#RegenesisFact 12. Perhaps the most common of all the proposed solutions for shrinking the impact of the food system is reducing food waste. Of course we should reduce waste. But both the potential for doing so and the impact of doing so have been greatly exaggerated. 🧵
I’ve heard people claim that because roughly one-third of the world’s food is wasted, salvaging it could feed all those who go hungry today, while saving vast tracts of farmland and much of the fertiliser, pesticide and water farmers use.
But the majority is not recoverable.
In the UK, for example, of the two million tonnes a year that’s wasted, a standard industry estimate is that only 250,000 tonnes (one eighth) can be rescued. Organisations like @FareShareUK, using clever interventions, have been able to stretch that a little.
They’ve helped shame the supermarkets into handing over their excess, and helped farmers and manufacturers to reduce food losses. But they’ve probably now extracted most of the accessible surplus from the food chain.
Much of the rest is “post-consumer”: ie it’s the uneaten/half-eaten leftovers that go into your compost bin. Any takers? Thought not.
It might be possible to persuade some people not to buy more than they’re likely to eat, but, given the price of food, people already seek to minimise their costs. Planning is never perfect, and some waste is inevitiable.
The environmental impact of reducing food loss is small by comparison to the impact of changing our diets. One paper compared the reduction of greenhouse gases through halving food waste to the reduction achieved by switching to a plant-based diet. The difference? 5% vs 80%.
So, given that people’s readiness to listen to exhortation is limited, perhaps we should focus on the kind that could make the biggest difference.
Some global calculations mistakenly assume that any reduction in environmental impacts caused by shrinking food waste is a net saving. It’s not.
In poorer nations, where much food is lost through slow and unreliable transport and spoiling by high temperatures, pests or bruising, the solutions - such as more and better roads, more refrigeration and more packaging - can reverse some or all of the environmental savings.
None of this is to say we should stop trying to reduce food waste. But we should be aware of the limitations, and recognise that in countries like the UK there is not much further it can go. So why do so many people put this issue at the top of their list? My guess:
Because it’s safe. Reducing food waste, like reducing litter, is uncontroversial. There’s no need for major political or economic change, no need to confront power, little chance of getting into a row with angry conservatives and legacy industries.
Especially when the focus is on consumer waste, it individuates the structural problems with the foodchain, shifting the focus from corporate and industrial malfeasance to individual fecklessness. Power loves that.
But the real, massive problems with the foodchain, that both threaten its own resilience and threaten the living planet, are systemic and institutional. They cannot be addressed without confronting power and pushing for systemic change.
Sources: i. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO). Technical Platform on the Measurement and Reduction of Food Loss and Waste. fao.org/platform-food-…
ii. Melanie Saltzman, Christopher Livesay and Mark Bittman, 2019. Is France’s Groundbreaking Food-Waste Law Working? PBS Newshour, Pulitzer Centre, 1 September 2019. pulitzercenter.org/stories/france…
iii. Yanne Goossens, Alina Wegner and Thomas Schmidt, 2019. Sustainability Assessment of Food Waste Prevention Measures: Review of Existing Evaluation Practices. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, Volume 3. doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.…
iv. Jenny Gustavsson et al., 2011. Global Food Losses and Food Waste- Extent, Causes and Prevention. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO). fao.org/3/i2697e/i2697…
v. Brian Lipinski et al., 2017. SDG Target 12.3 on Food Loss and Waste: 2017 Progress Report. World Resources Institute - Champions 12.3. champions123.org/sites/default/…
vi. Waste & Resources Action Programme, 2008. The food we waste. wrap.s3.amazonaws.com/the-food-we-wa…
vii. Walter Willett et al., 2019. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet, volume 393, issue 10170, pp. 447-492. doi.org/10.1016/S0140-…
viii. UN Food and Agriculture Organisation, 2015. Food wastage footprint & Climate Change.
fao.org/3/bb144e/bb144…
ix. Purabi R Ghosh, et al., 2015. An Overview of Food Loss and Waste: why does it Matter? COSMOS, volume 11, issue 1, pp. 89-103. doi.org/10.1142/S02196…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with George Monbiot

