Our Imam al-Shatibi goes about proving the existence of Allah ﷻ by saying that A'rad are contingent
Ibn Taymiyyah says this is inherited from the Jahmiyyah
al-Shatibi chooses Tafwid as the truth and the Madhab of the Salaf
Ibn Taymiyyah calls Tafwid the Madhab of the people of Tajhil
Shatibi says: The Mushabbiha affirmed Jawarih of eyes, hands, legs and face for Allah as well as a Jiha (direction). And these are all attributes of the creation.
He says more explicitly, that believing that Allah ﷻ is in a Jiha is an innovation that does not fall into Kufr according to one opinion!
We know al-Shatibi does Tafwid of the verses on Istiwa', but he also says that the Mushabbiha said these verses mean Allah ﷻ is sitting! تعالى علوا كبيرا.
Tafsir of these verses to mean sitting is one Madhab of the Wahhabis.
al-Shatibi denies Allah's Kalam being composed of sounds and letters and affirms Allah ﷻ's eternal uncreated Kalam Nafsi.
This is of course Tajahhum for them.
al-Shatibi when speaking about Ru'ya of Allah ﷻ in the Akhira, says this Ru'ya does not necessitate a Jiha, or the bouncing of light rays, or Allah being a Jism...
Pure Tanzih.
Meanwhile Ibn Uthaymeen when told that Ru'ya necessitates Allah being a Jism said: "Then let it be so."
Compare the Tanzih of al-Imam al-Shatibi to this catastrophe of Ibn Uthaymeen.
al-Shatibi says the verses of Istihza', Makr and Kayd are all metaphors.
Shatibi gives the Ash'ari interpretation of Love/Rida and Ghadab/Bughd in the right of Allah ﷻ and says they are either willing goodness for those who deserve or the goodness itself.
Ibn Uthaymeen in this clip calls this Tajahhum and a rejection of Allahs Sifat:
al-Shatibi chooses the Madhab of the Asha'ira in Hikma and Ta'lil
al-Shatibi counts the Hadith of Nuzul and the verse on Allah being Nur as metaphors..
More Tajahhum as Ibn Uthaymeen said
al-Shatibi chooses the Ash'ari position on Iman, says it is an action of the heart; Tasdiq.
Safar al-Hawali and the rest of the Wahhabis say the Asha'ira are Murji'a Jahmiyyah for this!
Shatibi agrees with the Asha'ira on Qadr and Kasb which the Wahhabis call us Jabriyyah for
Shatibi agrees with the Asha'ira on Tahsin and Taqbih that Wahhabis also disagree with us on
This and so much more makes it clear which side al-Shatibi was on. It is hysterical that this was even doubted.
This is the issue with the opposition, they try and excuse a scholar for his mistakes because he wrote useful works or they think he agrees with them on something.
Yet when a different Ash'ari like Razi or Amidi or Taftazani gives those same beliefs, they are shunned and insulted.
Hypocrisy.
Next they will say Bayhaqi, Ibn Asakir, Ibn Hajar, Nawawi and Suyuti weren't Asha'ira.
Stop claiming our scholars. You are a people without Asanid to the Sunnah, embrace it and move on. Realize this and wake up from your daze. Repentance is still possible.
ولا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله العلي العظيم.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What's the ruling on Alawites today? My grandfather asked Shaykh Mahmūd al-Rankūsī and he replied:
-We don't Takfīr them unrestrictedly
-We judge them based on their words
-Though we know their religion is Bātinī (secretive)
-And Bātinī religions are not worth a ṣirmāyeh (shoe)
The Shaykh's answer is comprehensive and very precise
It's important to distinguish between what we call Alawites today, and historical Nusayrīs
Nusayrism is undoubtedly riddled with Kufr beliefs, but few Alawites today still believe in it
Today being an Alawite is more an ethnicity than a religion. There is no uniform dogma they all follow
Some Alawites are "normal Muslims", according to them. Possibly like lay-Sunnīs
Some of them adopted 12er Shi‘ite views
And definitely some still believe in Bātinī Nusayrism
Dr. Ibrāhīm Shāsho, the newly appointed Muftī of Aleppo, was questioned in this interview about the future plans for the Syrian Awqāf and scholarly scene as a whole
His answers will disappoint a lot of the people living in their own fantasy who were flaunting his appointment:
He says very clearly: The Awqāf Ministry will (and does) represent the entire Syrian scene, in all its components and methodologies
No group (hinting at HTS-aligned figures) will have a monopoly over it at the expense of the rest
Dr. Shāsho states: The administration affirms that Syria will be built by its own sons. And it is known to all that the Ash‘arī school is the school of the vast majority in Syria... This is the reality, and with this reality we will achieve our goal of building the new Syria
Persecution of the Syrian (Sūfī) scholarly class by the Ba‘thists 🧵
Shaykh Hasan Habannakah (d. 1978) had multiple confrontations with Hafez and the Ba‘thists
Most notably is when he gave the famous Khutbah against state-sponsored authors who were insulting Islam
He was jailed as a result then released following the outbreak of civil unrest
Shaykh Abu al-Yusr ‘Abidīn (d. 1981) had altercations with Jamal Abd al-Nasir, but also later when he was removed from his position as Muftī of Syria (for the second time) after refusing to endorse the 1963 Ba‘thist coup
A lot of people are asking about the intra-Sunni dynamics in future Syria
What will happen to the local Ash‘aris? What is the new government's own leanings? Will they force anything on the public? Etc.
I will try my best to explain it in this thread
Syria was historically always Ash‘ari (and of course "Sufi" by extension). Starting with the Seljuks, then Zengids, Ayyubids, Mamluks, and finally Ottomans
Before that was the Abbasids where we start entering into the contested zone of history which both sides claim
This didn't change after the Ottomans fell. Look no further than the undisputed Syrian authority, Shaykh al-Sham Badr al-Din al-Hasani
Shaykh Badr (himself a major figure in the Syrian revolution against the French) had a large network of students that dominated the scene
Twelver Rāfidha are not disbelievers according to the relied upon view of most scholars from the different Fiqhī and ‘Aqadī schools, and declaring them disbelievers is a weak secondary opinion
The Rāfidha are a deviant Muslim group like the Mu‘tazila, Khawārij, Murji’a, etc.
Takfīr would be carried out on a case by case basis if necessary, such as how some Ghulāt claim that Jibrīl made a mistake in announcing Prophethood, accusing Lady A’isha of Zinā, or claiming the Qur’ān is corrupted
However these beliefs are rejected by normative Twelver Shī‘a
On the issue of accusing Sayyida A’isha of Zinā, for example, the Twelvers say that the wives of all Prophets cannot fall into Fāhisha to begin with as Allāh has prevented this from even occuring