Everyone else is napping at this time, so I’m finally getting around to my first read through of #TheSANERRule. I haven’t quite started yet, but am hoping that what I find can make that label stick. federalregister.gov/documents/2022…
federalregister.gov/d/2022-08268/p… says: “would also revise the hospital and critical access hospital (CAH) conditions of participation (CoPs) for infection prevention and control and antibiotic stewardship programs”, this is why I might call it #TheSANERRule, and where I will focus.
#TheSANERRule has 638 pages in print form govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR…, and covers a number of additional topics. I’m expecting that somewhere around 200-250 pages matter to me.
But this “m. Condition of Participation (CoP) Requirements for Hospitals and CAHs To Report Data Elements To Address Any Future Pandemics and Epidemics as Determined by the Secretary” is why I’m calling it #TheSANERRulefederalregister.gov/d/2022-08268/p…
Words I love to read: “we propose to require hospitals and CAHs to report specific data elements to the CDC's National Health Safety Network (NHSN), or other CDC-supported surveillance systems, as determined by the Secretary”. I strongly support having NHSN doing this work.
I’d hate to see NHSN expertise lost in this effort. If it were to go elsewhere, perhaps a restructuring based on core NHSN expertise would work IMHO. It was already a loss when it transitioned away from NHSN in the first COVID-19 summer #THeSANERRule
“this section would apply to local, state, & national PHEs as declared by the Secretary. Additionally, we are proposing that the hospital (or CAH) provide the information specified on a daily basis, unless the Secretary specifies a lesser frequency [based on] … ongoing risks.”
Skipping way ahead in #TheSANERRule to 11. ICRs for Condition of Participation (CoP) Requirements for Hospitals & CAHs To Report Data Elements To Address Any Future Pandemics & Epidemics as Determined by the Secretary
Important details finally: “we do not expect that these categories of data elements would require hospitals and CAHs to report any information beyond that which they have already been reporting” … but continue to report until 2024 or the secretary says done #TheSANERRule
“For purposes of burden estimates, we do not differentiate among hospitals and CAHs as they all would complete the same data collection.” Is so wrong headed. Most hospitals have an IT dept to provide support. Some CAH’s have a guy that comes in once a week. manual burden >>>>$$
Youngest is listening to @GameGrumps while I review #TheSANERRule. The number of times that game commentary seems applicable to this rule is hilarious.
“.. likely overestimates the costs associated with reporting because it assumes that all hospitals and CAHs will report manually. Efforts are underway to automate hospital & CAH reporting that have the potential to significantly decrease reporting burden and improve reliability”
A reference to what they are actually talking about in that last tweet might be nice. CMS failed to provide one, but obviously, The SANER Project and new work in Helios in HL7 we are engaged in are two of these efforts. #TheSANERRule
#theSANERRule “In addition, we are proposing to establish reporting requirements for future PHEs related to epidemics and pandemics… Acute Respiratory Illness”
I am reminded of a story told at PHIN by a keynote speaker some 10-15 yrs ago…
… in which she said basically, we spend all this money on systems XXXX flu, and it was useless for YYYY flu (XXXX,YYYY =some form of bird flu and swine flu in I don’t recall what order).
Please don’t forget that not all pandemics are respiratory
#TheSANERRule Page 28643 and last link already has me drafting first comment on “require hospitals & CAHs to report specific data elements to the CDC's National Health Safety Network (NHSN), or other CDC-supported surveillance systems, as determined by the Secretary”
It reads: “We strongly support building reporting efforts upon the core expertise of NHSN who nas been handling hospital, CAH and LTC infectious disease reporting for decades.”
It’s not stealing if I give permission. Feel free to copy that text into your own comments on #TheSANERRule
Family has reawoken, back to vacation… I’ll be back to this later
Resuming my read through of #TheSANERRule over this holiday/vacation weekend:
“The proposed requirements of this section would apply to local, state, and national PHEs as declared by the Secretary.”
