2. We will start by examining the tweet @KTLA sent out (the very same day even copagandist national news reported knew the UPD was lying) invoking the Ontario PD. Note:
✔️ “ended with their death” = passive langauge
✔️ “police said” = are the police the only source?
3. The lede: "At least one Ontario Police Department officer opened fire on a person, killing them after a pursuit that ended in Pomona."
OK, at least there's active language, but notice "killing them" comes after abstract "opened fire on a person."
But how do we know this?🚩
4. "The pursuit began at about 7:37 p.m., when police tried to execute a traffic stop near Mission Boulevard and Magnolia Avenue, according to Cpl. Lee of the OPD."
🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
UH OH. Our first source is the police. The party who did the killing (possibly a homicide)
🚩🚩🚩🚩
5. Who is Cpl. Lee? Does he have a first name?
Since someone was killed (who???), why are we hearing first from the agency who killed them?
Is Cpl. Lee going to be the only source in this story?
🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
6. "The vehicle failed to yield, and the pursuit traveled through Montclair and into Pomona, where the driver collided with a civilian vehicle, Lee said.
The driver then left their car and at least one officer opened fire."
Again, why is the only source Lee, the cop?
🚩🚩🚩
7. "Lee did not detail what led up to the shooting, how many officers fired their weapons, how many bullets were fired or how many times the person was struck."
🛑 STOP 🛑
The only source so far "did not detail what led up to the shooting"—then WHY is this a NEWS story?!
8. "The subject of the pursuit was pronounced dead, though it remains unclear if they were pronounced dead at the scene or if they were taken to a hospital." Note:
✔️ "was pronounced dead" = passive
✔️ "it remains unclear" 🛑 STOP ! Your job is to FIND OUT what's unclear!
9. The kicker: "No officers were hurt, and it remains unclear if the driver of the civilian vehicle was injured in the crash." Wait, what? That's the "news story"?
✔️ How/why do we know "no officers were hurt"?
✔️ "it remains unclear if the driver" was injured? How? Why?
10. The entire "story" is just 165 words, and took two bylines?
What @SamBaderNews@CameronKiszla and @KTLA have done is not just copaganda, it's journalistic malfeasance. I'll lay out what they did wrong, then explain what's going on systemically.
✔️ to talk to anyone other than the killer's employer
✔️ to find out who died
✔️ to identify the cop who shot
12. They failed to find:
✔️ a single witness from near Mission Boulevard and Magnolia Avenue,
✔️ a single witness who saw the deceased when they crashed into a civilian vehicle
✔️ the person who owned the civilian vehicle that was crashed into (were they a witness?)
13. They failed to find:
✔️ "what led up to the shooting, how many officers fired their weapons, how many bullets were fired or how many times the person was struck"
✔️ who pronounced the victim dead or "if they were pronounced dead at the scene or—taken to a hospital."
14. So, to recap, @ktla assigned 2 journos, @SamBaderNews@CameronKiszla, to write abt a very serious matter—a person was killed— who only used 165 words, interviewed one source (the agency of the killer), didn't report where or when the death happened & interviewed no witnesses.
15. This isn't "news," so what's going on?
In the Chomsky/Herman Propaganda Model, this is filter Three: A reliance on official sources.
16. I expressed my rage at @brianstelter this week, who acted like media have a passive role in what "facts" circulate, rather than interrogating how journalists turn to police as the sole "reliable sources" and CREATE a this problem
17. As usual, @PatBlanchfield said it better than me. Police are not "reliable sources." NO ONE should be a sole source for ANY story! If a student turned in a single source story, I'd return it for revisions. Our job is find things out, not be parrots!!!
18. What happened in Uvalde is horrific. But as @The_Law_Boy wrote last night, the police lies are quite ordinary. They only collapsed under national scrutiny & the weight of 19 dead children and 2 dead teachers (God rest their souls).
19. Let's return to the person killed this week by the Ontario PD.
✔️ Who were they?
✔️ How and when did they die?
✔️ Who was the officer who shot them dead?
✔️ Was there anyone in the crashed car? Who were there? Are they OK?
✔️ WHY did they die? Was it "justified?"
20. When the state executes someone (without charges, trial, jury or appeal), these are important questions! @KTLA@CameronKiszla@SamBaderNews didn't only fail to answer them — they used news media as COVER to keep such questions from ever BEING asked in service of the police.
21. Indeed, @juliegoldberg. From charge to execution, it takes an average of 15 years. The suspect would not have been sentenced to death for running from cops. But @KTLA has engaged in copaganda justifying on sight execution, w/o doing any REPORTING!
