TX authorities now acknowledging a devastating failure of judgment.
“Based on the information we have, there were children in that classroom at risk and it was an active-shooter situation, and not a barricaded subject."
"The incident commander inside believed they needed more equipment and more officers to do a tactical breach." Meanwhile, there were 19 officers available to act.
TX DPS Director McCraw: "It was the wrong decision, very wrong. There's no excuse for that. … When there's an active shooter, the rules change. There is no longer a barricaded subject. You don't have time."
McCraw: “I don't have anything to say to the parents other than what had happened. … We're not here to defend what happened. We're here to report the facts.”
Reporter: Uvalde parents now know that not everything possible was done to save their children. Are parents owed an apology?
McCraw: “If I thought it would help, I'd apologize.”
McCraw: “But let me say this…when you go back to the timeline, there was a barrage—hundreds of rounds were pumped in four minutes into those classrooms. Any firing afterward was sporadic and it was at the door.”
Hence the assessment—wrong in hindsight—of a barricaded subject.
McCraw, director of TX DPS since 2009, came close to tears, his voice cracking. He came under criticism after death of Sandra Bland in 2015. The storm of controversy this time is at least as intense.
McGraw says the incident commander was the Uvalde Independent School District chief of police. That's Pete Arredondo.
It seems rare for blame in judgment to be placed on a single commander so soon after the incident. Massive investigation still underway.
FBI rep: 200 personnel onsite over four days. Agents working across the country. Victim specialists on site. “If the facts bear out that there's a federal nexus then the FBI will conduct an appropriate investigation at that time.”
McCraw, asked about Biden visit on Sunday: “Welcome here. Welcome to Texas. This community has been hit hard and I think it’s noble that the president is going to be here to recognize the pain and suffering that this community is going through. That’s what leadership is.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On Tuesday afternoon, my @TexasTribune colleagues were covering the primary runoff. A few were recovering from COVID. Several young parents were excited about the end of the school year. Everyone looked forward to the holiday weekend. Then came news of Uvalde.
My colleagues scrambled. In just three days our nonprofit newsroom—a few dozen journalists who mostly cover politics and policy—has published 30 articles on the deadliest school shooting in Texas history.
We’ve dived heavily into policy, explaining why a state that’s been the site 8 mass shootings in 13 years has repeatedly loosened gun laws. texastribune.org/2022/05/24/tex…
Q: Will Abbott call a special session to roll back recently enacted gun liberalization laws?
A. “Let's be clear about one thing. None of the laws I signed this past session had any intersection with this crime at all. … No law that I signed allowed him to get a gun.”
Abbott says laws passed after 2018 Santa Fe high school shooting may need to be revisited, acknowledging questions on whether those new rules were adequate, or implemented.
Re health: “There will be committees formed, there will be meetings held, there will be proposals that will be derived, many of which will lead to laws that will be passed in the State of Texas. … The status quo is unacceptable.”
The @TexasTribune is deeply proud to be a founding partner with @VotebeatUS, a new nonpartisan, nonprofit newsroom dedicated to fact-based reporting on voting and elections.
Voting has always been a core part of our coverage; our reporter @alexazura is a top authority on voting rights, voting access and redistricting in Texas. Check out her latest blockbuster story here: texastribune.org/2022/05/20/gal…
This new partnership will allow us to supplement that coverage. @VotebeatUS will hire, and @TexasTribune will help direct, edit and support, a full-time reporter covering election administration in Texas. Stay tuned for that announcement!
It’s been nearly a decade since @BarackObama felt compelled to release his long-form birth certificate. April 27, 2011. In hindsight, it was a pivotal moment. 1/
I’ll never forget how absurd the moment felt: Why dignify the racist birther lie? WH said at the time Obama “believed the distraction over his birth certificate wasn’t good for the country,.” I felt uneasy. 2/
In the decade since, the level of crazy has turned up, notch by notch. We’re like frogs in slowly boiling water. The birther lie was Trump’s original Big Lie. 3/
As a 1997 intern at @washingtonpost I saw firsthand the hurt, doubt and division sowed by Ruth Shalit’s 1995 @newrepublic article asserting that diversity efforts were roiling the newsroom. nytimes.com/2020/11/01/bus…
She recklessly argued that The Post was a cauldron of Black-White tension. Her distortions and—it turns out—outright falsehoods harmed both JOC and managers trying to make things better.
To their credit, WaPo Publisher Don Graham and Executive Editor @lendownie criticized Shalit’s shoddy, one-sided reporting and defended the work + integrity of WaPo journalists. But the damage was real and lasting.