Do you get confused with the nomenclature of establishments in the @IAF_MCC ? Words like Comd/Wing/Station/ FBSU/ C&MU confuse you? This abridged thread tries to explain the structural philosophy which the IAF has followed, initially borrowed from the RAF. #IAFHistory (1/16)
The IAF HQ in Delhi is essentially divided along the Ops, Maint & Adm verticals. Its 5 geographical & 2 functional command HQs are likewise divided. Each Comd oversees numerous Stations that are largely functional in nature. These stations are named as per their functions. 2/
While Air Forces like the USAF & PAF have named their Stations after luminaries of their service, the IAF has largely stuck to numbering them (with very few recent exceptions) 3/
But it was not always like this. The IAF org has developed gradually over the years to be able to adapt to contemporary times. While some of that org is retained, others have been altered/modified. This thread attempts to clear the air. 4/
As early as the 1920s, the RAF had divided itself into three main functional domains – Operations (Flying and everything associated with flying), Maintenance & Administration. That fundamental structure remains the bedrock of IAF setup even today. 5/
Let’s take AirHQ of 1940s as an example. Its earliest setup had two verticals under- a “Senior Air Staff Officer (SASO)” & an “Air Offr IC Admin (AOA)”. Due to lack of Engrg Offrs in the initial yrs,Maint came under the AOA This structure was replicated in the lower tiers. 6/
In the years following indep, two verticals – those of ‘Maintenance’ & ‘Personnel’ were hived off the AOA’s charter & given an indep hierarchy. As of today, six verticals report directly to the chief. Originally manned by Air Cmde, these verticals are not headed by Air Mshls 7/
The next tier comprised the precursors of present-day Comd HQs. These were the No 1 Op Group & No 2 Trg Group. These Gps had stations/Sqns under their control. In 1947, No.1 Op Group comprised all of India and was the formation that won the Kashmir war under Baba Mehar Singh 8/
No 1 Op Group kept getting revived and disbanded repeatedly and to date has lived four avatars in the IAF. It is the only formation that can claim to be the forefather of no less than three Operational Commands of today! Hopefully, someday it will rise again! 9/
In 1949 both Groups (Op & Trg) were upgraded to Commands, this was to bring parity between Army and IAF. Other than No. 1 Group, this nomenclature did not survive. A “Wing” remains the highest estb within a command. 10/
At the time of independence, IAF had just 2 wings (Stations at Palam & Poona). But by the early 60s, the number was nearly 20. In addition, Transport Trg Wing, Fighter Trg Wing, 10 Adm Wing also came up as extensions of the philosophy. These institutions exist to this date. 11/
IAF has many airstrips, not all of which need to be wings. Thus came about the "Care & Maintenance unit" where an airbase had skeleton staff that kept the base operational for occasional flying. The famous battle of Longewala was fought when W/C MS Bawa activated 14 C&MU . 12/
Another mini-wing concept that emerged was the "Forward Base Supply Unit" (FBSU), which had a full setup of staff to support flying ops, but did not have sqns/units based permanently, but would visit on detachments round the year. FBSUs tended to be closer to the borders. 13/
One lesser-used nomenclature was that of Staging Post (SP). No. 1 SP functioned at Car Nicobar for refuelling of ac flying lgs msns from the mainland across the Bay of Bengal. This remains the only known Staging Post. 14/
An even lesser-known unit was MEMU (Mobile Echelon Maintenance Unit). Amritsar & Sirsa were 4 & 5 MEMU’s respectively in the early 70s. Over time, C&MU grew to FBSU which grew into Wings as the size of IAF increased and the role of each unit expanded. 15/
These Stns-no matter what their name-continue to host various units – some pertaining to flying, others to maint & adm. Units are generally mobile, as this interesting read from the Natl Archives indicates. “Stations” however, are static formations that serve units. 15/
