Why do mask mandates fail? Even with strict compliance and N95s? The video below (and the continuation in the next tweet) explain why.
The rest of this🧵summarizes why I believe those pushing for mask mandates are dishonest &/or willfully ignorant &/or mentally unwell.
1/31
If an N95-style respirator isn't perfectly sealed, it isn't capable of filtering an aerosolized respiratory pathogen.
The video below shows how "fit-testing" works.
Masks cannot filter aerosolized particles (see above) and an unsealed N95 respirator is merely a mask.
2/31
Exaggerating the capabilities of masks (or even N95 respirators) provides a *false sense of security*. Below, a certified industrial hygienist testifies about real-world limitations.
In the video clips below, spanning 2009 to 2020, infectious disease experts laugh at the idea of mask mandates or mask-wearing to prevent illness (alluding to crime, ineffectiveness, loss of dignity and annoyance).
Did "the science" change in April 2020? It did not.
4/31
The NEJM suggested that universal masking may not have a scientific nor logical basis, yet cited masks as "talismans" that may increase a "sense of safety, well-being, and trust." (A prelude to further arguments conflating perception with reality.)
Masks pose a risk of self-contamination after extended clinical use (> 6 hours), calling into question the wisdom of reusable masks. Furthermore, workers reported discomfort, headache, and breathing/communication issues during extended mask wearing: bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11…
8/31
The use of face masks resulted in "no significant reduction in influenza transmission" outside of a healthcare setting, according to the findings of a May 2020 CDC-published analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials that spanned 1946-2018.
A widely-cited June 2020 paper claiming that face masks were critical to prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was met with calls for retraction from scientists who called the paper "dangerously misleading," and lacking "any basis in evidence."
The trend of using anecdotes and observations to tout the ability of face masks to prevent the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 had continued throughout Summer 2020.
E.g. The hair salon story, published in CDC's non-peer reviewed MMWR.
11/31
A more rigorous study of mask efficacy was published in July 2021. It alluded to the failure of masks in the real-world, while giving credence to filtering efficacy in a lab setting. (Self-contamination and user discomfort/risk were not addressed).
By 2021, the CDC's non-peer reviewed MMWR was used to retroactively justify the agency's own recommendations by publishing studies that lacked controls or statistically-significant results. The CDC kept kids in masks; yet, data didn't support it.
A re-analysis of the CDC's Sept. 2021 MMWR failed to find a relationship between school-masking and pediatric Covid-19 cases. Additionally, a skeptical observer might infer that the original paper's conclusion was based on cherry-picked data.
By Feb. 2022, "experts" now claimed real-world mask efficacy that was greater than what was achieved under ideal lab conditions, citing a CDC self-reported phone survey that was "subject to at least eight limitations" with results that were "not statistically significant."
17/31
In Mar. 2022, an NIH-funded study claimed that schools with mandatory masking had approximately 72% fewer cases of school-based transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during the Delta surge.
This study may be the most poorly designed (or intellectually dishonest) that I've ever seen.
18/31
Meanwhile in Europe (where many kids were never forced to mask), a large scale, apples-to-apples study found no benefit from school mask mandates. The U.S. press neglected to report on it, opting to promote the flawed Duke study (see above).
On an individual basis, the odds of successful respirator use are slim, yet possible. This fact is evidenced by the data above. However, the failure of mask mandates, domestically and worldwide, is irrefutable.
E.g. Mask mandates failed on a statewide level.
20/31
E.g. Mask mandates failed at a university level.
Cornell's Covid-19 outbreak was not contained despite strict masking rules plus additional measures, including: vaccination, boosting, routine PCR testing, isolation orders, contact tracing, etc.
E.g. Mask mandates failed in Asian countries where surveys claiming +95% compliance could be viewed with less skepticism (considering the cultural normalcy of mask wearing, deference, and obedience to authority).
22/31
E.g. Mask mandates failed despite N95 requirements (see Germany). Mask mandates failed in one of the most sparsely-populated countries in the world, where resistance was met with violent force (see Australia).
23/31
E.g. Mask mandates, coupled with vaccine passports and other travel restrictions, failed to prevent one of the most catastrophic surges in Covid-19 deaths worldwide (see Hong Kong).
Masking everyone, all the time, doesn't spare the high-risk elderly who are unvaccinated.
24/31
In additional to being empirically and demonstrably ineffective, mask mandates often violate all four pillars of medical ethics. Autonomy and consent are revoked, beneficence is statistically improbable and maleficence (harms) are all-too real, especially in children.