22. To wrap up for now: Got to hear @equalityAlec speak yesterday & 2 things stayed w me: Our jobs as professional curious ppl (researchers, scientists, journos) is to ask important questions. Not to be on the sidelines. What's the point it not?!
24. Here, there is a craft failure to ask basic questions (who, what, when, where, why) of anyone other than a single source. But that's reflected in a failure to think abt the bigger questions.
This happens in local "crime" reporting ALL THE TIME.
That's all (for now)
25. Related: The market will bear two journalists writing a 165 word “news story” that is a rewrite of a police press release, but it will not bear (even in a non-profit, public media setting) a methodical team or just 6 or 7 audio journos who get a man off death row via SCOTUS
26. I do not publish anything until it’s ready to be ethically be published. If someone else “scoops” me with an irresponsible story, fine. Many rags ran “Tiger Mandingo” stories for months before I wrote on Michael Johnson 8 yrs ago. Ppl remember my stories, not the rags.
27. There are ethical ways to cover breaking news, and I’ve done it rarely. But generally there is no point on repeating press releases. If it’s news, it has to take as long as needed. Let hacks regurgitate. If you’re a journalist dealing w serious life and death matters,
28. Give them all the attention a life and death Matter deserves.
29. Apologies — meant to put Alt text of the screenshot of the entire story in tweet above
30. Remember @Ajzionts, it is *your* name on every story you file, and readers will believe it reflects your values.
31. Another way to think about it: if there’s nothing more you can report than what’s in a press release, then it’s not “news.” There is no story. Ppl can get the info from the press release. finance.yahoo.com/news/oreo-cook…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is a very privileged housing problem in one way, not in another, but should be discussed: For those of us who live in fancy vertical bldgs, something very unethical but legal has happened. Many were lured into lease with good offers on a faulty premise.
Many of these bldgs did not lower rents in the pandemic. Instead, they offered free months of rent on leases— 1 or 2 months free rent on 1 year leases, 3,4 or even 5 months free rent on 2 year leases.
But the base rent did NOT go down. The premise was that these bldgs didn’t want to suppress actual rents bc when things bounced back they didn’t want to have lower base rent.
Renters entered into these leases thinking we are not going to get free months at lease renewal, BUT—
They are going to try to put at least half us out on the street at lease renewal this year bc doubling the rent for half the tenants means twice the income for half the maintenance cost & labor. And the law & politicians will do nothing about. In a pandemic (yes, it’s ongoing).
There is no limit to rent increases in most of the US. In NY there are about a million units that are rent stabilized or controlled & the mayor is calling for the max increase allowed this year (9 percent) but landlords can literally raise any other apts as much as they want.
There are a million rent stabilized homes in NY but 20 million ppl live in the state. One year at my job I was thrilled to get a 20 percent raise (from 35K to 42K). But at lease renewal my landlord raised the rent 40 percent. I had to move & effectively got a pay cut.
✔️Or—gasp—just healthy to go to bed when I’m tired?
Thank you. I've lost a lot of people in my family -- and close to their birthdays, death anniversaries my body will start too shut down before I am consciously aware of the date. Of course, I could be grieving all the pain of this wk. Thx for the reminder.
I guess this is what neoliberalism does, but I thought it must be my personal failing (depression) and it didn't even occur to me that it coulld be grief at everything.
If you are this deeply in student debt even as a doctor or lawyer, you are not your aspirational class status someday. This IS your class status. You are not your possible future class status. Many ppl will never see earnings reflective of their loans, too.
Still, even if you will someday make more money, being deeply in debt pura you behind people who are not. Not everyone goes into debt for med or law school; their generational wealth pays for it. Or they’re give a down payments to start building more wealth in school.
1999. I had just moved to Williamsburg. Passed a building and heard sounded like a child being murdered—inhuman screams which sounded like they were coming at the hands of an only slightly less loud adult beating them. Ran home and called 911.
Dispatch asked if it was my child being beat and when I said no they said there was nothing to be done, couldn’t tell where it was. I gave them the address, a small three unit Apt building. If they send someone they would have heard the screams.
Dispatch said something to the effect of people discipline their kids all the time, it’s no one else’s business. I said the child was screaming for help and wailing inhumanly. They said there was nothing to do & hung up.
I’ve only called 911 in 23 years since, for an ambulance.
I appreciate everything @MarshallProj does, but I fundamentally disagree w its finding here that Black/PoC cop union bosses would embrace reforms—indeed, my research funds the opposite: Black head cops uphold the policing status quo MORE than whites. themarshallproject.org/2020/06/10/a-m…