Wanted to do a follow-up on the SPO Varna 'flamethrower' as there isn't much written about in either English or Russian. Introduced circa 2005, it was designed to compliment the RPO Schmel' and RPO PDM-A Priz line of launchers. Its RKhBZ code is MO.1.09.00
The launcher is the same as the RPO-A (marked with a red cross on the end caps), but inside, they are very different. The RPO fires a fin stabilised projectile filled with thermobaric, incendiary or smoke producing mixtures. The SPO houses a canister with a fixed launch motor.
The actual 'projectile' is a sausage like mesh 'bag' containing an incendiary mixture. In this case, 2.5 kg of OM-12 pyrogel, the same as used in the RPO-Z. The rear of the mesh container is fitted with some kind of igniter compound, which is itself ignited at launch.
The canister with attached launch motor are fired out of the muzzle of the launch tube, and falls to the ground, a few meters away. This canister does not appear to serve the function of a 'barrel extension' like on the RPO PDM-A.
You can see on this photo that the 'sausage' has already cleared the muzzle whilst the front end of the canister is only just protruding out. A note on those filaments of gel like matter we can see. Not 100% sure on the purpose, but it could be a gel sealant to help
protect the OM-12 from humidity, as pyrogels can auto-ignite on contact with water. Or its pyrogel leaking out of the mesh container and this thing is very unsafe ! In the video below, the shooter actually burns his hand with the first shot.
The payload with the burning ignition compound is projected towards the target, and when it comes into contact with a solid object, the mesh ruptures and the pyrogel ignites over a small area. Pyrogels typically burn for a few minutes at temps between 1.4k to 1.6k °C.
Now it may not look as impressive as the blast of an RPO-A, or the big goutes of flame produced by something like an LPO-50, but remember this is meant to be fired into confined spaces, inside rooms or caves, bunkers.... The very high local temps generated are intended to ignite
Most flammable materials (furniture, fabrics etc...) in its radius, and of course exposure to such high temperatures would be very detrimental to human physiology. In many ways, the SPO is closer to a traditional flamethrower than its predecessors.
🧵So a few weeks ago, I got to try out IWI's Arbel, a computerised electronic fire control system, that unlike other FCS', does not rely on a electro-optical based solution.
The Arbel system exists in two forms: a lower receiver for the Arad (and other AR pattern rifles) and a pistol grip module for the Negev family of MGs.
So how does the system work ? All it's doing is just slowing down the RoF, right ? Well not quite. There is a bit more going on. The heart of Arbel is a MEMS unit paired with a computing unit and a proprietary algorithm.
🧵Some stuff I've picked up from the 🇰🇵 parade yesterday (will be adding to it progressively). Starting off with this thing. Some kind of magazine fed self-loading grenade launcher perhaps ?
The rather bulky design of the ERA solution highlights the challenges of integrating ERA to lightly armoured vehicles. Its not quite a simple as slapping some Kontakt-1/5 on the sides of the hulll and calling it a day. In fact doing just that can make things worse.
So what can go wrong ? Well, ERA, especially the early types, often can't completely stop a SCJ, there is often a residual element, usually the tip, that makes it through before the flyer plates can come apart. Hence why you still need backing armour to absorb it.
The AK-12M1, allegedly will enter production next year. Introduces some changes based on feedback from 🇺🇦. Features the new stock/ cheek rest combo and ambi fire selector from the AK-12SP. An AK-19 style, fixed flash suppressor replaces the earlier pattern brake.
The traditional rear AK sight, or the 2nd Gen diopter, have been replaced by a flip-up aperture. A 'П' battle sight (0.5 - 200 m, with additional night sight) and 600 m apertures are available. The 🇫🇮 and 🇮🇱 did this decades ago...
The new ambi selector ditches the 2-round burst capability, and apparently, also now mechanically locks the bolt when the safety is engaged (rather than just blocking the bolt's full range of rearward travel).
The recent-ish procurement by 🇫🇷 and the 🇳🇱 of Hirtenberger's M6C-640 Mk1 60 mm commando mortar, examplifies, I think, why NATO standardisation in ammunition is often less straight forward in practice than in concept. A little🧵:
It took the 🇳🇱 almost 4 years to qualify the M6C, with deliveries of 155 weapons having taken place in 2015. Ammunition qualification was completed in 2018, with the DMO granting full qualification for use with the Army, Marines and SF in early 2019. Why so long ?
Well, in 2016 two 🇳🇱 service members were killed, and another injured in Mali when a 60 mm mortar bomb suffered an in-bore premature detonation during a training excersive in Kidal 🇲🇱. The investigation found that the fuze malfunctioned due to heat and moisture exposure
Been pouring over some Sig patents for the their LMG, and thought I'd highlight some minor design changes from the production MX250 compared to the first prototype I saw in 2019. These are external changes of course, not much has been publicly disclosed about the internals so far
The production model (left) now has a continuous length M-LOK interface on the underside, and the profile of the upper portion has been tweaked. The prodution XM250 has lost its side folding stock capability, due to the necessesity of a battery pack for the powered rail.
Aside to some minor profile tweaks here and there, it doesn't appear to have changed all that much. Of course there is the 'rail on a rail' to properly accomodate the XM157, without interferring with the feed cover. Kinda validates the FN Evolys' design in that department.