To follow up on @douglewinenergy's tweet about @ERCOT_ISO chronically underestimating demand, let's talk about ERCOT's predictions for this summer.

A 🧵:
ERCOT predicted seasonal maximum power (SMP, the hour of highest demand during a season) during June-July-August (JJA) of 77.3 GW. They predict an "extreme" max demand of 81.6 GW.

You can see details of ERCOT's forecast here: ercot.com/files/docs/202… Image
Of particular importance, ERCOT's forecasts are based only on historical temperatures, which we know are not good indicators of the future. Image
My student Jangho Lee and I have developed power forecasts that use climate models to incorporate the impact of climate change, as well as allow us to take a more statistical view of the future. Here is the probability distribution of JJA 2022 seasonal maximum power (SMP). Image
Our median estimate is (78.4 GW) is very close to ERCOT's base case (77.3 GW).

We predict that their "extreme" scenario (81.6 GW) is slightly below our 90th percentile, so we should expect to exceed that about every decade or so.
Note that ERCOT does not provide any probability for their "extreme" scenario, but in a conversation with one of their analysts, he agreed that their "extreme" scenario was about a 90th-percentile event.
We can argue about what an "extreme" scenario is, but you cannot argue that ERCOT has failed to tell people what their "extreme" scenario represents. This seems to be a pretty big oversight on ERCOT's part and it's hard not to speculate on why they do that.
In a 1-in-20 year event, demand could reach 83.7 GW and in a 1-in-100 year event (like winter storm Uri), demand could reach 86.4 GW.

The good news is that ERCOT estimates total available power is 91.4 GW. So if all generators produce as expected, there should be enough power.
But, of course, "as expected" does not always occur on the ERCOT grid. Their worst-case scenario for unplanned thermal outages (coal, gas, nuclear) is 13.7 GW and their worst-case scenario for underproduction of renewable power is 9.1 GW.
A loss of 22.8 GW would cause blackouts even on the median SMP. Less severe loss of generation could easily cause blackouts during a 1-in-10 year SMP.

And loss of thermal power seems to be happening more and more frequently.
If you look critically at the numbers, you cannot help but feel that our grid is on the ragged edge. It seems like ERCOT should do a better job explaining to people the situation rather than try to tell people that everything is fine.
To do that, though, ERCOT needs to incorporate climate change into their forecasts. @TexasObserver
texasobserver.org/texas-insane-h… Image
This also underscores the fact that there is NO MARGIN for error on the ERCOT grid. If things go even slightly wrong on the grid, Texans are going to be without air conditioning. We need to ask ourselves if that's the world we want to live in.
Our forecast methodology is described here: Lee & Dessler, The impact of neglecting climate change and variability on ERCOT’s forecasts of electricity demand in Texas, Weather, Climate, and Society, 14, doi:10.1175/WCAS-D-21-0140.1, 2022.
Reprint: drive.google.com/file/d/10jVEDb…
The forecast above uses temperatures come from the NCAR CESM-LE between 2016-2025; non-climate factors (P_ref) are extrapolated to 2022 from historical data (Fig. 2b of the paper).
Explainer video of the methodology:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Dessler

Andrew Dessler Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AndrewDessler

Jun 8
Are you tired of 💩 arguments that "renewables are more expensive because they're unreliable" or "you have to pay for backup when you install renewables". Let me explain why renewables lower the cost of energy & don't require additional backup.
Imagine a grid that runs 100% on coal. Some of the generators are baseload, which run all the time. Other generators are load followers, meaning that they ramp up and down through the day as demand varies (e.g., people turn their air conditioners on in the early afternoon).
Let's imagine that you add wind to the grid capable of generating as much as 10% of your electricity. Wind is cheaper than coal, so when the wind turbines are generating power, the load-following coal plants ramp down. When the wind subsides, the load followers ramp back up.
Read 13 tweets
May 27
Hey @AlexEpstein: I assume you're collecting errors from your new book so you can issue corrections and fix them in a future printing. Here's one you definitely need to correct. This plot is totally wrong: Image
I see that you used numbers from a New York Times article, which was reporting testimony Hansen gave to Congress. You can read his testimony and it's clear that the article totally butchered it. Here's what he actually said:
To be clear, Hansen said that Northern Hemisphere mid-latitude temperatures in 1990-2000 would be 0.5-1°C above the late 1950s. Temperatures in 2010-2020 would be 1-2°C higher than the late 1950s.
Read 13 tweets
May 10
Why aren't car companies selling more electric cars? It seems they don't want to. That's my experience, at least.
I'm looking for a plug-in hybrid. I went to @Ford to look at the Escape and no dealers have any inventory and (according to the dealer) Ford is not even taking orders. Maybe, he tells me, I can get one next year.
I know that there are supply chain issues. But this is not a new problem. In 2013, it took me months to find a @GM Chevy Volt.
Read 5 tweets
May 5
Is it just me or does anyone else feel like we're simultaneously living through multiple dystopian cli-fi novels.

Ministry for the Future
nytimes.com/2022/04/28/wor…
Read 5 tweets
Apr 30
A college education is a public good, so I'm in favor of some type of student loan forgiveness. But I think we also need to also tackle why tuition is so high in the first place.

In fact, many of the problems of higher education flow directly from extremely high tuition.
I can't tell you how many @TAMU students I've had that are working several jobs in order to afford tuition. And @TAMU is very very affordable. These students are stressed and burned out and I can see that it affects how they do in class.
As far as I can tell, no one can explain why tuition is so expensive. Possible explanations: the proliferation of administrators, declining State support, rising faculty salaries, improvements in the campus to attract students, ... the list goes on.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(