Our Imam al-Shatibi goes about proving the existence of Allah ﷻ by saying that A'rad are contingent
Ibn Taymiyyah says this is inherited from the Jahmiyyah
al-Shatibi chooses Tafwid as the truth and the Madhab of the Salaf
Ibn Taymiyyah calls Tafwid the Madhab of the people of Tajhil
Shatibi says: The Mushabbiha affirmed Jawarih of eyes, hands, legs and face for Allah as well as a Jiha (direction). And these are all attributes of the creation.
He says more explicitly, that believing that Allah ﷻ is in a Jiha is an innovation that does not fall into Kufr according to one opinion!
We know al-Shatibi does Tafwid of the verses on Istiwa', but he also says that the Mushabbiha said these verses mean Allah ﷻ is sitting! تعالى علوا كبيرا.
Tafsir of these verses to mean sitting is one Madhab of the Wahhabis.
al-Shatibi denies Allah's Kalam being composed of sounds and letters and affirms Allah ﷻ's eternal uncreated Kalam Nafsi.
This is of course Tajahhum for them.
al-Shatibi when speaking about Ru'ya of Allah ﷻ in the Akhira, says this Ru'ya does not necessitate a Jiha, or the bouncing of light rays, or Allah being a Jism...
Pure Tanzih.
Meanwhile Ibn Uthaymeen when told that Ru'ya necessitates Allah being a Jism said: "Then let it be so."
Compare the Tanzih of al-Imam al-Shatibi to this catastrophe of Ibn Uthaymeen.
al-Shatibi says the verses of Istihza', Makr and Kayd are all metaphors.
Shatibi gives the Ash'ari interpretation of Love/Rida and Ghadab/Bughd in the right of Allah ﷻ and says they are either willing goodness for those who deserve or the goodness itself.
Ibn Uthaymeen in this clip calls this Tajahhum and a rejection of Allahs Sifat:
al-Shatibi chooses the Madhab of the Asha'ira in Hikma and Ta'lil
al-Shatibi counts the Hadith of Nuzul and the verse on Allah being Nur as metaphors..
More Tajahhum as Ibn Uthaymeen said
al-Shatibi chooses the Ash'ari position on Iman, says it is an action of the heart; Tasdiq.
Safar al-Hawali and the rest of the Wahhabis say the Asha'ira are Murji'a Jahmiyyah for this!
Shatibi agrees with the Asha'ira on Qadr and Kasb which the Wahhabis call us Jabriyyah for
Shatibi agrees with the Asha'ira on Tahsin and Taqbih that Wahhabis also disagree with us on
This and so much more makes it clear which side al-Shatibi was on. It is hysterical that this was even doubted.
This is the issue with the opposition, they try and excuse a scholar for his mistakes because he wrote useful works or they think he agrees with them on something.
Yet when a different Ash'ari like Razi or Amidi or Taftazani gives those same beliefs, they are shunned and insulted.
Hypocrisy.
Next they will say Bayhaqi, Ibn Asakir, Ibn Hajar, Nawawi and Suyuti weren't Asha'ira.
Stop claiming our scholars. You are a people without Asanid to the Sunnah, embrace it and move on. Realize this and wake up from your daze. Repentance is still possible.
ولا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله العلي العظيم.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Differing in Furu' (minor branches) existed from the time of the companions and the Prophet ﷺ.
What you are critiquing is the schools of the companions, the 4 Imams did not invent their own religion.
May Allah bless Shaykhuna al-Walid Ibn al-Salah.
A long time ago, people would just not reply.
But now, they have a new solution.
When they see the Shaykh's arguments being used, 1. Call him a donkey 2. Say "why should we respond to you when we can respond to the Shaykh"
Please respond to him. I am begging you.
Do not call him a donkey and run with your tail between your legs.
If you want the Shaykh's Whatsapp phone number tell me, I will give it to you. Reach out to him on Facebook, telegram. Make a YouTube video addressing him. Anything!
Go to his Twitter page, tweet at him, respond to him. @DrWaleed1975
It has reached a level where their عرف is to ignore everything he says.
Should tell you enough about it
The term Wahhabi was historically used and claimed by the Wahhabis themselves.
There is no derogatory use of the name of Allah تعالى as it is a Nisba (attribution) to Muhammad Ibn Abd ul-Wahhab.
Ibn Baz says this is a famous label of the scholars of Tawhid attributed to Muhammad Ibn Abd ul-Wahhab
Maybe you should read what al-Sakhawi himself said in al-'Ilan on why the opinions of contemporaries that had conflicts are not accepted from either of them.
al-Imam al-Hafidh Shaykh ul-Islam Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani writes;
"He (Ibn Subki) was extensive in studying Hadith and wrote in Fiqh and Usul and Arabic until he became an expert when he was young, and he was a man of eloquence, knowledgeable in the affairs.-
And I'm sure you have realized by now that my thread is not made up of only 1 example,
Why is it the rest of it is brushed under the rug?
When I was making that post, I of course knew this was going to be the favorite Wahhabi talking point, they were going to ignore everything and zoom in onto this.
That is why I added the army of the Shurrah of Hadith that supported my claim;
The position of the Asha'ira on Ahad Hadith (synonymous to Khabar Wahid) is clear and known, and this slander can only come from someone ignorant of the very basics of our creed, ignorant of what our scholars wrote, and ignorant of Islamic history.
As shall be shown, إن شاء الله.
The Asha'ira said it very simply, Khabar al-Wahid does not grant certainty, it is not 1000% that the Prophet ﷺ said it.
Thus, the one who rejects it is not a Kafir for disbelieving in something our Prophet ﷺ said, only a Fasiq.
Meaning, Aqa'id do not get based on Ahad Hadith.