Share this page!

Kelley K Profile picture
@KelleyKga
May 31, 2022 • 4 tweets • 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
1/ This is not a "great figure" by @jeremyfaust. It's actually incredibly dishonest. As usual, Dr. Faust compares apples to oranges in order to exaggerate the impact of Covid on children. 🧵
2/ For flu deaths, Faust uses deaths from CDC WONDER with the *underlying* cause of death listed as influenza on the death certificate (CDC says this "may drastically underrepresent" the flu burden). He doesn't use flu burden estimates or influenza & pneumonia combined. Image
3/ For Covid deaths, Faust uses deaths from CDC's NCHS where Covid is listed *anywhere* on the death certificate. Per CDC, for ~25% of these pediatric deaths, Covid is NOT the *underlying* cause of death. For January 2022, the difference is 103 from WONDER vs 156 from NCHS! Image
4/ In addition to Faust's complete dishonesty of comparing multiple CoD data for Covid with underlying CoD data for flu, we also test much, much more COVID than we did for flu, which further exacerbates the differences in metrics for these two diseases.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Kelley K

Kelley K Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KelleyKga

Kelley K Profile picture
Mar 23
Three years ago when I started tracking Covid data in Georgia, I never imagined I'd end up co-authoring a paper on basic mathematical errors the CDC made during the pandemic. Most of the errors exaggerate the risk to children. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
This paper identifies 25 errors the CDC made - all factual numerical errors. The CDC's use of the Data Tracker demographics page to consistently overstate pediatric deaths was the source of several errors. kelleyk.substack.com/p/the-cdcs-fla…
Other errors related to their reliance on the flawed pre-print and their related claim that Covid was a top 5 cause of death for children of all ages. They cited that statistic even after the pre-print authors admitted the errors. kelleyk.substack.com/p/fact-check-c…
Read 7 tweets
Kelley K Profile picture
Mar 15
In the wake of debate about the Cochrane review and a new New York Times op-ed from Zeynep Tufecki claiming "the science is clear that masks work," many are just learning about her outsized influence on mask recommendations early in the pandemic. kelleyk.substack.com/p/where-us-mas…
A major part of Zeynep's advocacy was not just that cloth masks were an effective mitigation strategy, but she also vehemently disputed any discussion of potential mask harms. kelleyk.substack.com/p/where-us-mas…
Once community masking for *everyone* was deemed effective, necessary (due to asymptomatic spread), and harmless, it's not surprising that the CDC implemented a misguided and nuance-free recommendation - which quickly became a requirement in many places. kelleyk.substack.com/p/where-us-mas…
Read 4 tweets
Kelley K Profile picture
Feb 26
I know that @CDCgov lies a lot about pediatric Covid risks (esp in ACIP meetings), but when they state so clearly "6 months - 17 years," I expect them to actually subtract the 305 deaths *under 6 months* from total pediatric deaths. This slide should say 1184, not 1489.
CDC should also label the slide as "Covid-associated Deaths" -- deaths where Covid is anywhere on the death certificate. UCoD by age comes from CDC WONDER, so the time period and <1 age brackets are a bit different, but ~30% of pediatric Covid deaths are NOT underlying CoD.
Yet another example of why I argue CDC acts more as a sales/marketing agency than a health agency. kelleyk.substack.com/p/cdc-is-a-vac…
Read 4 tweets
Kelley K Profile picture
Feb 9
Walensky repeated the lie that Covid has lead to 2000 pediatric deaths in the US?!? That's from their flawed Data Tracker demographics page, and is NOT accurate. @CDCDirector needs to be held accountable for providing this false information. @DanCrenshawTX kelleyk.substack.com/p/the-cdcs-fla…
@CDCDirector @DanCrenshawTX Also, at the ACIP meeting when they discussed the Vaccines for Children program, the CDC explicitly stated that the vote on the VFC program was completely separate and distinct from the schedule. So she's admitting they lied to the ACIP advisors and to the American public then?
@CDCDirector @DanCrenshawTX Here were comments from @nirav_mainecdc (who is now being promoted to 2nd in command at CDC) from the Oct. ACIP meeting about the vote to add Covid vaccines to the schedule:
Read 4 tweets
Kelley K Profile picture
Jan 30
Three more months to “begin the process of a smooth operational wind-down of the flexibilities enabled by the COVID-19 emergency declarations.” 🙄
And I'm wondering if this will include lifting the ban on unvaccinated travelers to the US?!?
Here's some good information about what each of the various declarations do. It sounds like the two I highlighted are what Biden will be ending. The link has additional tables with a lot more specifics about which declarations affect which things. kff.org/coronavirus-co…
The White House made it clear that the two emergencies that they're continuing until May "do not impose mask mandates or vaccine mandates." Don't get your hopes up that the government's remaining vax and mask requirements are in any way tied to these emergency declarations.
Read 4 tweets
Kelley K Profile picture
Jan 29
1/ Many issues with this study that have been addressed by a lot of others, but I looked into their claim that their finding of 36% is in line with estimates of 10-80% from other studies. The meta-analysis they referenced that found 80% had Long Covid is seriously flawed.
2/ The cited study included a meta-analysis of 7 studies identifying prevalence of Long Covid. The highest one used **the wrong number** from that study. 94% had symptoms when they tested positive. 35% had symptoms 2-3 weeks later. Very different. Image
3/ Another study had a control group, but the meta-analysis used the % with symptoms in the infected group (ignoring the 35% with symptoms in the control group)! Three other studies included hospitalized patients from early 2020. Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Send Email!

:(