A thread about using fonts/typography in presentations. Decisions about text matter. Just as you can speak the same word in many ways, the way you write text can affect communication, emotion, and attitude. 🧵1/19
Some basics: Fonts are commonly characterized as serif fonts or sans serif fonts. Serifs are little projections that hang off the ends of letters. Sans serif fonts do not have these projections. 🧵2/19
Serif fonts are great for printed words on a page. In fact, the purpose of the serifs are to guide the eye in reading text from left to right on a page. This is why most journals/books/magazines use serif fonts. 🧵3/19
Sans serif fonts are easier to see and perceive from a distance. All billboards and theater marquees feature sans serif fonts. Sans serif fonts are best for slides and posters because text is easier to read from across a room. 🧵4/19
In figures, sans serif fonts are always the best choice because they are easiest to perceive. Arial or Helvetica are always excellent and accepted by any printed journal. 🧵5/19
Some sans serif fonts convey a bit more personality than others. They can make a slide or poster presentation seem less standard or routine without being too playful or unprofessional. 🧵6/19
Some sans serif fonts are extremely playful. However, they may be conspicuously playful in a way that is distracting and draws attention from the content. They also might look like a presenter is trying too hard to be fun. 🧵7/19
Non-proportional (also called “monospaced”) fonts are fonts in which each character has the same width. These fonts are terrific for writing letters in a sequence, such as sequences of DNA, amino acids, or computer code. 🧵8/19
Specialty fonts convey a lot of personality and tone. They are ideal during moments when you may want to conspicuously capture an audience’s attention, but can easily be distracting. I use them sparingly. 🧵9/19
Obviously, the ultimate goal of a font is to be legible. In written presentations, a standard serif font is usually best. For slide or poster presentations, casing, contrast, bolding, italicization, and color can all affect legibility. 🧵10/19
A common misconception is that the size of a font is the distance from the bottom to top of a character. In reality, a font size is the height of an imaginary metal block, as it would exist in an old-fashioned typewriter! 🧵11/19
Computers specify the size of a font in “points.” A point is defined as 1/12 of a pica, which itself is about 1/6 of an inch. 🧵12/19
Because the point size is the height of an imaginary block in a typewriter and not the height of the character itself, the only way to know exactly how large a font will appear in a particular point size is to try it! 🧵13/19
It is fun to be deliberate about typesetting, the way characters are arranged together in a word, in a sentence, or on a page. 🧵14/19
Communication is also enhanced when words are grouped together in a pleasing manner on a slide or poster. 🧵15/19
I have only seen one exception in which isolated words look good and unless you are the director of Star Wars, I wouldn’t advise it. 🧵16/19
Bullets are a great way to group items into a list or sequence. Like any other visual element, their use should incorporate some simple design principles to increase clarity and communication. 🧵17/19
Use numbers when you want to show an ordered sequence and a bullet when the sequence is arbitrary. 🧵18/19
I’ll have more to say about fonts and typography in the coming days when talking about slides and posters! Fonts and typography enhance communication and attitude in all forms of presentations. 🧵19/19
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Alright, another common misconception I encounter is the gene vs allele/variant mixup. Most often I see it phrased something like "She has the gene for breast cancer."
In this example, I think we all understand what the person means: she has a genetic variant that makes her more predisposed to breast cancer. For a lot of purposes, that's the only information we really need.
But in reality, we all have two copies or alleles of the BRCA2 gene, one from each parent. But some of us have versions of that gene that make us more prone to developing breast cancer.
Alright, time to talk some DNA misconceptions and how we can try and break them down!
First up, myths about dominant and recessive traits.
This one hurts, because I thought a lot of these were true for a while!
Often when learning about genetics, we learn that things like tongue-rolling, attached earlobes, and PTC tasting are pure dominant/recessive traits. They're simple, easy traits to demonstrate in a classroom.
But unfortunately, many of them aren't really true dominant/recessive traits! There's a great website called "Myths of Human Genetics" by John H. McDonald at the University of Delaware that breaks down where many of these myths came from: udel.edu/~mcdonald/myth…
Good morning, all! Today, we're gonna talk about the importance of SciComm in Genetics. Why genetics specifically?
Because that's what my PhD is in, so I'm biased towards it being the coolest science 😂.
BUT ALSO because I strongly believe we're all increasingly asked to make choices that involve genetics in our everyday lives, and I want to equip everyone with the vocabulary to feel comfortable making these choices, from getting a DNA test at the doctor to understanding GMOs.
And while I've believed this for a long time, it was thrown into an incredible spotlight over the past few years, as things like PCR and RNA became household words. Imagine my delight as I saw RNA trending, and then the sadness as I found threads full of misinformation.