It's odd to see royalists commenting on Andrew's sense of entitlement, as if entitlement isn't the bedrock of monarchy. As a group the royals feel a deep sense of entitlement: entitled to a unique family claim to the job of head of state and head of the state church; a claim to
thousands of hectares of land that rightly belongs in public hands; exemptions from whatever law they choose to exempt themselves from, including race discrimination and environmental protection laws; titles and honours awarded to them for no reason other than the family they
belong to and their status within it; medals, ranks and uniforms from all branches of the armed forces despite their own military careers being either quite short or non-existent; hundreds of millions of pounds every year to spend as they choose on running their household;
dozens of staff, including people who help them dress in the morning; the use of private jets and helicopters for routine domestic travel even while lecturing everyone to reduce their carbon footprints; privileged and preferential treatment by the police when reported for alleged
crimes ranging from sexual offences to criminal damage to cash-for-honours; direct and secretive access to government ministers and the freedom to lobby government on any issue they wish; direct access to all government papers which allows them to intervene in official decision
making before the public, press or opposition even know what's being discussed; dispensation for any offensive comments made in public; deference and sycophancy from everyone they meet; the use of Crown Estate property
as if it were their own; exemption from freedom of information laws, preventing scrutiny of what they're doing behind closed doors; and much more. In short, they believe they are entitled to pretty much whatever they want, when they want it and on their terms. #AbolishTheMonarchy
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So, people have inevitably started talking about the economic benefit of the monarchy. Because when it's obvious the shine is coming off and people are losing interest, why not revert to talking about money? Here's why that claim about the profitable monarchy is nonsense. 🧵
The monarchy costs the taxpayer at least £345m a year. Compare that to similar but elected heads of state, such as in Ireland, and you can see that's very, very expensive. The budget for the Irish president is around £4m a year. republic.org.uk/the_true_cost_…
The Crown Estate belongs to the Crown, ie the state. It's income will not be lost when we get rid of the monarchy. It is not and never was the private property of the Windsor family. That means we can't count its income as a benefit of the monarchy.
The Palace of Versailles hasn't been the home of royals since 1789. France hasn't had a monarch since 1870. With nearly 10 million visitors every year, Versailles is one of the most visited historic sites in the world. Paris attracts over 30m visitors a year (similar to London).
Buckingham Palace and Kensington Palace each attract around half a million visitors a year. Windsor Castle around 1.6m. The Tower of London just under 3m.
Of the 100 top tourist destinations in the UK, Buckingham Palace comes in at number 67. Kensington Palace at 76. Windsor Castle does a bit better, at 22. Chester Zoo, Stonehenge, Windsor Legoland, and Edinburgh Castle all rank higher.*
When we tweeted pictures of the 18 royals, quite a few people had no idea who some of them were. Not surprising, as they don't make much of an appearance these days. But they still get significant subsidies from the state, including security and palatial apartments.
This is Richard, (Duke of Gloucester), a cousin of the Queen (son of the last king's brother), and his wife, Birgitte van Deurs (Duchess of Gloucester). The official royal website describes them as "full-time working members of the Royal Family."
In 2019 the Duke of Gloucester's engagements added up to about six weeks of full time 'work' for the whole year. Despite having never served in the armed forces, he dresses up in various uniforms. The couple have a palatial home in Kensington Palace.
Of course our campaign is about the British monarchy. But it's worth reflecting on monarchs around the world, whose legitimacy is bolstered by our own. A thread. arabnews.com/node/1261591/s…
This is King Vajiralongkorn of Thailand. He is vicious and corrupt. In a country that still has around 6% living in poverty he has amassed a personal fortune estimated between $30 and $70bn. bbc.co.uk/news/world-asi…
He has collaborated with military leaders, who staged a coup shortly before his accession to the throne. He spends a lot of his time in Germany, rather than in Thailand, including during the Covid pandemic. dw.com/en/thailands-k…
Hopefully the Queen will make a full recovery, however being a hereditary monarch makes her health relevant to our constitution. There is legitimate speculation that her health is worse that is being reported, with concerns that she may die within the next 12 months.
When that happens Republic will make a statement but will not be campaigning before the funeral. We will pay close attention to public debates and contribute where appropriate and we'll continue to speak up for the right of people to dissent.
That said, we are aware that Charles plans to 'campaign' from the first full day after his mother's death, by touring the country to consolidate his position and get people used to him as monarch as quickly as possible.