The Second Amendment was inspired by British plans to disarm every American.
A part of you probably already knew this, but didn’t have the details.
I’m about to chill you to the bones And give you every piece of evidence you need moving forward. So buckle up.
It began In 1768, “the freeholders” led by John Hancock and James Otis, met in Boston at Faneuil Hall and passed several resolutions. Including “that the Subjects being Protestants, may have Arms for their Defense.”
The royal governor rejected this proposal.
So this petition was circulated under the pseudonym “A.B.C.” (Who was more than likely Sam Adams)
Shortly after Sam Adams’ petition was circulated, per the Boston Evening Post, (Oct. 3, 1768) British troops took over Faneuil Hall.
And per The New York Journal, (Feb. 2, 1769) they ordered colonists turn in their guns.
Sam Adams would write about this time later that month saying, “it is said orders will soon be given to prevent the exportation of either navel or military stores, gun-powder, to any part of North-America.”
In another article he signed “E.A.”, Samual Adams went on to recall, “The right of having and using arms for self-preservation and defence.” Under the auxiliary subordinate rights of the English Bill of Rights
Shortly after, As you may recall in 1770 protesters “armed with sticks” we’re shot dead in the streets of Boston during the Boston Massacre.
It would be 4 years before the first physical attempt to disarm the Colonists would be tried and would fail, per the Massachusetts Spy, Sept. 8, 1774
Now this next part is the piece that really makes my skin crawl
In an affidavit, a man name Thomas Ditson testified that an Undercover British soldier pressured to him to buy a gun he had. When Ditson caved, a group of British soldiers appeared and he was tarred and feathered.
Per the Connecticut Courant, April 3, 1775, ammunition seizures followed.
This was followed shortly there after by the widely published American account of April 19, 1775, when a British officer shouted:
“Disperse you Rebels—Damn you, throw down your Arms and disperse.”
Then per the Connecticut current, a Gen. Gage decided to change the British tune. See, They just wanted to hold the guns for a little bit “for safe keeping” and then they promised to return them.
“And that, the arms aforesaid at a suitable time would be return’d to the owners.”
Bostonians proceeded to turn in 1778 muskets, 634 pistols, 973 bayonets and 38 blunderbusses.
Because some Bostonians have always been this stupid.
In June of 1775 General Gage declared martial law and offered to pardon to all who would lay down their arms—
except Samuel Adams and John Hancock.
Seriously How fukin badass were these men.
Per the (Connecticut Journal and New-Haven Post-Boy, June 21, 1775)
The Gazettes in Virginia and Maryland both reported more attempts to confiscate weapons through the summer of 1775.
Now, the Continental Congress adopted “The Declaration of Causes of Taking Up Arms”, July 6, 1775.
This was drafted by Thomas Jefferson and John Dickinson, and to be perfectly honest, we should probably know as much about it as we do the founding Documents. Wonder why we don’t.
In 1777, British General William Knox, under British Secretary of State, circulated a proposal entitled “What is it to be Done with America?” Along with the unlimited power to tax and an official Church, what else did he propose? You guessed it. YET AGAIN. Gun confiscation.
This time it was too late. The colonists were at war. The damage had been done.
Entrapment.
“safekeeping.”
Banning imports.
Direct seizure.
Tarring and feathering.
And finally shooting persons bearing whatever they say is “arms”.
As I watch Congress bloviate today over ways to disarm us, I’m reminded of all these ways the British tried to do the same thing 250 years ago. And how that congress fought to save us from the common enemy.
Now it seems many of them are the enemy.
So what do we do?
We learn from our past.
Sam Adams had always drawn the connection that those who wanted to disarm us, also fiercely wanted to stop us from petitioning our grievances.
I believe there’s more power in petitioning grievances than we realize. And this is why the founders enshrined it in the first amendment—
Before the second amendment.
So I don’t know but I think that’s a good place to start.
/end
Sourcing from the archives of Boston Evening Post, Boston Gazette, Massachusetts Spy, Massachusetts Gazette, Connecticut Courant, Essex Gazette, Connecticut Journal, Virginia Gazette, and The Independent Institute.
OMG WE DID IT GUYS.
THERE WILL BE A ZERO TOLERANCE FOR GROOMING AND TRANSING KIDS, WITH SEVERE CONSEQUENCES FOR DOCTORS, HOSPITALS, BIG PHARMA, AND SCHOOL OFFICIALS, AS WELL AS RETROACTIVE JUSTICE.
Originally, Trump had been advised that this was a parental rights issue, which is also true— kids are being secretly groomed & in some cases, removed from their homes. His zero tolerance position now demonstrates he’s been advised Munchausen by proxy is also largely at play here
This is an executive order— Congress needs to write a bill to codify it. Let’s hope we win both houses, and this is brought to the forefront.
Wrong. I’m not “misleading” anybody by saying we’re not a democracy. We’re not. We are a constitutional federal republic of 50 states. What’s misleading, and frankly disingenuous by design, is calling America “our democracy”. Because of this repetition, along with the failed federal education system, voters assume the electoral college is a bug, not a feature, and they want to abolish it.
