Jon Parsons Profile picture
May 30 9 tweets 2 min read
The failed response to the COVID-19 pandemic is best understood as an ethical failure, not a scientific or technical one.

It is rooted in the abdication of responsibility on the part of those in authority, but of everyday people as well. It is a failure of common decency.
On the one hand, leaders gave up on the duty of care they owe the public. Some leaders capitulated to economic interests. Some to political pressure. Some to simple weakness and expediency.

In the worst cases, they actively undermined basic notions of moral responsibility.
But on the other hand, it is an ethical failure that implicates everyday people, too.

Everyone is responsible for the predictable consequences of their actions. It is no excuse that the government said it was okay or to be ignorant of the harms when it is easy to be informed.
In fact, the strategy for this "learning to live with it" phase of the pandemic is precisely to allow people to believe they are not responsible for the predictable consequences of their actions, encapsulated in the ideas of "personal risk management."
If someone believes they are responsible only for their own risk and their own well-being, then infecting other people or participating in a culture of mass infection is not wrong. It is always the other person's responsibility for their own well-being.
This is, of course, totally absurd, amounting to a denial that actions impact others. The abdication of responsibility also enables behaviours that are not just self-centred but actively hostile to the rights and existence of people with disabilities and those who are vulnerable.
Calls for reasonable management of the pandemic are met with the phrase "You want us to stay in lockdown forever," as if there is only absolute isolation or unchecked mass infection.

Part of the aversion to any precautions is precisely because it highlights the ethical failure.
The call for common decency is likewise simply saying that we owe one another the most basic respect and have a duty not to cause obvious harm.

It is not calling for utopia or saying everything was perfect before. Just that we should at least try to be good to each other.
If we truly are now at a place where encouragement from those in authority means people give up on moral responsibility, and where basic common decency is abandoned, then there is good reason to be concerned about where this may lead.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jon Parsons

Jon Parsons Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jwpnfld

May 28
The failed pandemic response is not about bad people doing bad things. If there was a nefarious group acting to harm our communities it would be easier to do something about it.

The pandemic failure is banal, perpetrated mostly by people who see themselves as essentially good.
That is not to say no one is responsible. Some people have done great damage, and everyone is responsible for the predictable consequences of their actions.

But many of those who have done the most harm truly believe they are acting with the best interests of the public in mind.
It is also not about some flaw of human nature and things do not have to be this way. People are perfectly capable of acting for collective well-being and rising to the challenges posed by the pandemic.

In many countries, people are doing so to good effect.
Read 7 tweets
May 26
The best predictor of future behaviour is past behaviour, and so the failure to adequately respond to the COVID-19 pandemic foreshadows an inability to deal with other significant issues.
It could be other infectious diseases, worsening consequences of ecological collapse and climate change, issues of social and political injustice, and any ongoing COVID-related concerns.

Realistically, none of this can be addressed or even correctly understood at present.
It is shocking to see precisely the same failures repeated and to see that nothing has been learned.

But when nothing changes, nothing changes.

And before anything can change, there needs to be an acknowledgement that what has happened is a failure.
Read 6 tweets
May 24
The absurdity of the "learning to live with it" phase of the pandemic is not just the denial of the reality of the situation, but that denial hinges on the pretense that everyone is "happy-busy-good."
They must be happy about being back to in-person work, school, and public life.

They must be busy with events, holidays, and socializing of all kinds.

They must be good with how things are going and with the removal of public health measures.
It is not enough to have ongoing mass infection, but people must joyfully embrace this "new normal."

Happy-busy-good is signalled through the things people say (i.e. "you have to live your life") and through the way people act (i.e. without "restrictions").
Read 8 tweets
May 21
The insistence that the pandemic is over, even in the face of overwhelming evidence it is not, is born of a desire shared by just about everyone.

Everyone just wants this to end.

There is an enormous incentive for those with the most influence to say it is over.
And there is an enormous incentive for the public to believe what they are being told.

The magical thinking that punctuates this "learning to live with it" phase of the pandemic is mutually reinforcing between those with influence and the public.
They tell the public what it wants to hear and the public hears what it wants, and any conflicting information is excluded, misinterpreted, or subsumed and incorporated into the "new normal."

This operation is at times quite clumsy and obvious but it still works remarkably well.
Read 7 tweets
May 20
The subtitle of my recent book on COVID-19 and ethics calls out a "failure of common decency."

In this "learning to live with it" stage of the pandemic, perhaps more than at any point in the past two years, decency just doesn't seem so common, and that's a huge concern.

🧵
The notion of common decency is from a quotation in Albert Camus' novel The Plague:

"There's no question of heroism in all this. It's a matter of common decency. That's an idea which may make some people smile, but the only means of fighting a plague is common decency."
Common decency, as Camus understands it, requires that people accept the unfairness and absurdity of the situation in which they find themselves, and then choose to act in a way that takes into account the needs of those around them.
Read 9 tweets
May 16
Public attitudes in the current phase of the pandemic have taken on elements of magical thinking, often encouraged by those with the most influence.

Four components of this magical thinking are 1) changing the meaning of words, 2) scapegoating, 3) ritual, and 4) prophecy.
1) Changing the meaning of words, which could be called spells or magic words, involves mobilizing language to mystify, but also making acceptable what should be unacceptable. Here are a few examples:

"Learning to live with it" means accepting high levels of death and suffering.
"Mild" means it doesn't put you in hospital.

"Back to normal" (a phrase laden with ableism anyways) means things will never be the same again.

"Endemic" means ongoing mass infection.

"You have to live your life" means ignoring the predictable consequence of your actions.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(