I note this covers national, state and local …
What about territorial and tribal Public Health Entities? Are they required to report for #TheSANERRule? There may be jurisdictional issues here, as this is mandated as a condition of participation, and so may not be applicable in these regions.
“categories of data elements that this report would include are …:
* Suspected & confirmed infections of the relevant infectious disease pathogen among patients and staff;
* total deaths attributed to the relevant infectious disease pathogen among patients & staff;
…
* personal protective equipment & other relevant supplies in the facility;
* capacity and supplies in the facility relevant to the immediate & long term treatment of the relevant infectious disease pathogen, such as ventilator & dialysis/continuous renal replacement therapy capacity and supplies;
[this can be parameterized by disease]
* total hospital bed and intensive care unit bed census, capacity, & capability;
* staffing shortages;
* vaccine administration status of patients and staff for conditions monitored under this section and where a specific vaccine is applicable;
* relevant therapeutic inventories and/or usage;
* isolation capacity, including airborne isolation capacity;
* & key co-morbidities and/or exposure risk factors of patients being treated for the pathogen or disease of interest …
“We are also proposing to require that, unless the Secretary specifies an alternative format by which a hospital (or a CAH) must report each applicable infection (confirmed and suspected) and the applicable vaccination data in …
… a format that provides person-level information, to include medical record identifier, race, ethnicity, age, sex, residential county and zip code, and relevant comorbidities for affected patients,
…
unless the Secretary specifies an alternative format by which the hospital (or CAH) would be required report these data elements.
We are also proposing in this provision to limit any person-level, directly or potentially individually identifiable, information for affected patients and staff to items outlined in this section or otherwise specified by the Secretary. …
We note that the provided information obtained in this surveillance system that would permit identification of any individual or institution is collected with a guarantee that it will be held in strict confidence, will be used only for the purposes stated,
… #TheSANERRule
and will not otherwise be disclosed or released without the consent of the individual, or the institution in accordance with Section 304, 306, and 308(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 242b, 242k, and 242m(d)).
…. a hospital (or a CAH) would provide the information specified on a daily basis, unless the Secretary specifies a lesser frequency, to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's … NHSN or other CDC-supported surveillance systems as determined by the Secretary.”
FYI:
The @HL7 FHIR Situationanal Awareness for Novel Epidemic Response (SANER) IG has the capacity to support this reporting and we have demonstrated this at several connectathons over the past two years (Since May 2020).
That guide takes advantage of the same standards promoted by @ONC_HealthIT for use of #FHIR APIs for patient data access , but also includes provisions to support data access for other information not routinely stored in an EHR such as devices and inventory.
federalregister.gov/d/2022-08268/p…
“For purposes of this burden collection, we acknowledge the unknown and the ongoing burdens that may exist even if CMS is not collecting information outside of a declared PHE.
… #TheSANERRule
…
We recognize that considerations such as building and maintaining the infrastructure to support readiness are necessary to ensure compliance with this requirement.”
Therefore, we are soliciting comment on the burden associated with these proposed requirements given the intended flexibility provided in reducing or limiting the scope and frequency of reporting based on the state of the PHE and ongoing circumstances.
…
… asking for comment on the potential burden associated with the proposed reporting requirements as they might relate to any differences in the public health response to one specific pathogen or infectious disease versus another that would be directly related to the declared PHE
We are also interested in public comments addressing burden estimates (and the potential differences in those estimates) for variations in the required reporting response for a local PHE versus a regional PHE versus a national PHE
There are seperate conditions of participation for hospitals and CAH as There are seperate programs these COP apply to, but they read largely the same. #TheSANERRule
Thus ends my first read through, some thoughs on #TheSANERRule follow:
1. The IPPS rule is an annual thing 2. Conditions of participation are part of IPPS 3. Thus a rule like this will never get separated 4. But I really wish it would for better focus on just this topic
I’m generally both OK and somewhat disappointed in the content, but it matches expectations at this stage.
