casually scrolling through this months phmpt.org pfizer pfraud pfiles, and what dost mine eyes behold! famotidine and ivermectine are covid-19 therapeutics in a clinical trial setting, whatever the fuck that means. is the #gtmp not given in a trial setting? fuckers Image
phmpt.org/wp-content/upl…
19/334 good to know it wasn't just bnt162b2 being tested in the clinical trials. somehow that fact rarely finds mention. and yeah, stabilising the cleavage site is gonna enhance "immunogenicity" aka damage. Image
was there evidence of "non-vaccine-related" disease enhancement or fertility/fetal dev/postnatal dev, though?
some interesting details on the april 2020 german human dose finding study ImageImage
Phase 1 of the pivotal study seems to have screened for antibodies, and should have excluded! Phase 2/3 includes unhealthy/at-risk demographics, but no mention of antibodies. But we know they tested for nucleocapsid antibodies and enrolled seropositive subjects. ??? @Jikkyleaks Image
"we'll follow up on covid incidence but won't use that data" i wonder why Image
also peculiar: phase 1 subject booster data wasn't used and "will be reported at a later time". with how nonchalantly pfizer has brushed off EMA post-market questions and requirements, i wont be holding my breath. what did they see that prompted them to withhold this data? Image
"the selected vaccine candidate" why not just say which one it was? weird. very unclear/imprecise wording, were there 164 "efficacy events" in the 360 cohort? and some more unreported data. had no idea there's already a variant modRNA injection, must have failed hard. Image
C4591017 sounds like an exceptionally interesting read. Image
why different names depending on whether it's in an EUA or a CMA authorisation country? Image
the best-made plans..and a whole lot of disinformation! the vaccine doesn't contain an antigen, doesn't stay in the muscle (radiocoded luciferase rats january 2020), measuring modRNA in plasma is very much feasible, and more restricted data. ImageImage
things that make you go hmmmm Image
36/334 efficacy calc populations for the US phase 1. so there was evidence of prior infection in a QUARTER of the population prior to 7days post-dose2? 176 infected in the ~21 days between doses in the non-placebo arm? Image
wow. 42k enrolled, 32k without evidence of prior infection 7d/dose2. what are the criteria for a case to be evaluable? reference to the central lab indicates this was exclusively PCR testing, not serological ab data. Image
fucking ridiculous! they only used nc-ab data from visit 1, and exclusively central-lab-PCRs for assessment of prior infection in consecutive visits, despite collecting nc-abs throughout? what?? Image
dont cry for me argentina...how is it supposed to make sense using only nucleocapsid ab data from one visit? ImageImage
how can they say this when we have the full nucleocapsid data? Image
hmmm, 83.6%+8.2%=91.6%. also interesting that there seem to have been infections in between days 7 and 14 post-dose 2 ImageImage
laughable. p53/334 has a very interesting table: covid cases during vaccination! ImageImage
p86/334 just wow. the 11 days after vaccination fuck you up! Image
those are some pretty bad results, no? how does that suggest vaccination enhances natural immunity? Image
p99/334 check out those confidence intervals^^ Image
that sounds like 12.5x more spikes than an infection to a layperson like me. also note the last sentence in the screenshot^^ Image
is that how long you're producing spikes after modRNA application? Image
literally forces your body to make more neutralizing antibodies than an infection for a much longer time. 43 day vax sera being compared to 14day convalescent sera. working as intended, i'd say. Image
can you say "immunosenescence"? the difference between 18-55 and 56+ cohort is staggering. better keep those immune cells naive as long as you can!! how can you read this and think the injection is a good idea? 3.6x more ABs than convalescent sera! Image
charming. they decide how bad it is, and whether it even has anything to do with the vaccine. and yet more data "coming later" Image
make it make sense: lots of people did not complete the study, yet only six people "discontinued" Image
40%-45% of recipients reported at least one AE - but no deaths! wonder if there were some "not related" fatalities, though Image
fantastic numbers Image
not related, thank god Image
would you look at that! the unblinded participants were only subject to half the followup. ImageImage
only 0.1% withdrawals mainly by the participant, yet only 72.4% of the unblinded population completed their dosing schedule? what? Image
the numbers just dont add up at all. and what do they mean by 1% of open-label participants came to the 1month/dose2 visit, but 29% to the 6month visit? how do more than 25% not complete dose4 yet only single digit withdrawals?? ImageImage
only half the study participants had 6 months of follow-up, and the reactogenicity subgroups all bled ~10% of participants between dose 1 and 2, except for the HIV+ subgroup, which gained participants..lol ImageImage
p284/334 just a little cancer Image
not related Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with a_concerned_amyloidosis💜🐭🇩🇪

a_concerned_amyloidosis💜🐭🇩🇪 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @a_nineties

