This morning at #UoELTConf22, @robzker asks why, after introducing more compassionate policies around assessment during the pandemic, we would go back to less compassionate policy. How can we tackle uncaring practices and reimagine a more compassionate education?
This is interesting - can cynicism about institutions come from a place of caring? @robzker questions punishment as strength and compassion as weakness. Why should we never do "hand-holding"? Does caring have to be tough love? (my phrasing). #UoELTConf22
Why do we even need to argue about this, what brought us to this place? Where can we go from here? Great provocations, thanks @robzker#UoELTConf22
Now on ethics with @nicolvision & @HoneybHighton. Ambiguity in policy around ethics could be exploited or lead to paralysis. Using moral fables and fairytales to help us understand ethics - fairytales as making us think through ambiguity. OK, I'm intrigued... #UoELTConf22
Who's in charge of the stories being told? Who are the actors, from whose perspective are they seen? Who should be involved in ethical evaluations & decisions?
A theme is that ethics aren't "set in stone" & characters are multifaceted.
Tensions between different values in different areas of practice (e.g. openness and security). Assumptions about motivations of others can be barriers to productive discussion and collaboration. There's not always a right answer.
Where is the place to discuss (and continually re-evaluate) the ethics of our rapidly-changing tech landscape? Where is the space for developing informed partnerships that drawn on diverse elements of expertise?
How to hold onto the big picture and not being too distracted by particular details. This needs to be informed by "compassion and nuanced thinking" @HoneybHighton
Is wider agreement about ethics realistic in complex situations? (my Q)
- Ethics of company vs ethics of particular implementations of particular technology
- Things change all the time so we can never stop thinking about ethics. @nicolvision #UoELTConf22
- worries about antagonistic relations with companies - we need openness and trust @HoneybHighton
- distributed responsibility ("we are the university") @nicolvision #UoELTConf22
Next, looking forward to @claraoshea on "The Course Cup: Playfully motivating and engaging students in assessment and feedback practices" at 2:15. #UoELTConf22
Clara talking about multiple ways of becoming (e.g. a doctor but also an academic learner). Multiple and dynamic motivations and purposes. @claraoshea#UoELTConf22
Clara asks, how do students know *how* they're becoming. Societal roles & goal identities as ever-changing. So judging quality of learning is dynamic. Iterative. Eating chocolate isn’t enough! We need to look at factories, cocoa growing processes, etc. @claraoshea#UoELTConf22
Technology isn’t neutral - how are tech and pedagogy related? How do values and beliefs influence what happens? How does tech mediate assessment and feedback processes? Need to examine specific practices & their implications @claraoshea#UoELTConf22
Gamification as "chocolate-covered broccoli". (Clara says make the broccoli delicious rather than hiding it).
But there are principles from games that can be integrated into assessment design (e.g. allowance for trial and error)
How to make space for challenges to be fun, individually motivating but communal, richly generative of feedback. "Fishbowl feedback" as an example where others can learn vicariously from one student's feedback. "Everyone wins together" attitude @claraoshea#UoELTConf22
There was more but I got too involved in the in-session chat! Great session about a great "games-based learning" course. @claraoshea#UoELTConf22
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On the last day of #UoELTConf22, I'll be chairing Neil Speirs and colleagues on "A quiet, unnoticed form of gentle solidarity" and @sbayne on "The ‘mode 3’ university: Is this our future?" Looking forward to it!
Neil plays confronting video of Edinburgh student stories of exclusion, isolation, loneliness, patronisation, bullying, inferiority complex due to social class. Gathered over 20 years but could still be told today. Accents, wealth, privilege, elitism. #UoELTConf22
Classism involves ongoing sustaining of barriers to access of resources for some, and the easing of access for others. Does university teaching still presuppose and reinforce the privileged upbringing of middle and upper classes? #UoELTConf22
The #UoELTConf22 begins! Looking forward to a rich 3 days of all things learning and teaching.
First @colmharmon welcomes us with a reminder that we can put longitudinal development at the core of ideas of the university. #UoELTConf22
Next @cathybovill talks co-creation with students. It takes "freedom with discipline". Staff don't need to lose their expertise for students to be meaningful partners. #UoELTConf22
Thinking of technology as entangled rather than as “first” or “last” is important for understanding the ethics of its use and the distributed knowledge required for ethical decision-making. 🧵
Ethics isn’t tied to particular technologies because tech is situated. Each tech is always combined with others. E.g. VLE’s, learning analytics, Turnitin, WhatsApp, email & Google’s search engine are often used in combination. Combinations matters more than individual components.
Each student’s combination is different, shaped not only by the teaching methods, assessment, culture and policy of teachers and institution, but also what the student is used to, their studying conditions, and what their peers are doing.
It can be hard to get students to buy into asynchronous work as much as they buy into synchronous events. I think this has to do with clarity around expectations and rationales.
We have long-standing teacher-centred cultures in HE. It's been lectures, tutorials, homework, assignments & exams.
Now, when we say: please discuss these problems or provocations asynchronously with the class, how do students see it? Is it homework, rather than the main event?
I think it depends on the course culture which, if we don't work hard on shaping, will probably look like that default teacher-centered culture I just described.
Some reasons why it doesn’t make sense to not say that online learning isn’t as good. 🧵
1. Online learning isn’t a method (e.g. recorded lectures or videoconferenced tutorials) and it isn’t a technology (e.g. discussion boards or Zoom). It’s a potentially infinite set of possibilities that *sometimes* involve online communication.
2. The thing that online learning is being compared with isn’t a specific thing either. It’s a potentially infinite set of possibilities that *sometimes* involve people being in the same room at the same time and/or accessing shared physical resources and infrastructure.
We keep looking for big lessons from pandemic remote teaching. I think we should be talking about small lessons instead...
🧵
We already knew that technology matters in education. We knew teachers should grapple with related skills, ethics, professionalism, inclusivity and, yes, theory. The small lesson is that digital education is not optional or specialised. We're all always doing it, like it or not.
We already knew different students find expressing themselves easier or harder in different situations. The small lesson is that this really matters, and we need multiple channels and spaces for communication, and cultures and activities that actually value a diversity of views.