1/ Monkeypox origin story. During the covid pandemic in May 2021, the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) and the Munich Security Council (MSC) convened an international pandemic war-game “Tabletop Exercise on Reducing High-Consequence Biological Threats.” nti.org/news/nti-bio-m…
2/ The scenario had participants imagine” a “global pandemic involving an unusual strain of Monkeypox,” a virus found in Africa, beginning one year later, on “May 15, 2022.”
3/ In typical pandemic war-game style, the biosecurity simulation script imagined catastrophic outcomes with over a quarter billion deaths worldwide from the genetically engineered monkeypox strain.
4/ Although the name sounds like it was written for a dystopian movie script, monkeypox is a real virus discovered in Africa in 1970; roughly 10% of cases are fatal.
5/ Then, in mid-May 2022, right on schedule, authorities in the real world reported outbreaks monkeypox in Europe, the U.K., the U.S., and Australia. The WHO convened an emergency meeting to address the outbreak a few days later.
6/ Fortune magazine reported on May 19 that “U.S. government places $119 million order for 13 million freeze-dried Monkeypox vaccines,” with an option to buy another $180 million, from biotech company Bavarian Nordic. fortune.com/2022/05/19/mon…
7/7 Technically, these were smallpox vaccines which are reported to be 85% effective against monkeypox.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Free speech matters not to ensure that every pariah can say whatever odious thing he or she chooses. Rather, free speech prevents the government from identifying every critic as a pariah whose speech must be shut down."
"The more insidious and powerful censorship happens when government pressures companies to change their terms of service and modify their algorithms to control what information goes viral and what information disappears down the memory hole....
1/ BREAKING: our lawyers were in court yesterday for Missouri v. Biden seeking a temporary injunction to halt the government's censorship industrial complex. In our petition, we explained how this regime has been functioning with the following analogy...
2/ Suppose that the Trump White House, backed by Republicans controlling both Houses of Congress, publicly demanded that all libraries in the United States burn books criticizing the President...
3/ ...and the President made statements implying that the libraries would face ruinous legal consequences if they did not comply, while senior White House officials privately badgered the libraries for detailed lists and reports of such books that they had burned...
1/ Beyond the obvious political considerations, there are deeper reasons why the media resisted exploring the lab leak hypothesis, and continue to drag their feet. The Covid pandemic challenged the mythos of perpetual progress through science and technology.
2/ It was clear from the beginning of the pandemic that many things--including big, scary things--remain fundamentally outside of human control & technological management. We have not, and will not ever, completely conquer these threats to human security and material well-being.
3/ Science and technology are enormous blessings when oriented toward human and social goods; but they are no panacea. When the ideology of scientism idolizes them as the last best hope of humankind, we are bound to be not only disappointed, but even threatened, by the results.
How to buy compliance at Universities, brought to you by Pfizer. The company donated almost $365K to the University of California Regents in 2021, another $250K to various UC programs. Gravy after much higher amounts for pharma-sponsored research grants. cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/resp…
The University of California for their part has millions of dollars of our retirement fund invested in Pfizer. See how this works?
To be clear, these financial entanglements do not require that either institution -- the university or the corporation -- involve nefarious or ill-intentioned actors. But these ties create structural dependencies that inevitably shape university policies in one direction.
Sitting in the airport recently I spotted a billboard advertisement that read, “You don’t have a people problem. You have a ‘how you’re using your people’ problem.
Automation can solve it.” The ad was sponsored by UiPath, a global software company that sells robotic process automation software.
With a play on the word robot (indicated by a robot cartoon) the ad featured the trademarked catchphrase “Reboot Work.” The ad presented automation as an icon of technological enchantment, endowing the human-replacing robot with quasi-magical liberating powers.
In the biosecurity surveillance paradigm, the human being is reduced to bare biological life—a mere collection of muscles, tendons, ligaments, and bones—with regrettable energy and excretion requirements.
In this framework, the human “machine” can be programmed to function with maximum efficiency: digital surveillance, sophisticated algorithms, and exquisitely refined behavioral conditioning turn human flesh into a productivity engine.
But like machines if you overuse them, the human body can malfunction. Not to worry, the technocrats reply, we can fine-tune the algorithm to bring each body to the brink of breakdown but not tip it over.