How to explain America's bizarre attitudes about student debt, and the policies that promote it? We've foolishly sacralized spending on higher education.
2/ Young Americans and their families are encouraged to assume whatever student debt necessary -- by not only policymakers, but also a culture that equates the practice with “investing in your future” and institutions that cash the checks upfront and are never held accountable.
3/ In how many movies does the teenager, discovering his family’s financial troubles, concede gloomily that he can abandon his first-choice school and attend the state university nearby, only for a determined parent to insist, no, we will find a way?
4/ The cognitive dissonance between the unquestioned commitment to extravagant spending on higher education and the questionable value of that spending is what yields America’s bizarre discourse around student-loan debt.
5/ On one hand, under the presumption that degrees are precious and consistently produce a high return on investment, American law uniquely excludes student loans from discharge in bankruptcy.
6/ You can run up tens of thousands of dollars of credit card debt taking vacations and walk out of bankruptcy court owing nothing. But the debt you incurred for the life-changing wonders of time on a college campus, that must stay with you indefinitely.
7/ On the other hand, because the debt rests on a foolish and fractured social promise, progressive politicians are now demanding that the government wipe it away altogether -- at the extreme equating its very existence with “violence.”
8/ Student-debt forgiveness is just a further foolish step down the path of treating higher-ed spending as special, and only compounds the underlying problem. Instead we should make clear that student debt is just, well, debt. Like other debt. Make it dischargeable in bankruptcy.
9/ Our bankruptcy system does a very good job of offering a fresh start to those who genuinely need one. Leaving the debtor to make the difficult-by-design decision is much preferable to political attempts at sorting borrowers into those deserving and undeserving of help.
10/ Once we've placed student loans on equal footing with other debt, we should also stop subsidizing and promoting them. The median state's in-state, public university tuition is about $8,000. Offer a Pell Grant to cover half of that. That's it.
11/ "Oh no, where will students find the other financing they need?" Loaning large amounts of money to teenagers with uncertain prospects and no collateral is a bad idea for lenders because it is a bad idea, period. We shouldn't be finding ways to get those loans issued anyway.
12/ Fortunately, institutions exist that are perfectly positioned to finance tuition, have the right information, and have the right incentives. The universities. If we take away all the subsidies, they'll provide the financing themselves, and be on the hook for results.
13/ "With loans dischargeable in bankruptcy, subsidies limited to a straightforward grant, and providers responsible for financing the investments they promise to facilitate, the white-washed 'ivory towers' would lose much of their magical allure." americancompass.org/essays/the-ban…
14/ College administrators who say this model would not work are really just admitting that THEIR models do not work, absent a nation entranced by their mystical incantations. Good to know. Let them, not their students, suffer the consequences. The End. americancompass.org/essays/the-ban…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Interesting: "@CliffordAsness has some complaints about private equity managers.
"In an hour-long Morningstar podcast, the AQR co-founder questioned whether private equity firms could really earn excess returns compared with public securities." institutionalinvestor.com/article/b1y9pp…
@CliffordAsness "In a press briefing on Wednesday, Amundi’s chief investment officer Vincent Mortier said that “some parts of private equity look like a pyramid scheme” as assets change hands at swollen prices in sponsor-to-sponsor deals." institutionalinvestor.com/article/b1y9pp…
@CliffordAsness "Mohamed El-Erian also wrote in a FT op-ed this week that private markets aren’t a haven for investors seeking stability. Private equity firms that tout themselves as such “may prove to [have] too much bravado and misplaced self-confidence,” he wrote." institutionalinvestor.com/article/b1y9pp…
1/ Probably the question I'm most often asked is how and why I became so skeptical of free-market dogma. This essay attempts an answer, traveling from my Econ 101 class to Mitt Romney's presidential campaign back to Smith and Ricardo and forward to today. americancompass.org/essays/searchi…
2/ A few days before China’s formal accession to the WTO, I composed my first policy memo on the merits of free trade. I still have the paper, written in the confident and unquestioning tone that my freshman self thought appropriate for a practitioner of the economic sciences...
3/ ...though with hindsight it seems more the tone of a recent convert to a fundamentalist sect, which I suppose I was. “There is no question,” I began, “that free international trade increases a society’s economic surplus.” americancompass.org/essays/searchi…
Important new @AmerCompass Atlas today on the catastrophic failure of America's college-for-all education model.
Nowhere else in American life is the allocation of public resources so misaligned with the needs and preferences of the American people. 🧵americancompass.org/a-guide-to-col…
2/ Let's start with some context: most developed countries rely on vocational education. In OECD countries, 35-55% of upper secondary students are typically on that track. The OECD actually excludes the U.S. from the data because we have no comparable system.
3/ Instead, in America, we equate equal opportunity and "making it" with college attendance. Here's Barack Obama: "Where you start should not determine where you end up. And so I’m glad that everybody wants to go to college." obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-offi…
One of the major recent developments in American politics is the nasty divorce underway between the Republican Party and conservatives on one side and the Chamber of Commerce and big business on the other. What's causing the breakup? 🧵
One theory, advanced by @MichaelRStrain@AEI, is that American enterprise is the innocent victim here. Corporate leaders are merely: (1) standing up for civic responsibility, and (2) embracing cultural progressivism as a marketing tactic. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
There's a contradiction here: corporations genuinely committed to civic responsibility would presumably shy away from promoting racially divisive ideology, delisting books, undermining democratically enacted laws, etc. The "responsibility" being exercised is rather selective...
🚨🧵🚨 New survey from @AmerCompass, "Not What They Bargained For," paints a fascinating portrait of an American labor movement that has totally alienated the workers it purports to represent, thanks to its focus on political activism. Let's dive in... americancompass.org/essays/not-wha…
@AmerCompass 2/ Lower- and working-class Americans are much less likely than their middle- and upper-class counterparts to want politicians to speak favorably about labor unions. Not that they want to hear them speaking unfavorably. Most just don't care, or don't want to hear about it.
3/ Zoom in on the core that we call "potential union members" -- people working 30+ hours per week at a for-profit company -- and only 35% say they would vote for a union. They're almost as likely to say they would be undecided, or to say they would be opposed.
I've always been amused by lefties whining about funding after they've lost the substantive argument, but I guess we'll have get used to it from Conservative Inc. too. nationalreview.com/2021/08/does-a…
There are no coherent arguments about policy here, just lame formulations underscoring the lack of an actual point ("raises questions," "raises concerns," "Is that what is going on?").
At @AmerCompass, we've laid out a comprehensive case for the importance of labor to a well-functioning economy, limited government, and stronger civic institutions. If @MichaelWatsonDC disagrees, I'd of course welcome his counterarguments. americancompass.org/in-focus/seat-…