So @beatmastermatt just put out this great video on #Georgism and #LandValueTax. If this was your first introduction to the theory, you might have some questions. I have answers.
Q. Can someone summarize Progress & Poverty for me so I don't have to read the whole thing?
A: YES --> gameofrent.com/content/progre…
Q. Does Land really matter anymore in the modern economy?
A: YES --> gameofrent.com/content/is-lan…
- Most Urban Real Estate value is Land
- LVT could raise 25-75% of current federal spending
- Land represents a massive share of major bank loans
- Land is the world's largest asset class
Q. Can Land Value Tax be passed on to tenants?
A: NO --> gameofrent.com/content/can-lv…
Empirical evidence from many studies all seem to indicate LVT gets factored into the price of housing and drives down both purchase price and rental price.
Q. Can Unimproved Land Value Tax be Accurately Assessed Separately from Buildings?
A: YES, PROBABLY --> gameofrent.com/content/can-la…
There are good modern methods out there, the trick is we need to push for more widespread adoption. I'm actively working on this field myself now.
Q. Is Georgism Politically Viable?
A: LET'S FIND OUT!
I like the bottom-up approach. Get one big city to do it and spread from there. Houston famously had a successful LVT back in the 1910's under J. J. Pastoriza, Houston's first Hispanic mayor:
Q. Should I buy digital real estate in the metaverse?
A: NO ---> gamedeveloper.com/design/land-va…
The metaverse is currently experiencing a digital land-based recession, with the results playing out more or less exactly as Henry George has predicted!
Q. Are Georgists hard-line purists unwilling to compromise?
A: I'm not at least!
I'm happy to make incremental progress. Full overnight LVT might not be in the cards. But you know what could be?
PROPERTY TAX REFORM.
A revenue-neutral property tax shift to land.
Under this policy, you collect the SAME amount of money you're currently collecting from property taxes. Raised X million in property taxes last year? Raise X million this year. But raise it ONLY from land. Pass a universal exemption for buildings.
So the LVT is well short of 100% of the full rental value of the land, but heck, I'll take it, major improvement on the status quo.
The majority of the tax burden will shift to vacant lots, parking lots, and underdeveloped properties downtown in the city center.
It delivers property tax relief to the majority of your citizens while improving incentives. It's a great place to start and is pragmatic and founded on solid principles.
Oh right one more:
Q: ZOMG! Will LVT DESTROY FARMERS???
A: NO
Land VALUE tax, not Land AREA tax. Rural and agricultural land is nowhere near as valuable as Urban land. The VAST majority of land value is concentrated in city centers!
Q: Will Land Value Tax literally solve every problem ever?
A: Of course not. But it will fix a LOT!
LVT (and other Georgist interventions) address ROOT problems in the economy rather than just symptoms.
I've been looking into the on-chain game Dark Forest with my business partner @Ant_Pecorella and it is genuinely fascinating and way more interesting than any other blockchain game I've investigated so far
@Ant_Pecorella Perhaps unsurprisingly, it has attracted very little interest from the money side of blockchain as its focused way more on interesting tech experiments than it is on financialization
@Ant_Pecorella Jury is still out about what our opinion is. But my basic standpoint is, if you're doing interesting experiments on proof-of-stake rather than proof-of-work, and you're not playing high stakes games with people's money, I have a lot fewer baseline objections.
So Breaking Points by @esaagar & @krystalball had a good monologue on Wall Street's incursions into the Housing Market. I'd like to supplement it with some facts about how big a deal real estate speculation really is. @PointsCommunity
Real Estate has massively taken over as a total share of bank loans over the last century. It was 68% in the USA in 2007, and has been steadily increasing for both the USA and most developed countries worldwide.
The Sandbox is a UGC blockchain game that is the leading light of "Virtual Real Estate Games." It has > $100M in investment, and as of last week, tokens valued at $14 billion. It also has barely any users. Investors are effectively valuing monthly active users at > $470,000 each
The Sandbox (TSB) says they had only 30,000 MAU's in November. Decentraland has 10 times that many (probably because Decentraland runs in a browser and doesn't require a crypto wallet to play as a guest).
Get this: **Second Life** has more *simultaneous* users than TSB has MAU's
Heck, Second Life -- whose hype cycle crashed way back in 2008 -- has more *MAU's* than TSB's entire total userbase.
If you enjoyed @naavik_co's deconstruction of Axie Infinity, settle in, as we share some tidbits from this month's take on The Sandbox
1) Pure P2E widely discredited, defenders of the idea evolve it to "Play AND Earn" (already happening)
2) Land-grab UGC games start to show cracks and play out according to Ricardo's Law of Rent
1/X
Specifically -- virtual landlords hoarding assets used to gatekeep publishing rights for user generated content and even charging rent for the right to access users will choke out incentives to build, hampering user growth and creative energy put into submissions
3) Blockchain game defenders will move their focus away from Pure P2E and UGC Land-grabs, dismissing them as "early efforts" and the real future is "true ownership of your assets" (already happening)
I have some incoherent thoughts that aren't gelled yet in response to the crypto-gaming enthusiast question, "Well why WOULDN'T gamers want to own their assets and be able to resell them, as opposed to the status quo where it's just lost money?"
Humor me a bit...
It started to click (but hasn't fully cohered yet) when I read this article, "The Gift of It's Your Problem Now" about tying Open Source to the social act of gift giving, and how it resists and even disintegrates sometimes if you try to formalize it
There's a point here somewhere and I'm trying to tease it out. I think what I'm NOT saying is "the commodity form corrupts everything" or whatever, but more about how the standard crypto-gaming lens misunderstands how normies understand the intersection of money and games
In my day job I analyze blockchain games, and the only ones so far I've found that deal in real money and are plausibly "sustainable" are the kind where most players should expect to regularly lose money
It's not possible to set up a system where every player should expect a net payout, and also have a sustainable ecosystem long term. You're just paying out current players from new players, and it breaks when growth stops.
In a sane economy, you produce some value, and people pay you for that value. So they lose money, but they gain something they value as much or more than that money. For instance, entertainment in the form of a game that is fun to play.