25/31
Forcibly masking a child in diapers is a cruel and indefensible public policy that is unique to the U.S. (and one that was rigorously enforced in New York City). There are no benefits to this abuse, yet the physical/psychological/developmental harms are myriad.
26/31
Closing Thoughts #1
Political- and public-health leaders have been dishonest about masks and mandates since 2020. E.g. G7 attendees posing for a photo with N95 masks, then promptly removing them. A physician ordering masks only for a press conference. "Noble lies," etc.
27/31
Closing Thoughts #2
Some of the most tireless public-health voices in favor masking children and mandating masks forever also tirelessly promote misleading studies (see above), reject the idea of controlled studies, minimize or ignore collateral harms, block critics, etc.
28/31
Closing Thoughts #3
Mandates are correlated with violence. To force a person to wear a mask can be as psychologically traumatic as forcing a person to remove a mask.
Yet, those who wish to impose masks on others often appear to suffer from persecutory delusion.
29/31
Closing Thoughts #4
America is facing an unprecedented surge in addiction, depression, and suicidal thinking. Additionally, less obvious forms of mental illness exist and are "contagious" by way of the press, social media and public policy. Beware institutionalized abuse.
30/31
Closing Thoughts #5
Mandates are ineffective, medically unethical, and thus, unjustifiable. I believe that those who continue to advocate for mandates are undeserving of power, let alone extraordinary emergency powers, and are unfit for public service.
The claim that "there was no pandemic" is not as crazy as it might sound, at least as I see things now. Extraordinary things were written in Dec. 2020, and when taken together, these passages offer a very different view of why things went so wrong.
A short 🧵 that I hope will 👀
"This discovery adds to evidence that the virus was quietly spreading around the world before health officials and the public were aware...the virus's presence in U.S. communities likely didn't start with the first case identified case in January."
- NPR, Dec. 1, 2020
"We were intubating sick patients very early. Not for the patients’ benefit, but to control the epidemic." Doctors say a return to pre-pandemic ventilator practice is saving lives.
This clip is from the Disney Junior show, "Rise Up, Sing Out."
In my view, what is being depicted in this exchange is closer to psychological abuse than to social emotional learning. Consider the following points:
1/14
The show begins with one boy making an observation about skin color. Before the second boy has a chance to fully process his feelings, let alone respond, a third-party shouts "Hold it!"
"Did that comment make you feel uncomfortable?"
2/14
(Meddling aside, the presumption of another's feelings is not necessarily through an empathetic lens: projection works similarly.)
Look at how the timing of the media's hard push into non-stop victim/oppressor narratives corresponds with youth mental health and educational outcomes.
Skyrocketing depression. Falling test scores.
It's not just social media at play. Legacy media is functioning like an abuser.
The use of socio-manipulative behavior is a way to highjack and weaponize empathy, then direct it against oneself and others.
A person, sufficiently abused, may become a recruiter for, and a veritable extension of, an abuser.
To be sick with Covid-19 in early 2020, yet blissfully unaware of how severe it was...was to have a significantly higher chance of survival. See:
Diamond Princess (zero deaths under age 60)
vs.
Hyper-Vigilance in Cities and Hospitals
vs.
Extreme Negligence in Care Facilities
Looking at the total population of the Diamond Princess, the number of deaths attributed to Covid-19, the age of the deceased, and the date recorded...then, creating a pro-rata, say, the size of a large wedding, would the excess mortality have been noticeable, let alone shocking?
To be clear, I believe that Covid-19 had the fundamental ability to drive excess death on a population level (maybe Sweden in 2020 is the purest example of that). My point is how radically different early-2020 outcomes were based on access to information/care/etc. More ≠better.
Howdy, @ev_rat. On the subject of GAN renderings, there is an aspect of the story that is likely embarrassing to journalists, and thus, I haven't seen much written on the subject.
Some quoted "experts" are not who they purport to be.
1/7
In 2020, I found several mastheads/about-us pages that were rendered. E.g. These non-existent "people" were quoted in NY Magazine, Woman's Day, Business, Inverse, Reader's Digest, Lifehacker, The Simple Dollar, Score, Fatherly, Legal Zoom, Business News Daily and Cheapism.
2/7
I was particularly troubled to find so-called experts quoted with respect to parenting, mental health and Covid-19 related topics.
Of course, *someone* was actually the source of the quotes...but whom?
At the time, the practice seemed to be a tool of affiliate marketers.
3/7