Speaking of reparative, we’re going to be seeking to define “reparative housing plan” for Black people in California as part of recommendations that go to the State Reparations Task Force.
The point I emphasize in every reparations convo on housing don’t just think a/b the cash: regulations can be far more widespread & quickly implemented.
As an example even if you gave every Blk person $250,000 for down payment on a house: in Crenshaw the homes now go for $1M. /2
To be clear we’ll take & need 💵…but even w/it Black n’hoods would remain inaccessible & vulnerable to displacement.
Tearing down barriers to stable Black housing & communities, combat housing discrimination, requires ADVANTAGING Blk ppl (above non-Blks) & over corporations. /3
So let’s talk eminent domaining all corporate homes & bldgs into Black-led community land trusts. @ecoylogy (h/t to POC leaders @hillside_villa)
Let’s talk Black right-of-refusal for homes.
Talk vacancy CONTROL & rent caps.
This isn’t even the half of what we’re cooking up /4
I say YIMBY won’t like it b/c it conflicts w/their Manifest Destiny ethos (they have the right to a home wherever they want & to remake whatever community they want), and requires shackling/weakening the perpetrators of this white supremacist capitalist housing market. /5
At its root it’s a/b power. Repairing the harm done to Blk ppl who endured chattel slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, restrictive covenants, steering, fwy construction, mass incarceration, divestment requires transferring power to Blk communities…Black self-determination. /6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Kate has been tweeting criticisms of YIMBY 4 the past few days highlighting that massive fraud w/a lot of the material thats been shared previously. Whats noticeable in the replies & QT beyond just the yt bro responses, is the glee they express in piling on. 🧵
You’ll get a familiar eye-roll from everyone who criticizes YIMBY here: be they quiet academics, housing justice activists, or the few courageous politicians. Folks accustomed to robust debate on public policy on the left will say it’s unlike anything they’ve ever experienced. /2
Folk get into knock-down drag out fights over school vouchers & charter schools. Yet even in that most heated issue, you won’t find ppl who universally say how toxic engagement on the issue online is.
So why on this?
Simply: the toxicity/the Proud Boys energy is a necessity. /3
And they balk when we point out they’re just the latest in a long history of racist land grabbers
“I’m not a colonizer! I just want to remake this occupied urban core of BIPOC to cater to me w/housing only folk like me can afford, & take homes of/price out/current residents.” /1
Colonialism, Trail of Tears, urban renewal & now YIMBYism. Each were/are violent interventions to remake/replace marginalized communities/ppl. The toxic energy #DensityBros exude online is a mere feature of a patriarchal white supremacist org & Manifest Destiny ethos.
/2
They believe that THEY have a right to an occupied city, & at best remain indifferent to the basic human needs of the much less privileged for housing and community (in the broad sense of the term) and at worst believe they must be violently removed. See the Boudin recall. /3
I always saw Cerritos as a working class API town (some folks who owned & worked the counter at the beauty shops, nail salons, liquor stores in SoCntralLA ironically).
Weird to any1 who has been here more than a min to lump these cities in same bag as Palos Verdes Estates. /2
This isn’t to say whether Chino Hills is doing enuf now (dunno & they probably arent)…but rather to say a lot of now expensive towns in SoCal are new towns never built to be an exclusionary white enclaves. Heck Chino Hills didn’t even get built out until the late ‘80s/‘90s…
/3
Expect a lot to be made of this. But it remains unfortunately simplistic (zoning in Malibu has nothing to do with educational outcomes in South Central), & misses the opportunity to provide a racial impact frame in the context of the current housing market & policy discussion. /1
What has occurred (& regrettably (through my very quick skim of the report) is @oandbinstitute has fallen in the trap of focusing on exclusionary zoning & not exclusionary communities. This framing is the product of loads of RE industry $$$/YIMBY to reshape the housing debate. /2
The @oandbinstitute report is also regrettably silent on the racial and economic impacts of reforming zoning in marginalized communities that is pretty well shown to exacerbate current inequalities. #ZonedOut is over a 5 years old. /3
So lets talk a/b the complexities of "buy the block" & its liberal application and invocation of Nipsey Hussle's name, especially when claiming such is "anti-gentrification" or what Nipsey was doing.
This article has been making the rounds. A thread. /1
First a point: Black ownership does not equal anti-gentrification. Two tenant clinics per month are operated out of @CrenshawSubway's @TheUmojaCenter most of the complaints tenants make r against mom-and-pop landlords. This is a not so quiet secret out there. /2
@CrenshawSubway@TheUmojaCenter I know hella Blk landlords who specifically claim they charge market-rate rents 4 apts they inherited free-and-clear, or paid a fraction of the cost 4. They r enjoyin a certain lifestyle profiting (in some cases mightily) off someone else. Nothing special or unique a/b them. /3
Sum talk a/b Wall Street investors but is his proposed solution strong enuf?
Also, he’s unfortunately in the blanket upzoning camp so w/flipper tax isn’t that 1 step fwd but 2 steps back?
.#BernieSanders2020 calls for natl rent control & that will definitely curb some speculation, but it is without vacancy control. See Oakland, San Francisco, Berkeley & Santa Monica for the effects of strong rent control without vacancy control.