Just this week a friend sent me an article by Albert Mohler, "Why I am a Baptist"
Overall the article is fine (I am myself a Baptist, after all), but this one paragraph is trash, intended to frame an utterly shameful act as something praiseworthy:
The SBC formed as a split out of existing missions organizations (the Baptist Convention for Missionary Purposes, founded 1814, and the American Baptist Home Missionary Society, founded 1832)
They “did not leave their first meeting without establishing mission boards” bc they had just all left the existing boards bc they wouldn’t appoint slave-holders as missionaries.
In order to facilitate that, they had to form their own. That's literally all they were doing
They didn’t establish a theological seminary, because there already were several Baptist seminaries in existence, not least Newton Theological Institution, (founded in 1825), same with a multitude of publishing houses
Mohler: "Getting first things first among the Baptists means preaching the gospel for the conversion of sinners"
Ummm, Baptists had been doing that for centuries. No, "First things first" for the SBC meant slaveholding
The thing is, Mohler actually could have made his point so much better, had he refrained himself from glorifying the SBC -- the Triennial Convention was established in 1814, and Newton (the first Baptist seminary) a decade later in 1825.
The story of the Convention and Newton, and the relation of Baptist theological education and missions is a fascinating and instructive story, and worth reflecting on -- but you would completely miss even a reference to it from Mohler's paragraph
/end rant (maybe)
One more footnote, from @SBTS own "Report on Slavery and Racism in the History of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary" (p. 9) #SBC
"They vindicated their separation from northern Baptists on the premise that slaveholding was morally legitimate."
If you're interested in exploring more of the "scandalously neglected"* field of Northern Baptists, check out @MattCShrader; here's a couple articles to get started:
When I first published "John MacArthur on Robert Lewis Dabney" in 2018, I just looked at his sermons, not his books. I've since updated the post which is nearly twice as long.
The oldest is from 1977, calling Dabney a "Reformed stalwart":
MacArthur cites Dabney, _The Five Points of Calvinism_ in his New Testament Commentary on 1 Timothy
MacArthur's edited book on Preaching recommends Dabney:
"Although R. L. Dabney wrote over a century ago, we join him today in urging that the expository method . . . be restored to that equal place which it held in the primitive and Reformed Churches"
Wow. PCA pastor @ZacharyGarris on Robert Lewis Dabney and racism:
"Though the Bible affirms that all humans are made in God’s image and that Jesus redeems people from every nation, there is nothing in Scripture that teaches that all men are created equal."
Garris had published an article praising Dabney's views of hierarchy "Remembering R. L. Dabney"
"We will find few defenses of hierarchy better than those contained in the writings of Robert Lewis Dabney."
Someone wrote in pointing out "Dabney's Blind Spot"
"The article mentions hierarchal views of biblically sanctioned authority. It does not mention the extension of this to his racist views... This blatant blind spot was worth mentioning in the article."
Answer wrongly, and you will be declined and steered toward another school
Look, I fully support the right of private institutions to do what they want--you do you.
But if you are redrawing the lines from your *written* Affirmation of Faith and Glorious Mission Statement to an *unwritten* culture wars test, I think you should just be honest about that
Also, I can’t get over this part regarding @kkdumez: “texting one [another] about how to handle her.”
When Morton Smith says he thinks "it would have been better" never to have separate Black and white churches after the Civil War, he is referring to the discussion in the Presbyterian Church in the Confederate States of America in 1866 (and following up in 1867)
Should they allow Black churches to separate, "Or shall we endeavor to retain them in ecclesiastical connexion with us, so that we may exert upon them that direct influence for good which we were enabled to exercise in the past [i.e., when we were enslaving them]?"
Banner of Truth worked closely with Presbyterian segregationists in Mississippi in the 1960s (Morton H. Smith and Albert Freundt, Jr.) to republish Dabney's works:
Anyone who has repeated the claim that "Bavinck commended Dabney as one of America's leading theologians" needs to retract that claim.