There is a story doing the news rounds this morning that Sunak has cost the government £11 billion by failing to manage government interest rates properly. But the real story is much worse than that. This is about banks winning at cost to us all, yet again...a thread to explain.
The claim being made is a relatively simple one, but technically it’s a bit complex. I’ll try to make this as clear as I can. It all revolves around quantitative easing, or QE.
QE has been used twice in UK history. The first time was after the financial crash in 2008. Between 2009 and 2013 just under £400 billion of QE was done. Another small chunk of QE was gone in 2016 because of the risks created by Brexit, bringing the total to that date to £445bn.
This form of QE had one real purpose, although the government never admitted it at the time. The intention was to put a lot more cash on the balance sheets of UK banks to prevent them going bust, as Lloyds, Royal Bank of Scotland, Northern Rock and others had done in 2008.
To do this the government did QE, which is a ridiculous process where the government issues new bonds (which are fixed term, fixed interest rate savings products by any other name, but which are quoted on stock exchanges so they can be bought and sold). It then buys them back.
The government issues these bonds to supposedly fund its deficits when it spends more than it gets in through taxes, although (like so much about the government) finances this claim is a lie.
The government need never borrow money to fund its spending because it has its own bank - the Bank of England - that can always lend the government the money it needs instead.
And if you wonder where the Bank of England might get the money from to fund this the answer is that it simply creates it. All it has to do is type two numbers into a computer.
One increases the government’s loan account with it by, say £10 billion. The other increases its current account with the Bank of England by the same amount. And that’s it. That’s how it makes new money.
There is nothing odd about this, by the way. That is literally how every single penny of new bank lending in the UK is funded. You never borrow someone else’s money when you tap your credit card on a card machine. New money is created by you and the bank every time you do that.
This is because all money is just debt, and all banks do is record the debts they owe to and from their customers. There is no money in a bank as such. There’s just a giant set of accounts that records money owing.
The twist is that they charge you for the privilege of owing them money you did as much to create as they did.
To get back to QE. Before 2008 banks trusted each other to pay the money they owed each at the end of each day as they settled up the accounts between themselves as they paid out or received money for the customers of other banks.
And then after 2008 the banks realised how terrible they all were, and how untrustworthy they’d become and stopped trusting each other and basically demanded that there was more cash in the inter-bank payment system.
The inter-bank payment system is called the central bank reserve accounts that each UK bank and some other regulated financial services companies are required to keep at the Bank of England. In 2008 there was only around £40 billion in these accounts. It was not enough.
The government was desperate to prevent any more banks failing. So it had to boost the amount on the central bank reserve accounts. It did that using QE. It bought back the government bonds I have already mentioned. It did it by using new money created by the Bank of England.
The Bank of England then put that money in the central bank reserve accounts of the commercial banks. As a result those banks then paid the people who previously owned those bonds that had been sold back to the government.
Importantly though remember there is nothing physical about money. It’s just debt. So, the banks paid out to their customers because the Bank of England promised to pay them, but that payment was not with the money the Bank of England provided.
Instead the commercial banks noted that the Bank of England (which is the only bank that can never fail, because ultimately it creates all money) had promised to pay them and so, in turn, they paid their customers.
But they don’t pay their customer the Bank of England’s money (or debt, which is what it is). Instead, the payment they make is actually a new record of debt from them to their customer, which they will make because they trust the promise from the Bank of England to pay them.
This is a long way around saying that the new money created by the Bank of England on the commercial bank’s central bank reserve accounts stayed in those accounts. Pretty much they went up by about the same amount as the amount of QE dent repurchases.
The commercial banks were saved with money the government gave them and on which it paid interest at the Bank of England base rate, which has always been 1% or less since 2009, and until recently was 0.1%. The cost was pretty small. No one worried about it.
Then came Covid. And so did QE, again. But this time the deal was quite different. The Bank of England created new money that was spent by the government to simply keep the economy going. £450 billion or so of it.
