In 2015 I decided on a whim to check out Tesla's battery swap station that was earning the company 9 figures in California ZEV credits, and found it wasn't real. Instead Tesla was using diesel generators to charge cars. Here's how this changed my life 🧵
Up to that point I had been skeptical that any startup automaker could succeed. That view wasn't about Tesla, it was about the car biz. But what I found at Harris Ranch was shocking, a cockroach, and I decided to follow a life-changing instinct: THERE IS NEVER JUST ONE COCKROACH.
Journalists are like investors, but instead of money they bet their time and effort. What I saw at the battery swap station was so at odds with the image of Tesla in 2015, I knew there was a good chance investing in scrutiny of Tesla would pay off. It did. benbellabooks.com/shop/ludicrous/
A year later I found another big cockroach: Tesla was hiding defects by requiring customers sign NDAs in exchange for free repairs. This cut off the auto safety regulator's only independent source of information about defects. This led to a couple of important lessons...
First: MUSK'S KEY SKILL IS CONTROLLING INFORMATION. It's not just crafting appealing narratives about himself and his companies, but also silencing anything that contradicts them. Tesla's entire history is lined with NDAs, backed by sheer terror of what Musk will do when cornered
That terror comes from another lesson: MUSK DOESN'T REFUTE, HE ATTACKS. I learned this after the NDA story, when an official Tesla blog post accused me of fabricating the reporting and doing so for financial gain. Zero evidence was offered to support this attack on my credibility
What happened next taught another lesson: MUSK FANS DON'T CARE ABOUT FACTS. I was mobbed by online attacks that could not be dissuaded or mitigated by facts. My claims had evidence and his didn't, yet hardly anyone knows my reporting and his 2016 lies are still repeated today.
My book made some key claims that have proven true: Tesla can't make affordable cars, Tesla can't make its "Full Self-Driving" work, Autopilot has real safety issues, Tesla is fundamentally weak on manufacturing, and more. Here's the hardest lesson: NONE OF THAT HAS MATTERED.
As I realized this, and as I realized that Musk and Tesla were on a trajectory toward increasingly implausible and fraudulent claims (which massively enriched Musk), I realized: TESLA IS NOT AN AUTOMOTIVE STORY, IT IS A CELEBRITY STORY. Faith in Musk personally was what mattered
Along my journey I have heard a lot of rumors, evidence of big cockroaches, that I chose not to hunt down because I wanted to cover the automotive/mobility tech story, not Musk's personal life. But his personal life, who he really is, is what actually matters here.
If Tesla printed cash like Amazon or Facebook, Musk's character and personality wouldn't matter. But Tesla has always been financially precarious and dependent on valuations based on Musk's dream weaving: saving the planet, self-driving cars, Mars colonies, etc
In short: TESLA IS A CONFIDENCE GAME. Confidence in one man and the image he so ruthlessly controls is what holds it all together. Understanding why Musk's dreams are bullshit is hard (learning about manufacturing and AI is cool though!), but anyone can grasp a person's character
Like all human behavior, journalism has crowd dynamics. Every cockroach killed motivates other cockroach hunters to mount up, but celebrity journalism takes this to a new level. EVERY CELEBRITY STORY IS THE SAME: FIRST THEY ARE BUILT UP, AND THEN THEY ARE TORN DOWN
If celebrity journalists smell Musk's blood in the water and start a feeding frenzy, they will find more cockroaches. Why? Because Musk's history makes one lesson undeniable: HE DOES NOT BELIEVE THE RULES APPLY TO HIM. That is the core belief of every abuser.
That is ultimately why my view has evolved from mere skepticism about Tesla as a business to a belief that Elon Musk demands firm justice: his impunity and ability to meme reality to his will is making his behavior worse all the time. HIS TRAJECTORY IS UNSUSTAINABLE.
Even more importantly: his abusive behavior, his impunity and the unfathomable wealth they have generated for him create incentives for everyone else to mimic his behavior. Even if you think Musk deserves special treatment, do you want a society where everyone acts like him?
To wrap up: HAPPY HUNTING CELEBRITY JOURNALISTS! This is the moment for you to prove that what you do is as important to society as any business or political journalism. Musk's personal life is a cockroach-rich environment, and your stories will have impact that mine never did.
I still think my reporting is important. Understanding cars, the car business, manufacturing, AI, autonomous driving tech and the other issues I cover in my book are critical to a better future. I hope more people choose to start learning about them now.
There's a fascinating thread here, where Elon seems to go nuts for anything Google is doing, and funds "competition" for their work based on the assumption that they are much farther along than they are. semafor.com/article/03/24/…
This is literally how Tesla ended up going into driving automation tech! Most people still don't know that Google developed a system called "AutoPilot"but didn't bring it to market based on the exact safety concerns plaguing Tesla's version thedrive.com/tech/29877/dr-…
The driving automation play and the AI play are different in some respects, but in both cases Musk was trying to "frontrun" competition with what he (mistakenly) thought were imminent Google monopolies. He's kind of an emerging tech squatter?
Here's the thing about automation: "understanding the technology" is barely half the battle. If you don't understand the work you're trying to automate, you'll never succeed. The people who proclaim rampant job loss from automation grok the tech, but are clueless about the jobs.
Driving automation technology is rampant with this flavor of cluelessness. People see a video and say "oh look, it's driving" without having the first clue about what driving in an economically valuable way entails (long-tail reliability, insurance, customer service, etc)
Right now the auto industry is planning to spend the technology dividend on Level 2 systems, which provide an enticing simulacrum of self-driving without delivering any actual proven safety benefits. That's where the money is, so never mind about safety I guess!
It doesn't have to be that way. Instead we could apply the performance improvements and cost reductions in driving automation tech to the systems we know deliver improved safety outcomes... which just happen to be the systems that don't pretend to be "self-driving."
I asked Midjourney to show me a Persian miniature of a robotaxi and it gave the thing a lidar dome that looks like a mosque 🥹
I've been having fun trying to understand how Midjourney imagines the term "robotaxi" in different contexts, so I'll continue to post the results in this thread.
Here we have one of my favorite examples of an ancient Egyptian robotaxi, complete with a massive infotainment system
The Oregon Trail sure ain't what it used to be, now that we got them self-driving Conestoga wagons, I'll tell you what.
It says a lot about the Tesla fandom that the response to revelations about Tesla's malfeasance is always "oh well every other automaker does this, you just never hear about it, and though I don't actually cite any sources just trust that I have looked into this."
Tesla has tried to do this itself, for example in its only public statement on my reporting about its record of environmental violations at Fremont.
I dug into their claims, and the comparison Tesla drew actually shows how much worse their record is thedrive.com/tech/28432/tes…
Fremont has some 47 Clean Air Act violations since it last settled some 30 violations with @AirDistrict in mid-2021. I challenge Tesla's defenders to name a single auto final assembly factory with a record that comes close to that. Just one! echo.epa.gov/detailed-facil…
The whole "this wasn't VCs, this was just SVB" narrative elides a major point of this whole episode: insularity concentrates risk in lots of ways. You think it was a coincidence that a bank so embedded in this specific ecosystem failed to hedge for higher interest rates?
Like, I guess it's probably a good thing that Silicon Valley didn't do all of it's Finding Out all at once (as much as some players might deserve it)... but let's not pretend we can or should prevent that Finding Out from happening in a more orderly fashion.
I have friends and acquaintances in Silicon Valley who are amazing people doing amazing work, and I wish them nothing but good things. But there were plenty of good people in Detroit, and that culture still had to undergo a major reckoning. And guess what? That pain was worth it.