In the operational sense, it is the units that do the war fighting – directly or indirectly. Thus, a Unit is the tip of the IAF’s spear and the wing/command the brains, the hand that indirectly wields it. 16/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 1973, when princely titles were history, Jamnagar’s ruler Shatrusalyasinhji D. Jadeja entered uniform as Honorary Wing Commander. The Indian Air Force did not honour a title; it honoured a man who kept serving after titles stopped mattering. (1/14)
#IAFHistory
In 1950, under H.H. Digvijaysinhji's guidance, Jamnagar opened an Indian Air Force station. Roads were laid, land and clearances came quickly, and the base was treated as a civic priority from day one. The bond began as stewardship, not ceremony. 2/
In 1952, Jamnagar gifted an eight-inch silver pilot on wood that went each term to the “most promising” trainee at Jodhpur’s No. 2 Air Force Academy. It rewarded potential over pedigree—an early sign of how the house chose to back the IAF. 3/
Meant to hide at a quiet base, the @IAF_MCC MiG-21 instead made a home at Chandigarh. A six-month stopgap became four decades. The place where the story begins and ends. Here’s how it unfolded. 🧵(1/16)
#MiG21Nuggets #IAFHistory
After Independence, the IAF used “type bases”: Pune had Tempests, Kalaikunda had Mystères, Ambala had Hunters. That tidy system was still in place when the MiG-21 came up for induction. 2/
Before the team left for the USSR, AVM Pinto told CO designate, (then) Wg Cdr Dilbagh Singh the first MiG-21 squadron would go to Adampur—quiet, remote and ideal for secrecy. 3/
This, right here 👇🏽—is the real reason the MiG-21 earned the "flying coffin" tag. No, it wasn’t the LCA delay. No it wasnt the machine or spares itself.
The real cause lies deeper. The data and context are all there. Few connect the dots. Read On. (1/19)
#IAFHistory
I wrote about this in a @timesofindia editorial a few years ago. The MiG-21 earned the “Flying Coffin” tag not because of its airframe—but because we made it carry the weight of our institutional failure between 1980s -2000s. 2/
The MiG-21 entered IAF service in 1963, our first supersonic jet. It demanded a steep learning curve—especially in landing, where speeds exceeded 300 km/h. That was 2–3x faster than subsonic jets like the Vampire. It was not beginner-friendly. 3/
1/ There's growing confusion between two important systems:
👉🏽 Akashteer
👉🏽 IACCS
Both play crucial roles in India’s air defence.
But let’s be clear — they operate at different altitudes — literally and metaphorically.
Here’s how 👇 (1/8)
#IAFHistory
But, let’s get some history, geography and law right.
History: The Network Centric Warfare (NCW) concept was first developed by Vice Admiral Arthur Cebrowski (US Navy) and John Garstka in 1998. It envisioned linking forces digitally to enhance situational awareness and increase warfighting effectiveness.
2/
📕 Let’s talk law — the Union War Book is India’s master document on war responsibilities.
Until 1993, there was no single agency for air defence.
Each service did its bit, and consequently the Army built up significant frontline/terminal AD assets.
Then came a historic shift:
🛡️ “Air Defence of the country is the responsibility of the IAF.”
As we rightly marvel at the IACCS Air Defence system in action earlier this month…
What many forget is that the trigger for IACCS wasn't war.
It was this:
➡️ The Purulia Arms Drop of 1995.
🛩️ Crates of AKs parachuted into Bengal, and no one saw it coming.
🧵👇
#IAFHistory
17 Dec 1995. A Latvian AN-26 aircraft drops weapons over Purulia.
Undetected. Unchallenged.
India was stunned.
A Group of Ministers review followed—and a national embarrassment turned into a call for reform.
At the heart of it: India’s airspace surveillance. 2/
Among the key recommendations -
✅ Procurement of an Integrated Air Command and Control System (IACCS) for the IAF.
Initial approval: ₹585 Cr for 5 systems.
Approved in principle by Raksha Mantri (1999) & CCS (2001).