I saw this above tweet and went 8%?!
How do I get in on this sweet tax rate?
So, I went to the White House site + looked at their “study”
It was not based on tax records or even income (which is what is tax rates are based on).
The study said they included UNSOLD STOCK...
I was confused. What is income from unsold stock? Dividend rates don’t get you there, so what do they mean?
What they are using is not INCOME at all, it is stock appreciation, NOT realized.
This is a made-up proxy of a wealth tax.
This is not how income tax works, and it is straight up a lie to say this is an income tax rate for billionaires and portray it as an average tax rate of the "wealthiest"
Using stock holdings at some point in time and adding estimated gains to income is the equivalent of looking at the gains in the estimated value of your home and saying that is part of your yearly income.
This jeopardizes home ownership, business ownership, etc.
This is some “you will own nothing” grade-A bullshit.
Furthering the dishonesty, they took a one time event and used it to compare to yearly taxes.
This is intentional.
The media has picked it up. They want you to believe billionaires only pay a 8% income tax rate, which is false. They want you to believe it so you give them permission to pass a wealth tax, which they will promise won’t be used on you, but eventually will.
Effing nefarious.
Billionaires will find loopholes. The Biden administration wants to hire more IRS agents and lower reporting requirements to $600 (which they did in the American Rescue Plan for sites like Esty, Venmo, etc), not for billionaires, but to come after YOUR WEALTH.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We are 100% in the position we are now because too many people believed you could suck the rainbow farts out of unicorns’ asses instead of reality.
If you thought you could turn on and off the economy like you were power-cycling a modem without massive issues...
Get a reality check or STFU forever.
If you thought the Fed could just add almost $9 trillion to its balance sheet and the govt could spend trillions it wouldn't have inflationary consequences...
Thread about speech in the digital age—
What’s the path to redemption for unpopular opinions and bad actions?
Who decides?
How are rules ensured to be enforced consistently?
(contd)
Consider this: when someone breaks a law, they are innocent until proven guilty. They have a trial and if found guilty, are given a sentence.
They fulfill that sentence- or get off early for good behavior- and their "debt" has been paid.
When someone says or does something offensive or unpopular, online or offline, while they have not broken the law, there is no due process.
They receive the wrath of the Twitter (or other platform) mob and there is no path to redemption- or perhaps even re-entry.
I am sick of the politicization of everything and infuriated by those who continually do such, their lack of awareness when it is inconvenient "for their side" + utter hypocrisy. The latest is the vaccines-some examples of the flip-flops purely based on politics...
About half-way through, the "informing" of everyone how long other vaccines took and not to fall for it...
Thread/
I’ve written in detail about the biggest, most ignored story-govt enabling the hugest wealth transfer in history from Main Street to Wall Street, enabled by govt deciding who would thrive and who would fight to survive, aided by the Fed, and corporate media won't cover it
For my book, as of today, I am scheduled for exactly zero morning TV programs + zero prime time shows on network or cable. None of the major newspaper outlets are reviewing or excerpting the book. We had one agree...
..., where the writer loved the book and thought it was “fascinating” and informed my publisher’s PR end of day yesterday that the editors pulled it. Not to mention the corporate gig getting canceled as well.
Thread
When you stop to get a shoe shine, do you ask the person how many customers they have had that day and how much they need to live on, or do you ask for the price?
When you buy a loaf of bread from a vendor at a fair, do you ask the person how many customers they have had that day? Do you not care that they may not make a “living wage” that day? Are you not personally obligated by taking their output to ensure they can live? Of course not.
When you trade your money for others’ time or skills, that is based on the value you place on the skills, supply, demand, not an evaluation of their personal needs. This is no different than when someone applies for a job in low-skilled arenas.