This was paid out through the commercial banks and the central bank reserve accounts went up again, by near enough this amount, to reach near enough £900 billion.
To pretend that this was not happening i.e., to provide cover for the fact that the Bank of England was really giving the government all the money it needed and no Covid spending was coming from tax or borrowing the government and Bank of England pretended to do more QE.
This whole QE operation in 2020/21 is best described as a sham, or a lie. Each week after the government pumped money into the economy the Treasury issued new debt to pretend borrowing was paying for these costs. And within days the Bank of England then bought this new debt back
So, the commercial banks or their customers were asked every week to buy debt, but they always knew that they would get their money back in days. That was the sham. This QE was put in place to pretend the national debt increased, but it did not.
From April 2020 to July 2021 99.5% of all new government debt was repurchased by the Bank of England to pretend new government debt was created when in reality none was.
nstead the Bank of England funded the Covid crisis. But the money it provided to the government had to get into the commercial banking system and that meant it was paid to those banks through their central bank reserve accounts, which grew as a result, to near enough £900bn.
Remember what these central bank reserve accounts really are. They are in effect bank deposit accounts that the commercial banks hold with the Bank of England. They are nothing more complicated than that.
Critically though, the money in them was not the savings of the commercial banks. It was simply gifted to them by the government. Nothing more or less than that. The commercial banks were given this £900 billion by the government.
And the government paid interest on the gift as well. That was no problem when the interest rate was 0.1%. The cost was under £1 billion a year. But now it’s 1%, and rising. So each year the government is now paying out £9 billion to the commercial banks.
The commercial banks have not earned this money. They are just being gifted it. And that cost is going to rise. Some bankers are demanding Bank of England interest rates rise to 4% or more. The annual gift to the banks might rise to more than £40 billion in that case.
So, at a time of austerity and because the government is letting the Bank of England raise interest rates (which is a wholly mistaken policy because that will just crush the economy when we’re already heading for recession) and the UK’s banks are cashing in, massively.
In effect, as people in this country go into deep poverty and debt the banks will have never made so much and all because the government literally gifted them £900 billion, much if to stop them going bust after 2008 and Brexit, and the rest because of Covid.
Money is not going to trickle up to those who deserve it least. It is going to flood in their direction. And although I’ve been saying this for some time, now people are beginning to notice. But, they have the wrong response.
They’re making technical arguments, saying that Sunak should have issued than commercial banks with long term, fixed-rate debts last year so limiting the amount of interest the banks could earn. Well, maybe, yes he should have done. But he didn’t, and hindsight is wonderful .
So what should he do now? There several things that could be done.
First, he could tell the Bank of England to cut interest rates. He needs to do so. These interest rate rises are going to cause recession in any case and will do nothing to stop inflation. But the Bank and conventional economists will yell and squeal and so he won’t do that.
Second, he could tell the Bank to only pay bank base rate on, say, £100 billion of the central bank reserve accounts and the rest he could say should still be paid at 0.1%. This is possible. After all, the commercial banks pay almost nothing on the deposit accounts they provide.
Or, he could do a windfall tax on the banks. This could be at 90% on the money they are paid on their central bank reserve account balances (or even 100%, as they never earned these sums). That would solve the problem.
Any of those three options solve this problem and would stop banks from profiting as most in this country face a financial crisis. Will he do any of them? That is the ultimate test for Sunak. The people, or the banks? That is his choice to make.
Time will tell, but I fear he will favour the banks. He will say he can't do a windfall tax at those rates. And he will say he can't overrule the Bank of England, who he will claim are independent, which is another complete sham as they aren't.
And he will say we need interest rate rises because people have to be published with a recession for the inflation they did not cause and which he is doing nothing to resolve.
But it need not be this way, and now you know why. Sunak can destroy the country by favouring the banks. But he need not do so. Please shout about that. ENDS.
POST SCRIPT: It's been suggested to me that Rishi Sunak can't overrule the Bank of England. He can. Section 19 of the Bank of England Act 1998 lets him do so at any time.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Richard Murphy