When Benjamin Franklin came out of the constitutional convention on September 17, 1787, he was asked by Elizabeth Willing Powel, “Well, Doctor, what have we have, a republic or a monarchy?”. Franklin responded, “A republic, if you can keep it”. He did not say “we are a democracy”. That would imply majority rule, which the founding fathers had an aversion to, so no we don’t have that. Benjamin Franklin misled nobody, just as I mislead nobody.
Let’s look at the electoral vote versus the popular vote. It doesn’t matter how many people vote for a certain party. The popular vote is meaningless here— but it’s Democratic. “One person one vote”, right? What matters is which state they live in, and how many electors each state has. 50% of the country lives in 5% of it, If we had a direct democracy, the fate of our entire country would fall to a handful of coastal cities.
The goal of the media and the government incessantly repeating “our democracy”, is to propagandize low ordered thinkers, and eventually wind up as a democracy without a Republic— like in the UK— parts of which we already divorced.
How’s that one party state working out in the UK? Do we like mass surveillance, warrantless searches, no free speech and gun bans? Would we like every state’s justice system to be captured like theirs? Thank God the electoral college and the 10th amendment are preventing us from collapsing into the ills of
🌈democracy🦄.
However, we’re well on our way to being just like that again with the invasion of our country. Why do you think they are flying criminal aliens into blue state strongholds the swing states? The census is how they determine electors. The goal of circumventing the electoral college by jamming it full of people brought here for the bloated government, and entitlements, who do not share our values, is to wind up with a one-party state. This is what Benjamin Franklin meant by “We are Republic *if we can keep it*”. There are bad actors and a multibillion dollar human trafficking machine hell-bent on seeing that we don’t.
And just because your country votes, it does not mean you are a democracy. That is not a trump card. North Korea has mandatory voting and a 100% turnout rate. Would you call them a democracy?
The U.S. Constitution mentions:
Democracy: 0 times
Republican form of government: 1 time.
In a Constitutional federal republic, we vote for our representatives. In a democracy, they vote direct.
With this model, our Constitution holds the highest authority, not the everchanging popular opinion of the day.
Your followers missed the part about civility.
If Trump & Kamala have the same “masters” then why are people only trying to kiII him? why is she not facing 800yrs in prison & lawfare? why is her MSM coverage 95%+ & his 92%-? why didn’t he start any wars? Why do Warhawks hate him?
Let’s talk about his term: Why didn’t Trump force the vax on us during Covid? Why did he turn to the 10th amendment instead of executive orders during Covid? Why did he broker peace deals in the Middle East? Why did he make the Supreme Court originalist? Why did my taxes go down?
Why is he favoring crypto? Why is he bringing Tulsi on to advise foreign policy? Why’s she now on a watch list? He wants Vivek on to advise gutting alphabet agencies, RFK to neuter big pharma & big agriculture, & Elon to cut government. Is small government what the masters want?
The riders had 2 missions- alert Lexington & Concord and surrounding towns to tell them to put their surprise attack plan into action, and tell Sam Adams & John Hancock to flee.
Dr. Joseph Warren (Son of Liberty, revolutionary leader, & beloved town doctor, who would tragically die 2 months later at Bunker [Breeds] Hill,) sent Paul Revere, Samuel Prescott, Israel Bissell, & William Dawes.
Sybil Ludington’s involvement is a massive lie her clout-chasing nephew told decades later that I won’t ever dignify.
We know Sybil existed due to her husband’s pension, but all those involved kept meticulous diaries & records yet she is absent from every single one of them.
She kept her own diaries. Not a word about any involvement in the war effort whatsoever. But people wanted to believe this fantastic story about a young tomboy riding twice the length of Paul Revere and 3 times as fast, recruiting men, dodging burning villages, and getting honors from George Washington. They even built her a statue. But none of that ever happened. There is not a shred of evidence. All there is was the word of her nephew to a women’s group. He was probably looking to smash. Typical male feminist. Gross.
Women were part of the revolution— Deborah Sampson, Molly Pitcher, Abigail Adams— just not Sybil Ludington.
Banning X accounts, with no due process, violates sections 8, 9, 17, 27, & 36 under Title II of the Fundamental Rights and Guarantees of the individual and collective under Brazil’s Constitution.
Here is the clause Alexandre is trying to exploit without due process.
That’s quite a word salad to say you didn’t actually read the Brazilian constitution but are super duper mad that Elon and I both did.
Community noters, you know what to do.
On a day so sad for so many, I try every year to look for the helpers— and devote a thread to the Rescue dogs of 9/11-
❤️
Walk with me and get to know the goodest pups of all.
BRETAGNE (Britney) ❤️
Bretagne was just two years old at the time of the 9/11 attacks. She and Denise Corliss, her owner and handler, worked at Ground Zero for 10 days as their mission went from rescue to recovery.
Bretagne was the last surviving 9/11 search and rescue dog until June 6, 2016, when she was laid to rest just before she turned 17 years old.
As Bretagne entered the animal hospital in Cypress, Texas, firefighters and search and rescue workers from the fire department lined the sidewalk and saluted. She was carried out later, her body draped in an American flag. A statue erected in her honor.