One of my totally awesome students wrote today "everyone complains about #Koreaboos but the Korean gov't is actively making them."
And oh my gosh, so much truth.
The Korean government does not see the cringe in the #Koreaboo. They see an enthusiastic consumer. They see
someone who reflects back to them a vision of Korea that they love. It strokes their ego. They do not correct the errors and misunderstandings of the Koreaboo, they *do not care.* They will feed the Koreaboo with exotified elements, or over the top praise of an idol.
The Koreaboo is a manifestation of a fantasy relationship with Korean pop culture (or some parts of it), but to Korean bureaucrats the foreign interest in Korea is already a poorly understood fantasy, to them there is no difference between the Koreaboo and my awesome student.
For clarity, my student is actively studying in Korea, learning the language, knowledgeable (and growing more so) and has a critical understanding of Korea as a place that is often wonderful but has some serious problems. This makes them basically the exact opposite of the K-boo
Koreaboos are great consumers, and the government officials don't believe foreigners can ever really understand Korea or Korean things.
I can go for a lunch with a bureaucrat tomorrow and they might still show their surprise that I like kimchi and can use chopsticks.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The way "do research" has been dumbed down in the present day is... making me wish I had a different word for what I do. Anti-vaxxers and the like with their "do your research" even though their "research" is only finding random information online that agrees with them,
regardless of the accuracy of said information.
Exhibit A: an opinion piece in a newspaper.
Exhibit B: a peer-reviewed academic publication.
Exhibit C: information you collected by going to the source/ creating new studies.
Which one of these is less reliable?
The problem is the anti-vaxxers probably aren't seeing the academic research, and they don't have the training to create a new study-- so they just read newspaper opinion pieces until they find something that agrees with them.
Why do (international) fans (or critics) expect #kpop to somehow espouse strong social positions?
1). Koreans get their pointed social criticism in music from independent Korean music. Being independent means you actually can express your ideas as you choose, right?
2). Idol pop performers are often young and working incredibly long hours-- they may not have time to stay up to date on issues and make an informed statement. That issue may mean the world to you, but they're under so much pressure with their job, and their job is performing.
Men assume that all women (who must be heterosexual, of course) lust after attractive men, and would, given a chance, leap upon a celebrity. There are enough women who have done that that anecdotal evidence exists. However, in my conversations with women friends we almost
always agree that we enjoy looking at other people for many reasons other than sexual desire.
But because of male gaze media, even many women seem to assume that visuals, body parts, etc. are what get them "going" so to speak (rather than only part of it).
So, the narrative
that fandom must be about sexual desire is really hard to escape. Yet when I read fanfic (presumably written by women), it very clearly shows me that it's the *situations* that people are turned on by. And you can literally trade names and make that situation about anyone, right?
On the subject of getting a PhD to study about Korea:
The single thing you need more than anything is excellent Korean language ability. You shouldn't even enter a program with intermediate Korean (if your native language is very far from Korean, like English).
The number of ways that excellent Korean will help you to do great research simply cannot be counted.
BUT some universities will accept you, because they don't know how long it might take you to have Korean that's good enough to do research. Even if you master the language
during your degree program, it'll probably be the fourth or fifth year of your PhD before you can ACTUALLY read academic Korean. So, how do you do research for the four or five years before that? From secondary sources in other languages. Is that good research? No.
If you're considering studying about Korea, or doing research about Korea for your PhD, here's a hard truth: if you're not a Korean national (and it's a good idea even if you are) you need Korea specialists on your dissertation committee. FULL STOP. Why?
1) If you want a job dealing with Korea or funding from Korea you need the rec letters of people who are *known to know about Korea*
They literally are confirming your legitimacy and worth as someone who would know.
2) Korea specialists can catch you on your misunderstandings, suggest good readings, make connections and introductions.
Storytime:
I once saw a woman's dissertation abstract. It was full of the hippest theoretical ideas and addressed a topic very close to my own work.