George Monbiot Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GeorgeMonbiot

May 30
#RegenesisFact 11: Across 7 years, the UK government spent £6 billion in foreign aid supporting farming overseas. NOT ONE PENNY of this money was spent on projects whose main focus was the development or promotion of agroecology. 🧵
In fact, no money was spent on organic farming of any kind: it was all poured into the kind of agriculture the private sector already promotes, consolidating the rise of the Global Standard Farm. This, the researchers found, was typical of the aid disbursements by rich nations.
While organic farming and agroecology are not always a formula for good practice, and can have major problems of their own, unless we can shift farming towards a low-impact, high-yield model (of the kind I explore in Regenesis), it's hard to see how we'll sustain our food supply.
Read 5 tweets
May 29
#RegenesisFact 10: A survey published in The Lancet discovered that over 90% of policymakers believe “personal motivation” is “a strong or very strong influence on the rise of obesity.” They have yet to explain how 2/3rds of us rapidly and simultaneously lost our willpower. 🧵
In reality, obesity is strongly associated with:
- Poverty
- Stress, anxiety and depression associated with low social status
- Time poverty
- Junk food formulation, designed to bypass our natural mechanisms of appetite control
- Junk food marketing
- Food deserts
Obesity is often associated with malnutrition. Bad food tends to be obesogenic. According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation, a good diet costs five times as much as one that’s merely adequate in terms of calories.
Read 17 tweets
May 29
I’ve emerged from another horrible pile-on, this time on Facebook. This one was *really* weird. It was started by Craig Sams, co-founder of Whole Earth Foods and Green & Blacks and former chair of the Soil Association.🧵
In Regenesis, I gave a price for agricultural lime (across 80km) of £50 a tonne. This, Craig said, was “Wrong. Plain wrong. The cheapest lime you can buy is £600 delivered.” He suggested it was “a manipulation of figures” to make a point: I was lying. “Shame on you Mr. Monbiot”🧵
Then it got really nasty. It was reposted by a prominent farmer, and in both threads I was accused of being a liar, a fraud, a charlatan and much worse (I won’t repeat what some people said). Many of those making these claims were farmers or growers.
Read 7 tweets
May 27
#RegenesisFact 8: Tomas Linder, associate professor of agricultural sciences, has compared the land area needed to grow protein through precision fermentation to the most efficient agricultural method, US soybean farming. The results are astonishing: 🧵
In a typical year, soybeans occupy 36.5m ha of the US, an area greater than Italy. The land required to produce the same amount of protein by growing bacteria is 21,000 ha: the size of the city of Cleveland, Ohio. In other words, you’d need 1,700 times less land to grow it.
The land-use ratio is even greater when you compare it to animal products, as you can see from this chart.

Chicken needs roughly 5,000x as much land as microbial protein
Pork 8,000x
Beef 126,000x
Lamb 142,000x
Read 22 tweets
May 27
1. I see that Polyface-style farming – chickens following cattle around the fields – is now taking off in the UK. And people are saying, “isn’t it wonderful – the chickens don’t need to be fed.” Let’s think about this for a moment. 🧵
2. It seems unlikely to me that a significant amount of chicken meat can be raised without supplementary feeding. I’d be surprised if there isn’t some quiet grain scattering going on. But, for the sake of argument, let’s assume the chickens are fending for themselves.
3. Chickens, like pheasants, are omnivorous birds that are non-native in the UK. They eat anything small enough that crosses their path. I’ve seen them tear frogs apart. They’ll eat baby snakes, insects of all kinds, seeds, fungi, the lot.
Read 5 tweets
May 26
#RegenesisFact 7: A perennial rice variety developed by @NatureAsMeasure and Yunnan University is now on sale, fulfilling a dream scientists have pursued for a century. It has been harvested 6 times without resowing, with the same yields as annual rice. 🧵
Almost all the grain we eat comes from annual plants, that live and die within one year. Large areas dominated by annual plants are rare in nature. They tend to colonise ground in the wake of catastrophe: fire, flood, landslide or volcanic eruption that exposes bare rock or soil.
In growing annuals, we must keep the land in the catastrophic state they prefer. Every year, we must clear the soil of competing plants, puncture or turn it, and plaster it with the nutrients required to raise a crop from seed to maturity in a few months.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(