What's happening with Russian economy? Logistics market is a good indicator. Consider the freight rates. Since late February they fall by 30-40%. For example, according to the freight exchange ATI.SU rates on Moscow-St Petersburg direction fall by 34,3% (not🧵)
Moscow - St Petersburg highway connects the largest city of the country with its main seaport. It is for Russia what Camino Real (Mexico-Veracruz) was for the Colonial Mexico. With the St Petersburg seaport traffic decreasing almost by half, there's much less to deliver
How much did the freight rates fall across Russia? Estimates vary, plus rates on different directions probably fall unevenly. Most common estimates would vary between 30-40%, with some (Oboz company) giving as low estimates as 25% and some (Deliver company) giving as high as 50%
The fall in the freight rate reflects the general decrease in the interregional trade. There's now much less to ship = the rates are falling. And yet, the actual costs of freight are skyrocketing for the shortage of trucks and spare parts. The cost of the latter increased by 70%
The import dependence of Russian truck companies may look surprising considering that on paper Russia import substituted greatly. Theoretically, most Russian trucks are either Russian (Kamaz, GAZ, ZIL, Ural) or Belarusian-produced (MAZ). Consider the figures for December 2021
In practice Russian car industry is fully import dependent. Consider this interview with a leader of a trade union on the AvtoVAZ automobile manufacturer. All the machine tools, all the instruments, all the equipment is imported. And it is imported *not* from China
Many misunderstand the role of China in the world economy. They confuse it being the largest industrial exporter with being the most important exporter of *everything*. For example it exports far less machine tools than one would expect. Germany is more important in this respect
What information can we draw from the Russian freight market data? First of all, we are seeing as the enormous country is gradually losing its cohesion. Consider that all three means of transport: airways, automobiles and even the railways are heavily import dependent
The situation with freight rates falling by 30-40% and the spare parts prices increasing by 70% is unsustainable especially considering that the average truck in Russia is 21 years old. Very soon communicating or trading with faraway provinces will turn into a major problem
Furthermore, the freight data allows us to track the main smuggling channels that Russia is now using. While demand on most directions is falling there is one direction with a skyrocketing demand (more than +100%). It's Georgia. Ergo, it is the major smuggling channel now
I took the figures on the Russia freight market dynamics from here. Overall, I consider the RBC to be a highly reliable source on the Russian economy. End of not a 🧵 rbc.ru/business/06/06…
I cut the fragment with the AvtoVAZ trade union leader talking on his factory's import dependency from here. You can watch the material in full, it presents the position of workers and trade union leadership. I think it's good
PPS To my best knowledge the most astute, informed and unbiased overviews of Russian economy and its dynamics can be found in Russian Central Bank reports. They are amazing and incredibly informative
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What I am saying is that "capitalist reforms" are a buzzword devoid of any actual meaning, and a buzzword that obfuscated rather than explains. Specifically, it is fusing radically different policies taken under the radically different circumstances (and timing!) into one - purely for ideological purposes
It can be argued, for example, that starting from the 1980s, China has undertaken massive socialist reforms, specifically in infrastructure, and in basic (mother) industries, such as steel, petrochemical and chemical and, of course, power
The primary weakness of this argument is that being true, historically speaking, it is just false in the context of American politics where the “communism” label has been so over-used (and misapplied) that it lost all of its former power:
“We want X”
“No, that is communism”
“We want communism”
Basically, when you use a label like “communism” as a deus ex machina winning you every argument, you simultaneously re-define its meaning. And when you use it to beat off every popular socio economic demand (e.g. universal healthcare), you re-define communism as a synthesis of all the popular socio economic demands
Historical communism = forced industrial development in a poor, predominantly agrarian country, funded through expropriation of the peasantry
(With the most disastrous economic and humanitarian consequences)
Many are trying to explain his success with some accidental factors such as his “personal charisma”, Cuomo's weakness etc
Still, I think there may be some fundamental factors here. A longue durée shift, and a very profound one
1. Public outrage does not work anymore
If you look at Zohran, he is calm, constructive, and rarely raises his voice. I think one thing that Mamdani - but almost no one else in the American political space is getting - is that the public is getting tired of the outrage
Outrage, anger, righteous indignation have all been the primary drivers of American politics for quite a while
For a while, this tactics worked
Indeed, when everyone around is polite, and soft (and insincere), freaking out was a smart thing to do. It could help you get noticed
People don’t really understand causal links. We pretend we do (“X results in Y”). But we actually don’t. Most explanations (= descriptions of causal structures) are fake.
There may be no connection between X and Y at all. The cause is just misattributed.
Or, perhaps, X does indeed result in Y. but only under a certain (and unknown!) set of conditions that remains totally and utterly opaque to us. So, X->Y is only a part of the equation
And so on
I like to think of a hypothetical Stone Age farmer who started farming, and it worked amazingly, and his entire community adopted his lifestyle, and many generations followed it and prospered and multiplied, until all suddenly wiped out in a new ice age
1. Normative Islamophobia that used to define the public discourse being the most acceptable form of racial & ethnic bigotry in the West, is receding. It is not so much dying as rather - failing to replicate. It is not that the old people change their views as that the young do not absorb their prejudice any longer.
In fact, I incline to think it has been failing to replicate for a while, it is just that we have not been paying attention
Again, the change of vibe does not happen at once. The Muslim scare may still find (some) audience among the more rigid elderly, who are not going to change their views. But for the youth, it is starting to sound as archaic as the Catholic scare of know nothings
Out of date
2. What is particularly interesting regarding Mamdani's victory, is his support base. It would not be much of an exaggeration to say that its core is comprised of the young (and predominantly white) middle classes, with a nearly equal representation of men and women
What does Musk vs Trump affair teach us about the general patterns of human history? Well, first of all it shows that the ancient historians were right. They grasped something about nature of politics that our contemporaries simply can’t.
Let me give you an example. The Arab conquest of Spain
According to a popular medieval/early modern interpretation, its primary cause was the lust of Visigoth king Roderic. Aroused by the beautiful daughter of his vassal and ally, count Julian, he took advantage of her
Disgruntled, humiliated Julian allied himself with the Arabs and opens them the gates of Spain.
Entire kingdom lost, all because the head of state caused a personal injury to someone important.