1. No direct mention of SANER, that can be both good and bad 2. Good in that “the secretary can declare”, bad is it seems to indicate a lack of awareness.
There are at least two Federal Requests for proposals that I expect might even be delayed by feedback on this rule, including grants to states and modernization
#TheSANERRule provides you with an opportunity to provide input to that thinking. Much of what you might say may have NO DIRECT impact on this regulation. In fact there are regulations about that.
I pretty much acknowledge this rule can likely NOT mandate use of SANER, …
It cannot b/c it isn’t mentioned as a possibility, only briefly is it even vaguely referenced. But other provisions cite “the secretary can declare” and that is where your input about SANER in #TheSANERRule will help inform “The Secretary”.
I’m done on this first read through of #TheSANERRule, and returning to my vacation.
P1: "Alissa Knight has spent the last year focusing on hacking
Fast Healthcare Interoperability and Resources (FHIR) APIs,... #HackingFHIR
Yup, I read her last report on a related topic, and can attest there's a big investment in time, and her credentials are solid as a white hat hacker #HackingFHIR
OK, now it's time to review @AMugge's rule, more formally titled: Medicaid Program; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Reducing Provider and Patient Burden by Improving Prior Authorization Processes, and Promoting Patients’ Electronic Access to Health Information for...
Medicaid Managed Care Plans, State Medicaid Agencies, CHIP Agencies and CHIP Managed Care Entities, and Issuers of Qualified Health Plans on the Federally-facilitated Exchanges; Health Information Technology Standards and Implementation Specifications
A title so long, it fills two tweets.
Simplified it's the second full length novel in the Payers on FHIR series from CMS, subtitled the Beginning of the End of EDI
#NewHIPAA Proposed Privacy Rule Thread starting. These are my notes, there'll be a blog post summarizing these later. 1/??? And I'm not even going to try to count these or tag all with #NewHIPAA, I'll just keep them in this thread.
Basically this is needed because healthcare providers say "I can't do that b/c HIPAA, and patients say "yes you can", and lawyers say "but ...", and trees, we need to save some trees.
A lot of the input on this rule came from a request for information in 2018.
The big points are: Give me my damn data, and let me take notes, and do it faster, and you can get it in the form and format that you ask for, w/o having to bring umpteen forms of id, clarifying when you can be charged, changing the fee structure, making fees more transparent ...
If it looks to you like the exponent on infection growth rate is increasing, you are probably right. I just looked at the 5-day LOGEST values (estimate the exponential growth based on last 5 days activity), and the rate has risen 4 out of the last 5 days. Testing just started...
So, this isn't scary to me YET. What it means is not that the real exponential growth rate of infection is increasing, but rather that the rate of our knowledge of exponential rate is increasing. But more testing is still needed to get the numbers to settle down ...
There's gonna be lots of numbers for the epidemiologists and hyper-mathy folks to study RE impact of testing volumes (see ) on estimates of real growth rate when this is over. I don't recall signing up for that clinical trial though.
O for a Muse of FHIR, that would transcend
The brightest HL7 of invention,
A country for a stage, CEOs to act
And patients to behold the swelling scene! #Cures#VHC
Then should the humble Posnack, like himself,
Assume the port of Mars; and at his heels,
Leash'd in like hounds, should famine, sword and fire
Crouch for employment. #Cures
But pardon, and gentles all,
The flat unraised spirits that have dared
On this unworthy parchment to bring forth
So great an object: can this cockpit hold #Cures
Starting at page 221 with the regulation itself (see how I do this...I skip to the regs first, I’ll go back through the preface material later) #PatientAccesscms.gov/Center/Special…
In the following, mom is simply how I think about the phrase "Medicare Enrollee". It could be dad, uncle Fred, my buddy Glen et cetera. #PatientAccess is about the patient.
So, mom's MA organization has to provide APIs that allow her to use an app (after mom approves it) to access standardized claim data, adjudications, appeals, provider payments (remittances) and co-payments (cost-sharing) within one business day of claim processing. #PatientAccess