Dilan Esper Profile picture
Jun 7 6 tweets 2 min read
Colorado prosecutors falsely accused defendant of rape, convicted him, destroyed DNA evidence that could have exonerated him, and when the actual rapist confessed, threatened HIM with perjury charges, causing him to recant. 1/ #appellatetwitter

ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/fil…
Eventually, when the real rapist once again confessed, forcing a vacation of the defendant's conviction, the Colorado prosecutors tried him again! This time, the jury acquitted him. This guy spent approximately TWENTY SEVEN YEARS in prison. 2/
That included 20 years after the destroyed DNA test, and three years after the prosecutors threatened the perjury charge against the confessor. Held, his 1983 suit was properly dismissed- no constitutional violations. 3/
Obviously a lot went wrong here and it's highly outrageous in many ways. But the threat of perjury charges really got me- prosecutors are supposed to be about doing justice, not winning cases. But these jerks acted like the worst sort of win-at-all-cost competitors. 4/
We should consider making it a crime, with serious prison time & a special prosecutor to bring charges, whenever a prosecutor attempts to interfere with testimony that could exonerate a defendant. That's obstruction of justice the same as when the mob tampers with a witness. 5/
Prosecutors who do this should also face a bar investigation. It should be made very clear that the to all prosecutors ONLY proper response to new evidence that calls in doubt a conviction is "thank you for doing your civic duty". End/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dilan Esper

Dilan Esper Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dilanesper

Jun 9
I think these ideas- especially leasing out federal land for abortion clinics- are good.

But they all illustrate the fact that pro-lifers are like bad chess players who never even think one move ahead. Their plan was Overturn Roe = abortion stops. 1/

cnn.com/2022/06/09/pol…
As usual, it makes me harken back to Prohibition- if you don't actually convince the public of your deeply held moral position, and the public rejects it, they're gonna circumvent whatever law you pass. 2/

dilanesper.substack.com/p/a-brief-hist…
Did pro-lifers really not understand that pro-choicers would do anything in their power to preserve abortion access because they really believe in it? And now pro-lifers will of course respond by trying to prevent circumvention of their bans. And the country will tear apart. 3/
Read 5 tweets
Jun 9
Since I have some Republican followers, I want to say something to y'all. You've seen me rant about polarization- but polarization also hurts your causes too. California is a great example of this. We haven't had a competitive statewide GOP since 1994. 1/
Yes, Schwarzenegger got elected 2 terms, but he needed a recall election (bypassing a GOP primary) to do it and he was a big celebrity. Other than that, it's been a complete wipeout for the GOP.

You might write this off as "we're a blue state". But think about this. 2/
Did you see the results of liberal San Francisco's last 2 elections? Boudin is the sexier one, but the one before ousted school board members who tried to get rid of standardized testing & objective measurements of academic performance, and did a lot of woke school renamings. 3/
Read 9 tweets
Jun 9
Here's a Hot Take political theory: when problems are basically unsolveable, voters select the party that they think cares more about the problem.

So, for instance, Democrats have always had an advantage on health care even when reforming the system seemed hopeless. 1/
Voters assumed that whatever could be done to improve health care, the Democrats were more likely to do it because they are perceived to care about health care more than Republicans do.

Similarly, the GOP has an advantage on crime even if voters see it as uncontrollable. 2/
Voters assume that whatever marginal benefit there is from crime-fighting, Republicans are more likely to capture it because they are perceived to care more about stopping crime than Democrats do. 3/
Read 4 tweets
Jun 9
My somewhat contrarian opinion on Democrats and the police issue is that "Defund/Abolish" didn't hurt the party so much (it's clear most Democratic pols didn't support it), but the denialism/encouragement of violence and vandalism in 2020 by lefty elites hurt the Dems a lot.
When people are burning down police stations, attacking federal courthouses, occupying portions of cities, and looting innocent businesses, the only politically viable position is unequivocal condemnation of it. Not "technically 96% of the protesters were nonviolent".
Not "a riot is the language of the dispossessed". Not "don't call it a riot, it's a rebellion, an uprising". Not "it's only property damage, and property can be replaced".
Read 5 tweets
Jun 9
By the way, more generally on this, NEVER underestimate how much of American car culture is premised on a dislike of class-mixing. Many Americans think (wrongly, but they think it) that public transit's so unsafe that they are better off spending 2 hours driving in the rush hour
Obviously, if you are transit advocate, this frustrates you- first of all because you are the sort of person who isn't afraid of class mixing and dislike the prejudices inherent in it! But also because it means transit has to be inefficient and less egalitarian to draw riders.
And a related issue- this is why I doubt any large transit system in America is ever going to go to free transit. If you don't have to pay any fare at all, the middle class is just going to assume that the trains and buses are going to be filled with the homeless and criminals.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 9
I think there's an obvious reason why they follow this pricing strategy, though it's kind of politically incorrect to say it.
Your holy grail in transit is to try and get middle class car owners to take the train. Every such person who does that is an enormous win-win both for transit and the environment.

And middle class people are assumed not to want to ride trains that are full of poor people.
Now maybe that assumption's wrong, but I bet the transit agencies have all sorts of data on this. And I know, anecdotally, that discussions of transit with suburbanites in Los Angeles OFTEN get hung up on the feeling that transit's full of filth and criminality.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(