Richard Murphy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RichardJMurphy

Jun 12
Sundays are for ideas. So, here are a few to muse on when out in the sun ......
Tax belongs to governments. There's no such thing as taxpayer’s money. You pay tax because you owe it. Once you’ve paid it the money is no longer yours. It’s the government's. Just like when you’ve paid a shop the money is theirs. Don’t believe politicians who claim anything else
Money is just a record of debts owed to and from other people, most often banks. The only real proof of its existence is the number printed on your bank statement that records that debt. There is no ‘money in the bank’. There’s just a number on a bank statement.
Read 9 tweets
May 29
We know we have a government that lies. We know it is corrupt. And its big new idea is bringing back pounds and ounces, which few in the UK now understand. But the biggest failure is to pretend low-tax, small-state government is still possible. It isn’t. A thread….
Until methods to measure national income were created, largely as a consequence of central planning during World War 2, growth was not an issue in politics. And then, when the war was over it became everything: the one thing every politician had to deliver.
Tories delivered with indifference as to how the resulting wealth was distributed (by and large). Labour did so whilst worrying about inequality and access to services. But growth was the common goal.
Read 21 tweets
May 27
As I made clear yesterday, the package of measures introduced yesterday by Chancellor Rishi Sunak failed to address the inflation issues he needed to address at this moment. What I did not address was whether it was inflationary in itself.
There are suggestions being made, e.g. by Sky economist Ed Conway, that putting money in people’s pockets is inherently inflationary by giving people money. I have to suggest that this is to misunderstand the current situation and what these measures do.
Whilst it is true that the £400 paid to be paid to every household this year looks as if it will increase available disposable incomes in some cases, the simple fact is that the current fuel price inflation is not going to matched by handouts in any case.
Read 23 tweets
May 18
Ways to tackle inflation (a thread):
1) Cut the government tax and duty take on energy to the April 2021 level
2) Change the way electricity is priced so it’s based on the average cost of production from all sources, and is not based on gas generation alone
3) Cut interest rates
4)Rejoin the Customs Union and Single Market to seriously cut costs
5) Stop trade war in Ireland
6) Set road fuel caps by fixing total VAT and duty take to April 2021 levels

Then address the problems arising:

1) Increase benefits and pensions now
2) Increase the minimum wage
How to manage the costs of this:

1) Let the government run a deficit rather than force the people of this country into debt
2) Count the benefits of keeping people fit, warm, in their homes and in their jobs
3) Use QE if need be, as we did to pay for Covid
Read 5 tweets
May 14
I keep reading that we are going to suffer stagflation in the UK. That’s possible, I agree. I also think it’s unlikely. It’s just as likely that we might face deflation. But what we definitely need is a change of economic policy. A thread….
Stagflation assumes a continuing situation where wage growth exceeds growth in available goods and services on which income can be spent, pulling prices up.
There are some in the UK for whom this wage growth is happening. Let’s call them the wealthy. They can pay all the prices now being demanded for goods that are in short supply and subject to big price increases, from second-hand cars to heating for the swimming pool.
Read 60 tweets
May 6
The Bank of England's saying that UK inflation might rise to over 10% later this year, largely as a result of domestic energy price increases, but also road fuel and other costs. There is no way this is necessary. In this thread I explain why and what could be done to stop this…
Many of the costs of supplying energy in the UK are fixed. So, energy company costs of managing and running consumer’s accounts have not changed in this crisis. Nor have the costs of energy transmission changed much.
Come to that, there is no reason why the green levy on energy needs to rise. And actually, it’s bizarre that the government is collecting much more in tax, whether as VAT or other duties as a result of fuel price increases, which tax increases make inflation much worse.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!