#indoorair2022. Tunga Salthammer. Plenary.
WARNING: "If you don't have a strong background with music and hard rock music this talk will be challenging." 1/
Guidelines and reference values are very different. Guidelines can be the result of health effect, or hygine. Health effect guidelines can be cancerous or non-cancerous. Reference values are the results of statistical analysis of large population data sets. 2/
Tunga highlighted the @isiaq STC 34 guidelines website. ieqguidelines.org/map.html. National guidelines can vary by three orders of magnitude. Found 43 guidelines for formaldehyde that varied 10-10,000 ug/m3. 3/
One problem is everyone has the right to define guidelines. Example Germany has guidelines for alpha-pinene is from 5 ug/m3 and the highest value is 2 mg/m3. These guidelines do not include reaction products. 4/
German guidelines: Guideline value I (GVI): no evidence of any health effect. Guideline value II (GVII): effect known, might want to run out. BUT then there is a big grey area in between those values. Each guide value has its own paper. 5/
Tunga highlighted his leading work (he is always five years ahead of everyone) with Tobias Schripp on vaping demonstrating large emissions of the solvent propylene glycol. 6/
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111…
Germany quickly estimated exposure concentrations from passive vaping (160-395 ug/m3). Resulted in guide values of GVI of 0.06 mg/m3 to GVII 0.6 mg/m3.

Far exceeded by hard rock player who steps into propylene glycol cloud 30 times per concert. 7/ Image
CO2 and TVOC values are hygiene based guidelines. But how you measure TVOC measurements are widely varied all giving different TVOC values (my comment, there is no health impact of TVOC). You must define measurement technique when defining guideline. 8/
"Having good air quality in schools is EASY." Just measure CO2 and make corrections and you can solve 95% of school IAQ problems. 9/
New WHO guidelines from 2021 are also applicable to the indoor environment. 10/ Image
There are problems with guidelines . e.g. formaldehyde. Guidelines range from 9-100 ppb (higher value is WHO). But real world can have elevated concentrations as high as 50-150 ppb OUTDOORs. /11
Tunga strongly supports guidelines. But "Is the lowest guideline always the best guideline." or "Does the benefit always justify the effort?" Cost increase exponentially, while benefits flatten or decrease (other compounds may impact benefit). /12 Image
"Everyone cares about formaldehyde. No one cares about radon." Both cause cancer.

If you publish guideline value you need to define the conditions which it can be applied (long term, short term, measurement technique, etc.) 13/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dustin Poppendieck

Dustin Poppendieck Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Poppendieck

Jun 16
#IndoorAir2022. Toby Carter. How do ozone and hydrogen peroxide interact with surfaces and impact IAQ? Oxidants deposit on surfaces and can release secondary VOCs. Secondary emissions are a function of deposition velocity, reaction yield, oxidant concentration and volume. 1/3
Room relevant material surface to volume ratios are important (very different for offices and bedrooms). Most deposition for ozone was on plastic/paint/skin/soft fabrics. 2/3
Hydroxyl radical concentration vary with time of day and space (highest in kitchen). Concentrations of formaldehyde and decanal increased when modeled people were introduced as a result of hydrogen peroxide and ozone reactions. 3/3
Read 4 tweets
Jun 16
#IndoorAir2022. @licinadusan. Plenary. Can we feel as good indoors and out? Can our buildings predictively respond to outdoor changes? Can our indoor environments not impact the ecological health of the planet? 1/14
Green certified buildings attempt to achieve these goals. hundreds of certifications globally. Certification schemes started during 1970s energy crisis (BREEAM). Existing certifications focus on building energy, less emphasis on occupants, IEQ and much less on human health.2/14
We consume huge amounts of energy on non-certified buildings and have poor occupant satisfaction (highest complaint is noise). Certification improve, but don't solve occupant satisfaction issues. Improvements still don't reach expected satisfaction of other industries. 3/14
Read 14 tweets
Jun 15
#IndoorAir2022. Michael Scholand, Piet Jacobs. Is cooking with natural gas a public health risk? "This is like living with a tailpipe in your kitchen". Gas stoves emit NO2, CO, ultrafine particles. 1/
European effort to get data to support EU/UK actions. Emulating @RockyMtnInst study. What happens if you increase hydrogen content of gas to IAQ? "You can't regulate something if you can't measure it." 2/
Phase 2 is a field campaign in winter 22-23 in EU kitchens with gas and electric stoves. What component of IAQ is gas/versus cooking? 3/
Read 4 tweets
Jun 15
#IndoorAir2022. Plenary Discussions. @CathNoakes, Giorgio Buonanno, Arsen Melikov. Lidia Morawska. Does Monkey Pox have airborne transmission? @CathNoakes "Quite Uncertain" But potential. 1) Before pox show, with fever. Not much data. 2) Lesions. Evidence of mouth lesions.1/6
3) skin flakes could transmit in places like bedding. Potential for airborne transmission (especially from lesions), but may not be a major route. But ventilation and airborne transmission guidelines should be followed in hospitals. 2/6
Lidia: "once it (monkey pox) is in the respiratory fluid there is no limit on what is going to happen." Giorgio: paper on classroom ventilation was important as it communicated to the epi world by using epi language from data engineering studies. 3/6
Read 6 tweets
Jun 15
#IndoorAir2022. Arsen Melikov. Plenary. Increasing ventilation rates is expensive, requires energy. Air cleaning also use energy and placement can impact performance. CFD modeling shows variability in ventilation type impacts Infection probability by up to factor of 7. 1/
Personal ventilation is best, supply air as close to breathing activities as possible, e.g. air curtains. Should consider occupant activities when making recommendations. 2/ Image
Source control via ventilation. Clean air at mouth. 3/ Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 15
#indoorair2022. Giorgio Buonanno. Plenary. In 2020, airborne modeling tools "came out like mushrooms". Most all tools used Wells-Riley and box models and assumed accurate input parameters. 1/4
Quantum = dose of airborne particles required to cause infection in 63% of individuals. Experimental validation demonstrated that volume of particle emission is main contributor to uncertainty. 2/4
Retrospective study in Italy of >10,000 classrooms. Classrooms with ventilation 1.4-10 L/s/person and >10 L/s/p. Risk reduction was 80% in higher ventilated classroom. 3/4 Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(