Jul 24
#rkifiles ein inkohärenter strang mit entdeckungen aus dem leck. "nCoV hat eine zusätzliche multibasische furin-spaltstelle", zusatzmaterial 5.2.2020 🤔download hat für mich nur über diesen mirror geklappt: (h/t @DerCheapi ) dercheapi.de/files/rki/
Image
10.2.2020 zusatzmaterial, risikobewertung für DE. sehr interessant wie "anhaltende viruszirkulation" ausschlaggebender bestandteil der gefährdung gemacht wird und gleichzeitig der letzte kontaktmanagement-satz gestrichen wird. Image
13.2. ergebnisprotokoll - asymptomatische sollen nicht getestet werden? Image
Read 199 tweets
Jul 2
wanna see something funny? final CSR for sanofi-moderna booster+flu jab study was released on EMA CDP. 3 groups with 100 patients each, 1) mrna 1273 50 ug + sanofi, 2) sanofi only 3) moderna only. all 60+, 90%+ 2020-2021 flu jab rate, inclusion criterium 2x moderna. Image
link didnt fit in the previous post, this is study QHD00028. so! of the six medically attended cases of covid, there were three in group 1 and three in group 3 and none in group 2😬imagine how salty bancel must have been, just imagine! mega.nz/folder/rBgl0Jy…

Image
Image
this group dynamic remains remarkably constant throughout the safety reporting. i find the breakdown tables pretty interesting to look at given the split in group 1. also showcases neatly that pfizer-biontech are the only sponsors to have diarrhea as a solicited sytemic event

Image
Image
Image
Read 8 tweets
Jun 11
🚨FINAL MODERNA STUDY REPORT 🚨 uploaded on EMA CDP 30.5. 15k words with no end in sight into my pfizer CRF writeup, so im just gonna do a brief flyover of this 8500-page monstrosity. unlike AZ a few days ago, this is the pivotal phase 3 mega.nz/folder/nNAg3DZ…
Image
page 11: yeah so because incidence rates were similar in vaxed-months-ago and vaxed-just-now, there is duration of protection. but because BOTH groups got more covid later, gotta boost 😵‍💫 Image
page 12: and the reason we gotta boost is becaaaauuuuussseee boosties had more covid than un-boosties. what? Image
Read 7 tweets
Apr 2
the very first goddamn email: daszak says baric is working on nanoparticles, and baric is asked about sars glycoproteins he's making for a DARPA grant and they're trying to get them into bats

from march 2018
Image
gonna read these closer tomorrow Image
jesus christ, "batized" mice, as in mice frankensteined into having a bats immune system? Image
Read 6 tweets
Mar 31
ADSYMPT - covid signs and symptoms
ADAE - adverse events
Image
Image
these are the symptoms that can lead to a "covid illness visit" except for 7 days after each dose. Image
these are the scraped results from both files. some of the "signs and symptoms of disease" from ADSYMPT don't translate directly to ADAE MedDRA terminology, for example fever=pyrexia, sore throat=oropharyngeal pain. take a good long look at it and let me know if it makes sense. Image
Read 10 tweets
Mar 20
been looking at the latest pfizer puff piece. this is going to be a dump thread of links and files. both C4591031 and C4591007 are heavily represented on the EMA CDP portal. already did a thread on C4591031:
Image
firstly, c4591031 has results on the EU CTR. results have been updated three times by now 👀 this includes substudies A-E so it's REALLY really long. c4591007 only has a protocol posted clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/tri…

Image
Image
the US CTR entry for c4591007 lists spanish sites, yet the EU CTR only has finland and poland 🤔 Image
Read 61 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(