Reading @LucyGoBag’s wonderful book #WhenTheDustSettles. It’s so good because Lucy connects narrative and analysis to show how broad policy lessons can emerge not through stats and data (I thought Lucy’s discussion of her dyspraxia was relevant here)…perspectivemag.co.uk/the-interview-… 1/8
but from very individual experiences, which she narrates through personal stories which will have resonances with most of her readers (I’m not with my copy now but it is full of underlinings, YESes and exclamation marks). 2/8
There so much to learn from this book, but two things came out for me reading it *now*: I’m not thinking about Covid here, but about momkeypox 3/8
Lucy opens with a discussion of the Hillsborough disaster, which was one of her earliest experiences of disaster growing up in Liverpool. She shows how an early narrative - that Liverpool fans, not police, were to blame - continued to shape understandings of the disaster 4/8
long after the ‘dust had settled’. A major theme is how decisions taken at ground zero can effect these longer term narratives, which link disasters to groups (Liverpool fans, gay men), not institutions & structures. I think @UKHSA would do well to learn this lesson with MPX 5/8
The 2nd lesson, for me, was people (like Liverpool fans) are the real experts in disaster. They kept the flame of truth burning when experts hung on to dangerous narratives. Anyone who has studied history of the AIDS crisis in the US or UK context can see relevance here 5/8
One of the things I’ve noticed when engaging with public health ‘experts’ on Twitter is a narrow credentialism — ‘If you are an expert in Covid, don’t talk about monkeypox’ or, to me, ‘What does an historian know about STI transmission’. 6/8
Lucy’s argument is that those impacted by a policy are often experts in disaster in a way that distasterologists, authorities, or other experts are not: and to make good policy, those effected by it need to be brought in. This was a lesson learnt by the CDC and UK government 7/8
after the AIDS crisis, but — as with many of the disasters Lucy chronicles — too late to prevent the delay having negative impacts - stigma and lack of engagement by those affected. 8/8
The *only* job of the Opposition is to scrutinise the laws that Government makes. Lockdown went against all prior pandemic plans, whether they were made by Tories after 2010 or Labour after 1997.
It is understandable that people blame Boris for hypocrisy, but the hypocrisy 1/6
was the result of rules that were wrong. They were wrong because they went against all pandemic planning. And they were wrong because the planners warned of the terrible effects of lockdown, which were all foreseeable (and foreseen).
Despite the fact that the impacts of lockdown were both knowable and predicted, opposition politicians did not bother to scrutinise the rules. Indeed, exxept for some Tory backbenchers, MPs and peers overwhelmingly supported lockdowns.
I’m not trying to trip @DrWillN up: trying to figure out several things (for clarity, thread is 6 tweets long). Would appreciate constructive replies to this from experts. Pts 1-3 relate to this episode; 4-5 have much broader applicability
1) why anyone would think telling single gay men not to have sex is a good idea in 2022
2) why everyone seems to be resorting to ad hominem arguments (I am evil; he is good) rather then addressing his argument and the style of articulation
3) why intelligent experts who I have a huge deal of respect for would think this language is appropriate?
4) why nobody seems to understand the problem of implying that this is a gay disease
It is horrific that @ScotGov have presented facemasks, which were introduced by governments as a means of encouraging compliance, not as a means of pandemic control -- have lied, to 1/7
themselves and and to the public -- that cloth masks are a means to "protect the vulnerable." There is zero evidence of this. It was a lie invented by @trishgreenhalgh and colleagues, with no evidential basis, which they have now retracted.
Prior to 2020, UK's pandemic plans (endorsed by @theSNP@scotgov at the time) was explicit about this: "Although there is a perception that the wearing of facemasks by the public in the community & household setting may be beneficial, there is in fact very little evidence /cont
Most Scottish nationalists want a one-party state led by Nicola Sturgeon, in which @theSNP are not subject to either the accountability of the @ScotParl nor the media. This was true before the pandemic
Over the last few years, many liberal democratic states — supported by the middle-class intelligentsia who have begun to vocally question the principles of democracy — have used emergency legislation in order to sidestep democratic accountability or created two-tier societies
based on medical status. In Scotland, We were told this would be temporary. @theSNP’s Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill shows this is a lie. Pts 1 & 2 would give ministers sweeting powers to declare a state of emergency which would allow it to shut down
Yes, Frances disabled children do exist, and they are often more impacted than the mitigations you have been calling for. Can you please stop spreading disinformation which has led to suffering and abuse of disabled children? 🧵 1/13
My experience: I attended a state school with mobility issues and a visual impairment which limited my ability to move around the school independently and take in information without assistance. At school I worked as a judge on NASEN special needs book awards
and I subsequently did disability advocacy at university and in the community which gave me a good early indication if diversity of disability.
My experience taught me two things: visual impairment more of a problem than my mobility because it limited my ability to communicate.
NYE and public health. Every year on Hogmanay, a fireworks display is held at Edinburgh‘s Carlton Hill, a UNESCO World Heritage Site & home to Playfair’s National Monument. The site overlooks the Scottish Government HQ at St. Andrew’s House, where ministers have their offices 1/5
In pre-pandemic times, Hogmenay fireworks were put on by @Edinburgh_CC. The event was staffed by numerous stewards to ensure public safety. However, because @NicolaSturgeon decided that nobody should be partying this year, no official fireworks were provided, and there were
on my count, 4 police officers sent to police the site. Yet, because it is a public site, hundreds of people gathered to see in Hogmanay 2022. And people lit their own fireworks. At sone point a fire appliance was called out (I assume as a preventative measure sent when police …