John W. DeFeo Profile picture
Jun 12 32 tweets 18 min read
Why do mask mandates fail? Even with strict compliance and N95s? The video below (and the continuation in the next tweet) explain why.

The rest of this🧵summarizes why I believe those pushing for mask mandates are dishonest &/or willfully ignorant &/or mentally unwell.

1/31
If an N95-style respirator isn't perfectly sealed, it isn't capable of filtering an aerosolized respiratory pathogen.

The video below shows how "fit-testing" works.

Masks cannot filter aerosolized particles (see above) and an unsealed N95 respirator is merely a mask.

2/31
Exaggerating the capabilities of masks (or even N95 respirators) provides a *false sense of security*. Below, a certified industrial hygienist testifies about real-world limitations.

His claims are backed by controlled studies. E.g. - academic.oup.com/jid/advance-ar…

3/31
In the video clips below, spanning 2009 to 2020, infectious disease experts laugh at the idea of mask mandates or mask-wearing to prevent illness (alluding to crime, ineffectiveness, loss of dignity and annoyance).

Did "the science" change in April 2020? It did not.

4/31
The NEJM suggested that universal masking may not have a scientific nor logical basis, yet cited masks as "talismans" that may increase a "sense of safety, well-being, and trust." (A prelude to further arguments conflating perception with reality.)

nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…

5/31
Textile masks were often mocked as a superstitious relic of the past. On Apr. 2, 2020, The Washington Post dismissed them as "useless."

washingtonpost.com/history/2020/0…

Ironically, on the next day, Apr. 3, the Trump administration recommended them:

cnn.com/2020/04/03/pol…

6/31
If the filtration capability of an N95 is compromised by a gap the size of a human hair, then what of cloth masks?

A 2015 cluster randomized trial found that workers who wore cloth masks presented more illness than those who wore no mask at all:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…

7/31
Masks pose a risk of self-contamination after extended clinical use (> 6 hours), calling into question the wisdom of reusable masks. Furthermore, workers reported discomfort, headache, and breathing/communication issues during extended mask wearing: bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11…

8/31
The use of face masks resulted in "no significant reduction in influenza transmission" outside of a healthcare setting, according to the findings of a May 2020 CDC-published analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials that spanned 1946-2018.

wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26…

9/31
A widely-cited June 2020 paper claiming that face masks were critical to prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was met with calls for retraction from scientists who called the paper "dangerously misleading," and lacking "any basis in evidence."

metrics.stanford.edu/PNAS%20retract…

10/31
The trend of using anecdotes and observations to tout the ability of face masks to prevent the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 had continued throughout Summer 2020.

E.g. The hair salon story, published in CDC's non-peer reviewed MMWR.

11/31
A more rigorous study of mask efficacy was published in July 2021. It alluded to the failure of masks in the real-world, while giving credence to filtering efficacy in a lab setting. (Self-contamination and user discomfort/risk were not addressed).

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…

12/31
By 2021, the CDC's non-peer reviewed MMWR was used to retroactively justify the agency's own recommendations by publishing studies that lacked controls or statistically-significant results. The CDC kept kids in masks; yet, data didn't support it.

nymag.com/intelligencer/…

13/31
What followed in Sept. 2021 may be the most widely-cited study of the pandemic: "The Bangladesh mask study." I believe it was conducted in good faith.

The media rewrote the press release, yet seemingly-neutral academics questioned the study's risk reduction claim (~11%).

14/31
Later in Sept. 2021, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky broadcast that schools without mask mandates were 250% more likely to have a Covid-19 outbreak.

She cited a study that failed to account for which schools were open or closed for summer break.

theatlantic.com/science/archiv…

15/31
A re-analysis of the CDC's Sept. 2021 MMWR failed to find a relationship between school-masking and pediatric Covid-19 cases. Additionally, a skeptical observer might infer that the original paper's conclusion was based on cherry-picked data.

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

16/31
By Feb. 2022, "experts" now claimed real-world mask efficacy that was greater than what was achieved under ideal lab conditions, citing a CDC self-reported phone survey that was "subject to at least eight limitations" with results that were "not statistically significant."

17/31
In Mar. 2022, an NIH-funded study claimed that schools with mandatory masking had approximately 72% fewer cases of school-based transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during the Delta surge.

This study may be the most poorly designed (or intellectually dishonest) that I've ever seen.

18/31
Meanwhile in Europe (where many kids were never forced to mask), a large scale, apples-to-apples study found no benefit from school mask mandates. The U.S. press neglected to report on it, opting to promote the flawed Duke study (see above).

english.elpais.com/society/2022-0…

19/31
On an individual basis, the odds of successful respirator use are slim, yet possible. This fact is evidenced by the data above. However, the failure of mask mandates, domestically and worldwide, is irrefutable.

E.g. Mask mandates failed on a statewide level.

20/31
E.g. Mask mandates failed at a university level.

Cornell's Covid-19 outbreak was not contained despite strict masking rules plus additional measures, including: vaccination, boosting, routine PCR testing, isolation orders, contact tracing, etc.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35583871/

21/31
E.g. Mask mandates failed in Asian countries where surveys claiming +95% compliance could be viewed with less skepticism (considering the cultural normalcy of mask wearing, deference, and obedience to authority).

22/31
E.g. Mask mandates failed despite N95 requirements (see Germany). Mask mandates failed in one of the most sparsely-populated countries in the world, where resistance was met with violent force (see Australia).

23/31
E.g. Mask mandates, coupled with vaccine passports and other travel restrictions, failed to prevent one of the most catastrophic surges in Covid-19 deaths worldwide (see Hong Kong).

Masking everyone, all the time, doesn't spare the high-risk elderly who are unvaccinated.

