#RegenesisFact 7: A perennial rice variety developed by @NatureAsMeasure and Yunnan University is now on sale, fulfilling a dream scientists have pursued for a century. It has been harvested 6 times without resowing, with the same yields as annual rice. 🧵
Almost all the grain we eat comes from annual plants, that live and die within one year. Large areas dominated by annual plants are rare in nature. They tend to colonise ground in the wake of catastrophe: fire, flood, landslide or volcanic eruption that exposes bare rock or soil.
In growing annuals, we must keep the land in the catastrophic state they prefer. Every year, we must clear the soil of competing plants, puncture or turn it, and plaster it with the nutrients required to raise a crop from seed to maturity in a few months.
If we can produce our grain from perennials, we'd need to clear and break the land less often. They're also likely to be more resilient to climate chaos, as they have better-established roots and tougher structures. They could help form the basis of an entirely new agriculture.
.@NatureAsMeasure and its partners have been assessing thousands of perennial species that could replace the annual grains we grow, then selectively breeding the most promising species to raise their yields and improve their food and farming qualities.
Perennial rice is the first to reach full yield and be widely grown. Farmers in Yunnan are desperate for the seed, as the perennial crop means less soil erosion and less labour, in a region with a major erosion crisis and a major labour crisis. But many more are in the pipeline.
Perennial wheat, sorghum and other cereals, beans, sunflowers and other crops are all in development, and some are not far from being ready for commercialisation. The move towards perennials is one aspect of a Greener Revolution.
ii. Huang G et al., 2018. Performance, economics and potential impact of perennial rice PR23 relative to annual rice cultivars at multiple locations in Yunnan Province of China. Sustainability (Switzerland), volume 10, issue 4. doi.org/10.3390/su1004…
iii. Yanming Zhang et al., 2011. Potential of Perennial Crop on Environmental Sustainability of Agriculture. Procedia Environmental Sciences,volume 10, part B, pp. 1141-1147. doi.org/10.1016/j.proe…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#RegenesisFact 8: Tomas Linder, associate professor of agricultural sciences, has compared the land area needed to grow protein through precision fermentation to the most efficient agricultural method, US soybean farming. The results are astonishing: 🧵
In a typical year, soybeans occupy 36.5m ha of the US, an area greater than Italy. The land required to produce the same amount of protein by growing bacteria is 21,000 ha: the size of the city of Cleveland, Ohio. In other words, you’d need 1,700 times less land to grow it.
The land-use ratio is even greater when you compare it to animal products, as you can see from this chart.
Chicken needs roughly 5,000x as much land as microbial protein
Pork 8,000x
Beef 126,000x
Lamb 142,000x
1. I see that Polyface-style farming – chickens following cattle around the fields – is now taking off in the UK. And people are saying, “isn’t it wonderful – the chickens don’t need to be fed.” Let’s think about this for a moment. 🧵
2. It seems unlikely to me that a significant amount of chicken meat can be raised without supplementary feeding. I’d be surprised if there isn’t some quiet grain scattering going on. But, for the sake of argument, let’s assume the chickens are fending for themselves.
3. Chickens, like pheasants, are omnivorous birds that are non-native in the UK. They eat anything small enough that crosses their path. I’ve seen them tear frogs apart. They’ll eat baby snakes, insects of all kinds, seeds, fungi, the lot.
It’s publication day! In researching Regenesis, I found hope where hope seemed absent. I stumbled across astonishing stories and unimagined possibilities. I pieced together what I see as a plausible future for humanity and the wonderful life with which we share this planet. 🧵
Some of my proposals will at first seem outlandish, but please remember that the themes in Feral went from “this is ridiculous!” to accepted wisdom in just 9 years.
There is always more to the world than we imagine. More horror, but also more hope. More cruelty, but more possibility. Systems we are scarcely aware of, that behave in astonishing ways. Systems that can be changed. We can change course in less time than you might think.
When Feral was published, it was widely denounced as mad and dangerous. But I've never seen an idea that was so unfamiliar and so vilified so rapidly gain acceptance. Yesterday, the garden designed for the charity we founded, @RewildingB, won Best in Show at Chelsea.
This is the latest sign to suggest that rewilding in the UK has passed a tipping point. In other words, it has exceeded what researchers identify as the crucial social threshold: 25% public acceptance. Once it passes this point, an idea is normalised and treated as common sense.
I felt pretty lonely in 2013, beating the drum for rewilding. I wasn't completely alone of course: others had been trying. But the most common response was "WTAF are you talking about?". It shows how quickly things can change, even in hostile circumstances. This gives me hope.
#RegenesisFact 6: When neonicotinoid pesticides were first used on the farmland surrounding Lake Shinji in Japan, from one year to the next the weight of animal plankton in the lake fell by 83%. The fishing community’s catch then fell by more than 90%.🧵
These pesticides would be better described as biocides, as they can be devastating to entire ecosystems. Unless this trend is stopped, far worse is to come: the global use of pesticides is expected to *triple* across the first 50 years of this century.
Already, one study suggests, mostly as a result of the shift to neonicotinoids, farmland in the US has become 48 times more toxic to bees across 25 years.
#RegenesisFact 5: When healthy soil is air-dried, the relative humidity inside the tiny clumps made by its microbes and small animals remains at 98%. In other words, these clumps are more or less impervious to desiccation: a property that at first sight looks like magic. 🧵
It’s not magic, but nor is it accidental. The vast internal surface area that makes it possible is a feature of biological construction. The little clumps (called aggregates by soil scientists) are not just made within the soil. They are the soil. Without them, it would collapse.
Just as corals and other species are reef-builders, bacteria, fungi and small animals are soil-builders. In making homes for themselves, they build the ecosystem on which almost all terrestrial life depends.