1) A very interesting statement by the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (MP), which unfortunately I only saw today. The key point of the statement, in my view is where the synod says that it has been discussing its future. Could we be on the verge of a distancing from Moscow?
2) "Another issue that has worried many lately concerns the future of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. The Holy Synod states that today this issue is the subject of church discussion. In some dioceses there are meetings of the clergy, who express their position.
3) The information comes to the Primate. The Holy Synod welcomes the possibility of a thorough & comprehensive discussion of issues of church life, as the manifestation of the conciliar nature of the Church. But this process must take place without disturbing the church order.
4) In the near future, a meeting will be convened with the participation of bishops, priests, monks and laity to discuss the problems of church life that have arisen as a result of the war and which concern us all.
5) At the same time, we emphasize that we must do everything possible so that the discussion on this or that issue does not take us out of the canonical field and does not lead to new divisions in the Church."
6) So it does look like the Church is finally beginning to see that its relationship with Moscow is, in this light, untenable. But what are the alternatives?
The only realistic option would seem to be to merge with the Orthodox Church of Ukraine based in Kiev, but...
7) not only would this create a huge number of problems - what to do with two metropolitans? what to do with overlapping dioceses and bishops? - but there is also the fact that in this same statement the Church lashes out at the UOC-KP, even blaming it for the invasion
8) After criticising, quite rightly IMO, attempts to criminilise its activities in Ukraine, the synod says "We note with sadness that all these facts are the result of erroneous religious policy during the presidency of P.O. Poroshenko and the destructive ideology of the
9) so-called Orthodox Church of Ukraine. We are convinced that such activities of the previous government and the PCU became one of the reasons for the military invasion of Ukraine."
So not exactly building bridges there... Though maybe shoring up trumps for eventual negotiation?
10) The rest of the statement includes many condemnations of the war, and calls for unity in the face of the Russian threat. Not exactly towing the line of Moscow. We shall see what the future holds!
1) Just finished posting seven pages of the latest three public statements by the Met. of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (autocephalous).
This is especially interesting in light of my recent analysis of statements by the synod of the UOC-MP.
2) Fascinating how both churches simultaneously make gestures for peace and reconciliation, but cannot resist clubbing each other over the head.
In his address, on Tuesday, to the Church council, Epiphanius says the OCU should open up dialogue, with no preconditions, with the
3) UOC-MP, in order to achieve unity, asking his MP brothers to open their eyes to the evil that is the ROC at the moment (more on that in a bit), but at the same time applauds the same legal measures to suppress the influence of the MP in Ukraine that Met. Onophry deplored.
1) Since the beginning of the war I cannot recall Major Arch. Sviatoslav, of the UGCC, ever criticising Patriarch Kirill directly, but he did so today.
Yesterday Kirill made a speech to teachers, and told them that they should give their students examples of heroic Christians.
2) "the teaching of the Fundamentals of Orthodox culture can in no case be divorced from our life, so you should always fill it with wonderful examples. Of course, from the lives of saints, but also from the lives of our wonderful contemporaries,
3) from the lives of heroes who gave their lives on the battlefields. After all, even today there are so many heroes, so many who sacrifice their lives, their health, defending their homeland.
1) Coisas que não se vêem todos os dias!
O Conselho das Igrejas Ucranianas, uma organização que representa as religiões seguidas por 95% da população, protestou oficialmente contra a pintura de um mural gigante, em Kiev, de Nossa Senhora com um lança-rockets Javelin.
2) A imagem, conhecida como Sta. Javelin, tem aparecido aqui e ali nas redes sociais e refere-se à arma que é usada para neutralizar carros de combate (tanques) russos.
3) Uma exibição pública destas, com patrocínio estatal, parece desadequada, sobretudo quando do outro lado nos queixamos da utilização abusiva da religião para incentivar a guerra, pelo que se compreende totalmente o protesto dos líderes religiosos.
1) Patriarch Kirill gave an important speech 3 days ago, in which he criticised the West and the Patriarchate of Constantinople, and lashed out against the cancellation of Russian culture.
2) Kirill began by recalling how Peter I “cut through” the window between Russia and the West, but added that now “this window remains open only for mutually respectful dialogue, and not ideological dictate and bossy shouts from outside”.
3) This is a constant refrain from Russian figures, and others in Eastern Europe. Even Pope Francis has spoken about the dangers of “ideological colonisation”, with the west wanting to impose its now godless values on the rest of the world.
1) This interview with Met. Hilarion, of the Department for External Relations of the Russian Orthodox Church, is from 13 May, but I only read it today.
Some interesting details to look at. actualidadereligiosa.blogspot.com/2022/02/war-in…
2) Perhaps the most important is his insistance that: "in the West the statements of the Patriarch are viewed through the prism of propaganda carried out in the media, and Western politicians cannot adequately assess these statements"
3) This might make sense, were the Patriarch's statements not made public on his website. All the statements I have collected on my blog are not read through the prism of Wester propaganda, they are lifted directly from the homepage of the ROC. And some of them are pretty grim!
1) Some interesting words by ++Shevchuk over this last week, but perhaps the most interesting was the document from the UGCC Synod on the war, curiously dated 13 May.
In it the bishops hint that the reason God allowed Ukraine to become independent, and the UGCC to be restored
2) was in anticipation of this fight against Russia: "the revived Kievan Rus rebelled & stopped the evil will of the aggressor, albeit at a high price. The price we continue to pay today on the altar for the liberation of our and other nations to stop the insatiable dragon"
3) Ukrainians are thus "becoming a nation of martyrs-heroes who give their lives, protecting not only our relatives but all European nations and their freedom"