24/31
In additional to being empirically and demonstrably ineffective, mask mandates often violate all four pillars of medical ethics. Autonomy and consent are revoked, beneficence is statistically improbable and maleficence (harms) are all-too real, especially in children.

25/31
Forcibly masking a child in diapers is a cruel and indefensible public policy that is unique to the U.S. (and one that was rigorously enforced in New York City). There are no benefits to this abuse, yet the physical/psychological/developmental harms are myriad.

26/31
Closing Thoughts #1

Political- and public-health leaders have been dishonest about masks and mandates since 2020. E.g. G7 attendees posing for a photo with N95 masks, then promptly removing them. A physician ordering masks only for a press conference. "Noble lies," etc.

27/31
Closing Thoughts #2

Some of the most tireless public-health voices in favor masking children and mandating masks forever also tirelessly promote misleading studies (see above), reject the idea of controlled studies, minimize or ignore collateral harms, block critics, etc.

28/31
Closing Thoughts #3

Mandates are correlated with violence. To force a person to wear a mask can be as psychologically traumatic as forcing a person to remove a mask.

Yet, those who wish to impose masks on others often appear to suffer from persecutory delusion.

29/31
Closing Thoughts #4

America is facing an unprecedented surge in addiction, depression, and suicidal thinking. Additionally, less obvious forms of mental illness exist and are "contagious" by way of the press, social media and public policy. Beware institutionalized abuse.

30/31
Closing Thoughts #5

Mandates are ineffective, medically unethical, and thus, unjustifiable. I believe that those who continue to advocate for mandates are undeserving of power, let alone extraordinary emergency powers, and are unfit for public service.

31/31

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John W. DeFeo

John W. DeFeo Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @johndefeo

May 10
Patently false: Mask mandates are refuted by empirical data worldwide. Meanwhile, mask policies spread harms (such as impaired speech and language development, body focused repetitive behaviors, social isolation, eczema and other allergic reactions, etc.).

1/6
To date, the most apples-to-apples large-sample-size school masking study took place in Spain. It found no benefit:

english.elpais.com/society/2022-0…

2/6
The use of face masks resulted in "no significant reduction in influenza transmission," according to the findings of a 2020 CDC-published analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials.

wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26…

3/6
Read 11 tweets
Apr 2
Today, a NY Supreme Court judge ruled that forced-masking of 2-4 year olds is "arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable." Rather than except the ruling (and reality), NYC mayor and his health commissioner have fought to CONTINUE this institutionalized abuse.

Credit: @Jusrangers
I asked the health commissioner to provide a single empirical study to support this recommendation. He decline to answer. I asked him how he reconciled this act despite it breaching all four pillars of medical ethics. He declined to answer. He did block me, however. Image
At today's press conference, NYC mayor and his health commissioner suggested that children, along with the elderly, are high risk groups. This is demonstrably false. The fatality rate for a 90 year old is, approximately, 7,000 times greater than the IFR for a 3-4 year old. Image
Read 10 tweets
Mar 29
I appreciate recent COVID-19 coverage from @nytimes and @washingtonpost. Nevertheless, corrections, clarifications, retractions and updates about previous COVID-19 reporting (and omissions) could fill each paper's A1-A20 section for a week.

Some non-exhaustive examples:

1/42 🧵
-Misappropriation of federal pandemic program funding

-Impact of mandates on (non-COVID) vaccination rates

-U.S. student enrollment gap during 2020/2021 period

-Safety concerns and violations at Wuhan CDC pre-COVID

-Racial discrimination resulting from vaccine passports

2/42
-Reasons for expired, unused antivirals and therapeutics

-Impact of mandates and lockdowns on youth mental health

-Historical perspective of deadly 2004 SARS-CoV lab leak

-Findings of Catalonia school mask study vs. U.S. studies

3/42
Read 42 tweets
Mar 28
The 1918 pandemic was unique in that it was the YOUNG who were disproportionately impacted. However, the notable feature of COVID-19 is that the ELDERLY are as much as 10,000x more likely to perish from the disease.

Public health bet the farm on the opposite of reality.

1/7 🧵
In Spring 2020, this paper was oft-cited as a justification to close schools, etc: jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/… - I'm willing to give many the benefit of the doubt for decisions made then, but it's time to revisit this for what it was: A bastardized, misapplied doctrine for CoV.

2/7
The 2007 paper cited above, that retroactively studied the 1918 pandemic, was by admission of the authors, an emerging view that was largely absent from existing pandemic planning. (Note how the CDC responded to the 2009 swine flu pandemic.)

3/7
Read 7 tweets
Mar 24
I've noticed a sharp drop in engagement recently, and while I acknowledge that many factors are likely at play, I'm discovering several tweets that are hidden by default via this warning: "Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content."

An example:
Indeed, it seems that Twitter is now flagging nearly 100% of my replies as "offensive content."

Here is another example:
Yet another tweet flagged as "offensive content."

In this case, I was hoping to give a medical doctor context about a study that he cited (the particulars of the data were not mentioned in the headline nor the summary).
Read 8 tweets
Mar 17
Who uses COVID-19 messaging that provokes fear (at the expense of highlighting critical facts, useful nuance and evidence-based reasons for hope)?

Here is my opinion, explained via 12 personas, arranged from most lamentable to most contemptible.

1/13 🧵
1. The Traumatized Professional

This doctor or scientist has suffered a personal loss and/or PTSD from working in a high stress, high risk environment. (It takes the utmost empathy and reasoning to question a brilliant survivor of trauma.)

2/13
2. The Good-Faith Huckster

This epidemiologist or biostatistician earned a certificate in public health despite having little- to no-background in science, medicine or ethics. He or she offers COVID-19 guidance in good faith, but lacks the experience to see possible harm.

3/13
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(