Wanted to do a follow-up on the SPO Varna 'flamethrower' as there isn't much written about in either English or Russian. Introduced circa 2005, it was designed to compliment the RPO Schmel' and RPO PDM-A Priz line of launchers. Its RKhBZ code is MO.1.09.00
The launcher is the same as the RPO-A (marked with a red cross on the end caps), but inside, they are very different. The RPO fires a fin stabilised projectile filled with thermobaric, incendiary or smoke producing mixtures. The SPO houses a canister with a fixed launch motor.
The actual 'projectile' is a sausage like mesh 'bag' containing an incendiary mixture. In this case, 2.5 kg of OM-12 pyrogel, the same as used in the RPO-Z. The rear of the mesh container is fitted with some kind of igniter compound, which is itself ignited at launch.
The canister with attached launch motor are fired out of the muzzle of the launch tube, and falls to the ground, a few meters away. This canister does not appear to serve the function of a 'barrel extension' like on the RPO PDM-A.
You can see on this photo that the 'sausage' has already cleared the muzzle whilst the front end of the canister is only just protruding out. A note on those filaments of gel like matter we can see. Not 100% sure on the purpose, but it could be a gel sealant to help
protect the OM-12 from humidity, as pyrogels can auto-ignite on contact with water. Or its pyrogel leaking out of the mesh container and this thing is very unsafe ! In the video below, the shooter actually burns his hand with the first shot.
The payload with the burning ignition compound is projected towards the target, and when it comes into contact with a solid object, the mesh ruptures and the pyrogel ignites over a small area. Pyrogels typically burn for a few minutes at temps between 1.4k to 1.6k °C.
Now it may not look as impressive as the blast of an RPO-A, or the big goutes of flame produced by something like an LPO-50, but remember this is meant to be fired into confined spaces, inside rooms or caves, bunkers.... The very high local temps generated are intended to ignite
Most flammable materials (furniture, fabrics etc...) in its radius, and of course exposure to such high temperatures would be very detrimental to human physiology. In many ways, the SPO is closer to a traditional flamethrower than its predecessors.
Been pouring over some Sig patents for the their LMG, and thought I'd highlight some minor design changes from the production MX250 compared to the first prototype I saw in 2019. These are external changes of course, not much has been publicly disclosed about the internals so far
The production model (left) now has a continuous length M-LOK interface on the underside, and the profile of the upper portion has been tweaked. The prodution XM250 has lost its side folding stock capability, due to the necessesity of a battery pack for the powered rail.
Aside to some minor profile tweaks here and there, it doesn't appear to have changed all that much. Of course there is the 'rail on a rail' to properly accomodate the XM157, without interferring with the feed cover. Kinda validates the FN Evolys' design in that department.
The recently published @RUSI_org co-published by @Jack_Watling & Nick Reynolds is very much worth a read. I wanted to highlight some passages of the first chapter, focussing on the battle of Kiev, as these snippets do provide some worthwhile insights 1/x
Especially in the context of the Ukrainian experience of the battle, viewed through Twitter, something we don't to get a lot of. So first, caveats: Twitter is an echo chamber, like all social media. A lot of commentators are pro-Ukrainian, and a lot of the media coming out 2/x
of this conflict have put emphasis on Ukrainian successes, something which the Russians have difficulty in countering, from an 'information warfare' point of view. To me at least, a prevailing percpetion of how the battle was going went a little something like this: 3/x