Some people think that these investigations will kill the convention. They won’t. If the convention dies it will be because of us, the members. Long ago we gave into apathy and we abdicated our role of safeguarding our institutions from wickedness.
How? When you read the Business and Financial Plan you see that safeguarding the institutions is not done just by the trustees, but by us the members. That’s why it the B&FP says members are to have access to certain documents and be able to attend certain meetings.
Instead we adopted, “trust the trustees” and when entities have refused to provide certain documents or publish where they are holding their open meetings, we have let them get away with it. We have effectively abdicated our role in the convention for all but 5 min a year
The trustee system though was broken. Although some of what happened through the CR has been deemed necessary by some, it created the blueprint for how groups could take control of the convention and turn the trustee system into little more than a collection of yes men.
When members started raising concerns, and those concerns started to be ignored by the trustees, some took to online spaces to raise awareness. Those were sometimes labeled divisive, but more often just ignored. After that happened we have seen lawsuits and this investigation.
This investigation cost us money, and it will likely cost us more. That’s not the investigations fault. It is ours as members. The powers that be, that have already games the trustee system, will not fix this problem. We have to fix it.
We as members can no longer be apathetic. We cannot lazily sit by, give our money, and pretend it is all good. We must demand that our entities abide by the Business and Financial Plan. We must call for them to publish the location of open meetings, not just the city.
We must hold our entities accountable for their performance and their people. At the #SBC22 annual meeting we must do business, not just a dog and pony show for each entity. Investigations will not kill our convention. It will be our apathy that kills us.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What Hunt did according to the SATF was wicked. However some people want to say his resignation was enough. It is not. As the @SBCExecComm meets today they should encourage @namb to allow for a similar investigation (3rd party and waive rights) and any other entity needed.
In Hunt’s position at NAMB as the SVP, Hunt was over T+B and other ministries for pastors and their wives. This was a similar situation to that reported in the SATF. NAMB also hired staff from Woodstock for Hunt, of which likely at least 1 knew of the 2010 incident.
Hunt was over leading all Evangelism and leadership for NAMB. He built teams under him while he was there. Who knows what kind of culture he created or if more is or was going on? Who knows if he other NAMB trustees or leaders knew about the 2010 incident but remained silent.
What you are going to see in the next few months is people in #SBC leadership that will want to pretend that Johnny Hunt’s resignation is sufficient. It is not. Through NAMB, he was given a position of power, ample opportunity, with staff that likely knew about the 2010 incident
Many of those people likely profit from @NAMB_SBC. How many have books handed out by NAMB, podcasts sponsored by NAMB, speaking engagements through NAMB, ambassador checks from NAMB, free use of houses owned by NAMB, their church planting bankrolled by NAMB?
How many have their own personal companies that have contracts with @NAMB_SBC? How many owe their current position to Hunt or NAMBs leadership? Remember Pittman’s church was primarily funded by Hunt when it was a plant.