The Actuaries Institute has released our latest estimates of excess deaths in Australia. Main analysis uses ABS data to end-Feb 22. Estimate of COVID-19 only excess mortality for March-May 22 also included. #ExcessDeaths#CovidAus @ActuariesInst@Actuarialeye
Total excess mortality for the first two months of 2022 is estimated to be 15% (+4,000 deaths); 18% in January and 13% in February. Importantly, this is measured relative to expected mortality had there been no pandemic.
Over the two months, 10% of excess mortality is due due to COVID-19 alone (+2,500 deaths)
An additional 5% (+1,500) of excess mortality is due to non-COVID-19 deaths.
Deaths from all respiratory disease are a little lower than predicted.
(Note we have also shown expected deaths if experience follows 2020-21; this will be more interesting once we have data for the winter peak.)
Deaths from cancer are as predicted, but all other causes of death have experienced substantially more deaths than expected in Jan/Feb 22.
(Graphs for each individual cause can be found in the link in the first tweet.)
ABS data shows that in the months of Jan/Feb 2022, there were 401 deaths in people who were COVID-19 positive at death but where COVID-19 was not the primary cause of death. i.e. COVID-19 was a contributory factor in around 30% of the excess mortality from non-COVID-19 causes.
The ABS estimate of excess mortality for doctor-certified deaths only for Jan/Feb 22 (23%) is higher than ours (17%). This is because:
- the ABS predicted values incorporate the lower-than-expected mortality in 2020
- we allow for late-reported deaths.
We estimate that COVID-19 deaths alone will result in excess mortality of around 6% (+2,500) for the months of March to May 2022.
(3,054 surveillance deaths less 15%-20% for deaths "with" COVID-19.)
Across the pandemic, our conservative estimate is that Australia had experienced 5,500 excess deaths by the end of May 2022 (an average excess mortality rate of about 1% to 1.5% over the pandemic).
The rest of this thread talks about how we have set our baseline to estimate predicted deaths.
*********
We decided to continue to estimate our baseline "in the absence of a pandemic", making measurement and analysis of excess mortality more meaningful.
Until now, we have used the 2015-19 years as the basis for our projections, but these years are getting old.
However we cannot use the 2020-21 years without adjustment as they are not "pre-pandemic". At the same time, it is hard/impossible to separate out pandemic effects.
As such, we have: 1. not included any COVID-19 deaths in the baseline; these would not exist in the absence of the pandemic 2. used 2015-19 to set our baseline for respiratory and dementia deaths; 2020-21 experience for these causes was materially affected by the pandemic
3. used 2015-21 to set our baseline for deaths from all other causes and for coroner-referred deaths; it is likely that 2020-21 experience more closely reflects a slow-down in underlying mortality improvement than the impacts of the pandemic.
ends/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Excellent summary, noting the baseline is no longer “assuming no pandemic”.
Actual weekly deaths are mostly within the 95% confidence interval. However, most weeks in June, July and August were above the prediction and this is significant in aggregate for the eight-month period.
The Mortality Working Group has today published our Research Paper covering excess mortality in 2020-2023. actuaries.asn.au/public-policy-…
It is a massive paper (100+ pages), so I'm not going to cover off all of it!
This thread gives a taster of what is included in the paper, and is aimed at those who may want to delve further into the nitty-gritty.
There are four main sections of our paper (plus an into in section 1).
Section 2 cover excess mortality for Australia. This formally documents the excess mortality blogs we published throughout 2023. For those who have been following me, the numbers will look familiar.
The Mortality Working Group of the Actuaries Institute has released their latest estimate of excess mortality for Q1 2024.
TLDR: excess mortality is 1%, noting this is measured against the new baseline. actuaries.digital/2024/07/10/exc…
Our new baseline measures 2024 mortality against 2023 (after allowing for some mortality improvement), and includes and allowance for COVID-19 deaths.
Deaths from all causes have been within the 95% confidence interval in each of the first thirteen weeks of 2024, although they have been towards the top of that range for three of the last four weeks of March.
"Australia appears to have had at least a week where no COVID-associated deaths were recorded for the first time in more than two years."
This is simply not true. The statement is based on this Fed Health graph.
Yes, it does show a 7-day average of zero deaths for the most recent data points. But this ignores the fact that the graph is compiled using date of death, and it is almost impossible for someone to die, have their death registered, and included in the Fed data within a week!
The Mortality Working Group of the Actuaries Institute has released our estimate of excess mortality for the full year 2023.
TLDR: Excess mortality for 2023 is 5% (95% CI: 3%-7%) or +8,400 deaths.
A thread/ actuaries.digital/2024/04/05/exc…
Note that our expected number of deaths (baseline) is our expectation had the pandemic not happened.
The baseline allows for changes in the age and size composition of the population over time, plus allows for pre-pandemic mortality trend to continue.
We finished the year with deaths being much higher than expected for each of the four weeks in December (as they were in November).
Australian deaths counts: surveillance vs death certificates.
For some time now I have been quizzically looking at the death surveillance reporting, thinking the numbers looked too low.
A thread/
This is because of the relationship between hospitalisations and deaths.
Normally deaths track hospital admissions quite closely, but with a little bit of a lag. But for Dec23 and Jan24, this relationship changed - deaths are lower than expected based on hospitalisations.
A few theories were floating around about why (eg. JN.1 less severe), but it also didnt make sense to me from looking at the Vic death reporting, and knowing the Vic wave was a bit earlier than the rest of Aust. Things just werent stacking up nicely.