🔥EXPLOSIVE thread on #TaxiGate@GoldsmithsUoL: An FOI request has revealed that Goldsmiths warden @FCorner has spent nearly £20k 😲 of College money on taxis since she took up her post in August 2019. 1/14
2/ The reply to the FOI request begins by ‘apologis[ing] for the delay in responding’. The scandalous content of what is revealed probably explains why there was so much dithering. #CornersCabs
3/ The FOI reply covers 3 academic years 2018-21. During 2018-19, the previous warden, Pat Loughrey, was in post. For part of 2019-20, we were in lockdown. During 2020-21, staff worked from home. So how did @FCorner manage to rake up such obscene taxi bills?
4/ Amount spent on taxis:
2018-19: £446.38 (previous warden).
2019-20: £10,428.61 (of which £1,995.90 was disclosed as a taxable benefit to the Warden)
2020-21: £8,683.14 (of which £7,079.81 was disclosed as a taxable benefit to the Warden)
5/ Taxis for College business are tax exempt. Where the cost is noted as a “taxable benefit” that means that @GoldsmithsUoL has paid for the taxi for the warden’s personal use. The previous warden, Pat Loughrey, spent £0 on such taxis in 2018-19.
6/ Average cost of taxi use over the year:
2018-19: £8.58 per week (previous warden).
2019-20: £200.55 per week (@FCorner)
2020-21: £166.98 per week (@FCorner)
7/ The amount paid in taxis for College business by @FCorner (i.e. total minus the “taxable benefit” amount) shows that, in 2019-20, she spent £7986.33 MORE than the previous warden and £1156.95 MORE in 2020-21.
8/ The reply justifies #CornersCabs as: “The responses for 2020-21 include travel during a critical period of the Covid-19 pandemic. At this time it was essential for the Warden to be able to travel more safely to and from campus in order to provide leadership for the College.”
9/ In 2020-21, there was very little activity on campus due to Covid! Was the warden really coming into College to sit on her own in the ivory towers and hold zoom meetings? Even when restrictions were eased, she told us that she was abiding by govt advice and working from home!
10/ During the pandemic, some security guards and cleaners were still expected to come into College. The health & wellbeing of these essential workers is of no less importance than the warden’s, but they weren’t offered the luxury of private taxis paid for by @GoldsmithsUoL.
11/ We might expect financial decisions like this to be made for the CEO of a private company. But @GoldsmithsUoL is a PUBLIC institution. This is either public money or student fees being funnelled into funding a luxury lifestyle, all signed off by Dinah Caine, Chair of Council
12/ This info only came to light after a FOI request, but @FCorner promised us “radical transparency”! What other reckless financial decisions have been made? Where is the accountability? Council is dominated by private business interests. This must stop. #DemocratiseGoldsmiths
13/ As well as the hypocrisy of being so profligate while claiming the College is in financial crisis, how does this decadent use of taxis square with @FCorner’s supposed eco-friendly credentials? Taxis are hardly an eco-friendly way to travel, especially if travelling alone.
14/ While we’re at it, what’s with the sudden appearance of all the Bentleys on campus? These cars may be very posh but they are massive gas guzzlers. Anything to do with you Frances Corner?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
STATEMENT ON REDUNDANCIES 🔥
Revealed: the true brutality of @FCorner's Tory-inspired wrecking ball and how we are fighting back to defend the integrity of @GoldsmithsUoL. Link to our full statement (some highlights below). goldsmithsucu.org/2022/04/29/guc… 🧵1/20
2/The way that stage 3 of the redundancy process has been carried out is in violation of the College’s own policy on managing organisational change.
3/Just prior to the announcement of the cuts at 7.08pm on a Fri evening, on Tues 5 April the college proudly announced the appointment of 6 new senior posts in the new centralised Professional Services (PS) structure, and have since begun sacking PS staff on pay grades 4 & 5.
@GoldsmithsUoL Warden @FCorner today wrote to all staff to ask them to vote against industrial action. The email contained many misleading statements, which we address here. Tl;dr: SMT is set on its plan of unnecessary and damaging mass job cuts. Vote YES to stop them. 1/8
Management’s plan is for up to 52 staff to be issued redundancy letters before the end of the year, yet here the Warden admits the most recent accounts will not be published until *after* some staff are dismissed. Are these cuts really required due to College finances, or... 2/8
..are they the latest stage of @FCorner’s efforts, since she was appointed in 2019, to centralise control + “streamline” @GoldsmithsUoL? Contrary to what she claims, our Warden announced huge cuts *before” the pandemic hit. Her first plan (“Evolving Goldsmiths”) was defeated..3/8
BREAKING: We now know the full picture on redundancies planned by @GoldsmithsUoL - at least 52 jobs. Alongside 32 professional services staff, SMT today served notice they are seeking to cut the equivalent of 20 full time lecturers in English & Creative Writing and History. 1/4
There will likely be more job cuts to follow. We learned in yesterday's redundancy "consultation launch" (from which some of our reps were ejected) there will be a further three waves ("tranches") of "restructuring" professional services. 2/4
And the scale of the savings SMT seeks means more academic job cuts are very likely. 52 jobs lost at a small institution is huge. Workload would increase, courses would close, student experience would suffer. 3/4
🤣@GoldsmithsUoL SMT's PR team has devoted 400 words in the latest "Recovery Briefing" rebutting our tweets... and the main clarification they wish to make is that the now infamous "Managing Resistance to Change" presentation was not shared by accident, but on purpose! 🤣😂1/4
And in case you missed it, here's the presentation management is so eager to stress they fully intended to share with colleagues
In any case, colleagues were indeed "directed to an intranet page containing a presentation meant for managers" - members (who were not managers) were able to access the materials, which were later removed (or perhaps placed in a special folder only accessible to managers). 3/4
Ever wondered how management sees you? Well, our SMT (which is trying to axe ~80-100 jobs) recently gave a fascinating insight into its thinking. 125 staff told they're at risk of redundancy were directed to an intranet page containing a presentation meant for managers. Oops! 1/4
Resistance to "change" (it's actually mass layoffs we resist, not "change" itself) is presented as some kind of individual psychological defect (a "threat response") rather than a collective, principled, political opposition to injustice. 2/4
I think management is talking about us here?🤔Yes, as long as SMT is intent on mass redundancies, we will continue to "actively resist" rather than "change behaviour" 🙄3/4
We oppose @GoldsmithsUoL SMT’s planned handover of key financial decisions to the banks and the £4m of job cuts that will follow #StopTheSellOut 1/9
SMT is negotiating a £5-7m overdraft (“revolving credit facility”) with the banks, brokered by corporate accountants and consultants #StopTheSellOut 2/9
The deal would involve @GoldsmithsUoL putting up millions of pounds of its property as collateral, and allowing these private bodies to dictate terms to a public institution #StopTheSellOut 3/9