NYC

Still playing with fire ImageImage
Good thing we built a solid contact tracing infrastructure over the past two years

(I don’t know if I can say it with a straight face)
Read 4 tweets
May 17
As the WHO director is participating to the World Economic Forum, I hear claims that the WHO is a puppet of economic interests.

This is correct. And it's not a conspiracy theory, there are public documents proving it.

(thread)
In 2005, 194 countries updated the binding International Health Regulations (IHR) with the clause that unless the WHO recommends travel restrictions, other countries are supposed to refrain from imposing travel bans or trade restrictions on nations grappling with outbreaks
Read 14 tweets
May 17
13 RED FLAGS A SCIENTIST MIGHT BE A CHARLATAN

1. They use circular arguments.

2. They call factual objections “aggressions.”

3. They do not read studies before citing them.

4. They use “scientific consensus” as a justification.
5. They think that a large correlated n is a large n and not, in fact, a small n.

6. They use the terms “science” and “scientific community” interchangeably.

7. They are more concerned about who a person is than what they have to say.
8. They think that science should be informed by politics and truth by morals.

9. They “agree to disagree” on hard science topics rather than looking for the truth.
Read 7 tweets
May 17
A major piece of charlatanry, this article claims masks do not work.

And yet, most of the studies cited within using N95 conclude that N95 masks work (details below).

So, why the misleading headline, @PAlexanderPhD?

brownstone.org/articles/more-…
@PAlexanderPhD Study #9 (I use the numeration in the linked article) concludes N95 masks work, offering at least partial protection.

Study #11 concludes N95 "are still the recommended choice in mitigating airborne disease transmission indoors."

(I skipped #10 because it's not about N95)
@PAlexanderPhD Study #16 concludes that N95 offer lower protection against viruses than particles, but doesn't conclude they do not work.

Study #22 concludes that N95 masks are more effective than surgical and do offer some protection.
Read 9 tweets
May 16
Yesterday, I got asked what I meant when I said that "management consulting should focus on observing behaviors."

Here is what I meant

(thread)
In a company with poor management habits, a management consultant that comes up with a great strategic plan is likely to fail anyway, because the company lacks the managerial habits to effectively execute on the plan and, in general, operate the business.

Let me give an example.
Years ago, I consulted for a company whose managers' concept of delegation was "ask to do X"

No "communicate what success looks like"

No "say what's too little and what's too much"

No "probe correct understanding by asking to rephrase the task"

Setting people for failure
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(